patrick.net

Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore but I've always found Anne to be consistent in her views. In this case, she is right. These are serious felonies.

The problem is that I can think of half a dozen other politicians (including the sitting president) that have committed the same felonies - and they were not and are not being prosecuted.

I would say that if I had to judge Trumps' character against Anne Coulters' I would rather be in her orbit than his. She was one of the first national voices on the Trump bandwagon and if he had stayed consistent with what he ran on in 2016 I believe she would still be a fan. I'll remind everyone why he got elected - to close the f'ing border and because he wasn't Hillary Clinton. What we got was no progress on the boarder and was a tax cut that no one asked for.

2016 was a populous uprising at a time when it could have made a real difference in altering the decline of this nation. I still think Trump was the best choice we had (and it wasn't close) but, like Anne, I see him as a massive squandered opportunity and total disappointment.

Still, if I vote again, it will probably be for Trump. Because - who else? RFK Jr.? He'll be gone before the general election.

I don't give a shit what she says about Trump.

If you think Trump is guilty of some crime, I suggest you research the law a little bit first; most people beyond 8th grade have the ability to comprehend written laws.

Read about the Presidential Records Act.

If you want more, read about the decision of District Judge Berman; however now Google will make it difficult if not impossible to read the judge's opinion.

Trump accomplished a lot without help from anyone; recall that Paul Ryan and his ilk prevented Trump from doing things he talked about in his campaign.

stfu says

These are serious felonies.

What are "these"? When Trump was still President (up to the moment before he handed power to Biden), he had the power to declassify any document he had or wanted; after that moment, any document that the Biden administration still allowed Trump access would be either Biden declassifying or someone in his administration violating classification rules. It's not as if Trump downloaded/forwarded his official emails while holding an office other than the POTUS (like Hilary did; Secretary of State had no power to declassify her official classified communications, whereas POTUS had that power) or Trump after leaving the office went back to the archives and stole documents (like Panetta [correction: Berger] did).

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

As Sec. of State, Hillary Clinton broke Federal Law when she used an unsecured, private server for her OFFICIAL email account. When caught, she not only deleted (bleached) 33,000 of those emails, but destroyed laptops, etc. in order to obstruct justice. What was Hillary's penalty for flagrantly breaking Federal Laws? NOTHING.

Joe Biden, as VP, removed a massive amount of documents (1800 boxes) that he did not have the authority to possess. Not only that, he kept these documents in extremely unsecured areas, such as his personal garage. Biden's penalty for doing much worse than Trump? NOTHING.

While Trump has been arrested and charged with multiple felonies for doing much less than Hillary Clinton and Biden, the FBI sits on blockbuster evidence that documents the Biden Crime Family operation, with direct links to Joe Biden himself.

All totalitarian governments have one thing in common; they have centralized police forces that enforce the law according to their political bent. We have ours in the FBI and the CIA.

The elephant in the room is SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT.

All this is a distraction from Hunter and Pedo Joe's bribery proof.

Not to mention Joe's own collection of documents in his garage.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

I heard on some radio today that Trump was offered a deal but declined.

It's a choice between the uniparty or what's left of the US. Everything going on just shows all three branches of government are failing.

the usual fucking media. felonies they say, dare not question that opinion you peasants they say. don’t pay attention that president has authority to declassify anything and doesn’t need approval. but yeah, media… gonna invent the crime. russian collusion didn’t work out, onto next. nazi germany is here in full swing.

stfu says

Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore

You're not alone. That word has suffered the fate of another word - "Nazi": it means anything it needs to mean at the moment.

Eric Holder says

You're not alone. That word has suffered the fate of another word - "Nazi": it means anything it needs to mean at the moment.

Or the fate of another word; 'fascist.' Whenever I hear someone use that term, I try to ask them to define what exactly a fascist is. Their definition usually ends up being some imaginary opposite of whatever political side that they are on.

Anne’s problem is that she still thinks the USA is a nation of laws. I don’t know what distinguishes a “serious” felony vs non-serious in her mind, but she is missing the point.

I don’t argue that Trump didn’t break any laws. He probably did. It’s the double standard and blatant manipulation of the US election that Trump exposes. That is the point.

She wants the wall. That would be great. Trump tried to get it, he wasn’t able to, it’s too bad.

That’s not the point of Trump. Trump exposes the hypocrisy. This indictment will red pill 80% of the US voter base. You can no longer pretend to be the good guy when your party is the one of endless wars while locking up your opponents for “crimes” that they have committed.

pudil says

You can no longer pretend to be the good guy when your party is the one of endless wars while locking up your opponents for “crimes” that they have committed.

Well said. The uniparty wages endless wars. Trump didn’t, so they must destroy him.

pudil says

I don’t argue that Trump didn’t break any laws.

I will.

If he had broken any laws that any prosecutor would pursue he would have been in prison shortly after the escalator announcement. They can't even find any criminal evidence that would condemn him so they continue the big lie of trumped up charges and pronouncements of in-electability.

