2
0

Titan submersible perspective


               
2023 Jun 23, 10:04am   5,325 views  56 comments

by clambo   follow (2)  

Maybe nobody else is following this subject.
I'm a little annoyed by guys like Cameron saying that he expected the Titan to be destroyed and that the CEO was a kook.
There was likely a design flaw that caused the materials to fail after several dives, which might have been expected.
Another guy who is a gazillionaire from Texas has a submersible which cost him $50 million. It was designed by a company in Florida. He sent it to St. Petersburg Russia for extreme depth testing. It's gone the deepest and it's a sphere of titanium but it's a monster and holds 2.
Gazillionaire guys like him and Cameron hate guys trying to make innovative solutions to an engineering problem without spending $50 million bucks.
I think that Stockton Rush made errors, but it might have been inevitable. Maybe you can't make a safe submersible that isn't a steel sphere.
Remember that the NASA Space Shuttle had a fatal design flaw; the vehicle should be on top of the rocket, not next to it. NASA had a gigantic budget with countless engineers.
Edit: Evidently Stockton Rush is a kook; but I still dislike Cameron, and I'm never watching Avatar.

« First        Comments 52 - 56 of 56        Search these comments

54   RayAmerica   2023 Jun 29, 7:58am  

Oceangate Titan: analysis of an insultingly predictable failure (video)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaOVYkWgpcM
55   RayAmerica   2023 Jun 29, 10:20am  

Carbon fiber, which has never been used in deep sea exploration vehicles, is joined with Titanium, which is held together by a 2" wide bead of glue, and nothing else. What could possibly go wrong?

« First        Comments 52 - 56 of 56        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste