« First « Previous Comments 54 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
KgK one says
Not sure if this is real data.
Probably correct. However, there was a modifier of "men" that was added. It's usually left out for stats dealing with Black crime.
The reason why this type of behavior happens all the time is because in 2014 Obama threatened to nuke any school in the country that called the police on black criminal behavior.
They called it the "school to prison pipeline" and his admin threatened to not only force the DOE to withdraw funding from any school that had black kids being apprehended by police but also file title IV and VI suits against them.
I watched the effect of these policies first hand, by the time I was a senior in HS I personally witnessed stabbings, beatings, drug deals, white kids getting jumped in the hallway, and much more all in a "good school".
I think one of the most horrifying things I witnessed was my junior year where a girl had her head repeatedly slammed into a locker by a black kid and was rolled out of the school on a stretcher. The black who did that was back in class 3 days later.
One of my friends' mom was in the admin and she told my mom that they couldn't report the latest fight to the police because if they did and the kid was arrested and sent to juvi then the school would likely lose their funding.
Most schools STILL TO THIS DAY operate like this even with Trump in office and a new DOE because all the local admin is used to it now.
They wont enforce against blacks because it's now been a decade of the threat, even if it isn't credible anymore, that the school will be obliterated if they dare call the police on a black kid.
That’s any culture from outside. Point is pot isn’t melting, it’s just replacing. Bring in million Indians, it’ll become India. Our self serving corporations do exactly that.
Not sure if this is real data.
A father was taking his daughter trick r’ treating when a group of blacks robbed him at gunpoint.

One thing that the neoliberal technological solution enjoyers will never understand about ordinary people’s feelings about crime, is that if Guy A gets his package stolen off his porch, but Guy B doesn’t because he checks the door every 15 minutes to see if the Amazon driver has arrived and diligently removes the package from the porch before anyone has a chance to see that it’s there and take it, and Guy C has to drive across town to an Amazon locker because he’s tired of dealing with it — these are all the same outcome.
Only one of these things shows up as a property crime.
But all three of them are the same outcome.
You have to kill the package thief or put him in prison for a million years or somehow get him to stop being a threat.
You literally cannot address the problem just by preventing the theft. That’s not a win. Nobody cares.
You have to take away the threat.
What you have to understand about our evolved psychology is that we don’t like being around the threat of interpersonal violence. It’s not just that we don’t like the violence itself. It’s not just that we are unhappy when an actual instance of violence spawns into the world.
We don’t like being around the threat of interpersonal violence.
This is why you can’t just give everybody food stamps and then celebrate the negligible statistical effect that it has on crime rates.
Everybody living around those people who would have committed the crimes you prevented can see that the people they were worried about before are still a threat. So they still don’t want to be around them. Which means that the neighborhoods they live in are still going to be undesirable.
People aren’t responding in their daily lives to actual instances of violence, for the most part. Most of us don’t get murdered. We’re responding to the threat of interpersonal violence. We make decisions about where to travel, where to live, where to visit based on the perceived threat.
You can’t just make number go down. You can’t just move things around, coerce this guy over here, pay off that guy over here, introduce this or that technological solution and proclaim victory.
Because none of that addresses the *threat*, which remains.
This is also why urbanists who say silly things like, “I’ve lived in the city for five years and I’ve never been murdered, checkmate quivering conservatives” reveal themselves to be totally clueless.
Crazed BLACK Man Stabs Woman in the Chest in Unprovoked Attack at Chicago Train Station
A crazed BLACK man stabbed a 27-year-old woman in the chest in an unprovoked attack on a train platform on Saturday night in the 400 block of S. Halsted Street.
“On November 8, 2025, at approximately 11:14 p.m. The above pictured BLACK subject produced a large knife from his backpack while on the platform, approached a female seated on a bench on the platform, and stabbed the female causing her to sustain a laceration to the chest,” Chicago PD said in a community alert.
“The unknown BLACK male subject then left the property walking northbound on S. Morgan St,” the police said.
The unidentified BLACK suspect is still at large.
Data never lies. ~3% of the population commits ~50% of the violent crime in the US, and that protected class votes ~90% Democrat. Asians are ~100x more likely to be on the receiving end of violence from the protected class than the other way around. ~90% of attacks on Jews in NYC have been perpetrated from the protected class, which plays the “knockout game” on them. To blame white supremacy is a farce. Asians and Jews are well aware of the patterns, which explains why their neighborhoods have become Republican bastions. The media is shocked that the gaslighting hasn’t worked.
In Chicago, pointing out who is literally murdering people is now racist and citizens who point it out should be avoided.
« First « Previous Comments 54 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
Just two forbidden words.
Would make excellent graffiti, because people would have to think for a moment to realize they just read forbidden words.