RayAmerica says

Coulter sticks the knife in Trump by claiming that liberals had it all wrong before by 'crying wolf,' then adds that "liberals finally have him dead to rights committing serious felonies. And no one believes them." (Coulter already believes Trump is guilty)



Go here to read the entire clever hit piece on Trump. Also, be sure to read some of the comments attached to the article.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/14/ann-coulter-the-trump-indictment/

Coulter is a Neocon piece of shit. She's got not ethics at all.

stfu says

Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore but I've always found Anne to be consistent in her views

This is a woman that defended Bush for lying our nation into a war over weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist. She's a scumbag.

You know what "a conservative" is, according to our media? Somebody that is MINDLESSLY loyal to the Republican party regardless of what the Republican party does. If George W. Bush raped a 5 year old male kid on camera, she'd defend it. She would absolutely condemn Joe Biden doing the same thing. She's total scum. She had no principles. She's a partisan whore.

richwicks says

Coulter is a Neocon piece of shit. She's got not ethics at all.

That makes sense. When she was promoting Trump as Prez he was just an actor hired to lose to Hillary.

It's all political theatre, but that does not mean that the criminal syndicate is not trying to kill or enslave us.

Onvacation says

richwicks says

Coulter is a Neocon piece of shit. She's got not ethics at all.

That makes sense. When she was promoting Trump as Prez he was just an actor hired to lose to Hillary.

It's all political theatre, but that does not mean that the criminal syndicate is not trying to kill or enslave us.

i wouldn’t assume that. everyone is people, and people are influenced by things they see and hear. i’ve seen pastors get influenced by lgbt bullshit for example. everything is possible. just have to find way to work through it.

Recall that Coulter turned on Trump because he didn't 'do what he said he would do on illegal immigration.'

Recall too that it was Congress (led by the RINO Speaker Paul Ryan) that steadfastly refused to allocate the necessary funds that Trump requested to build the wall, which Trump insisted upon building.

Somehow, the staunch conservative Coulter misses that part of history, and holds Trump solely accountable.

RayAmerica says

Somehow, the staunch conservative Coulter misses that part of history, and holds Trump solely accountable.

She's an idiot. Alway has been. Coulter is hated by most political affiliations. She's a know it all, horse face cunt with an awful female vocal fry. She's not conservative. She's selling books for $$$. That's her shtick. Acts like an intellectual just like the leftist gays like Maddow.

RayAmerica says

Recall too that it was Congress (led by the RINO Speaker Paul Ryan) that steadfastly refused to allocate the necessary funds that Trump requested to build the wall, which Trump insisted upon building.

Trump can't even get deals done when his own party had the majority (Paul Ryan was too mean!).

But we are to believe an older, slower and more toxic Trump in 2024 is going to be able what he failed to do the first time in taking on Democrats, Media, Deep State and the Republicans?

The above is selective memory; Ryan and others are RINOs and were fucking up Trump at every turn.

socal2 says

Trump can't even get deals done when his own party had the majority (Paul Ryan was too mean!).

But we are to believe an older, slower and more toxic Trump in 2024 is going to be able what he failed to do the first time in taking on Democrats, Media, Deep State and the Republicans?

YEP! Trump's gonna crush those fools with firings and executive orders! The investigations will last decades!

Trump didn't fail to take on the Democans, media, and the criminal syndicate that controls this country. He's just not done.

Or we can vote for DeSantis, who, has "A team ready to dismantle the deep state" that trained and funded him.

clambo says

The above is selective memory; Ryan and others are RINOs and were fucking up Trump at every turn.

Again, saying Trump got rolled by a bunch of RINO squishes is not a great selling message as to why we would want to make him our nominee again in 24.

“Day One” strategy with advisors and strategists, aiming for a “disciplined” and “relentless” operation to rein in the power of the executive branch aligning it with what the “Founding Fathers envisioned.” DeSantis

As if the president controlled the alphabet companies.

I would probably vote for RFK before Ron. We need a disrupter, not another politician who promises to fix the system by using the system.

It's not just the executive branch that is corrupt.

socal2 says

Trump got rolled by a bunch of RINO squishes

Got rolled by? Or exposed?

Onvacation says
I would probably vote for RFK before Ron. We need a disrupter, not another politician who promises to fix the system by using the system.


You'd vote for an extreme Leftist like RFK over DeSantis and are cool with all of RFK's positions below?

- pro abortion
- pro Federal funding of Planned Parenthood
- pro gay-marriage
- pro Impeachment of Trump
- pro gun grabber
- pro student loan forgiveness
- pro CRT taught in H.S.
- pro mail-in ballots for Federal elections
- pro Amnesty for illegals
- pro healthcare for illegals
- pro Federal funding to Sanctuary Cities
- pro expanding the Supreme Court
- pro Single Payer healthcare
- against building a wall on the southern border

https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/robert-kennedy-jr-2/policies