3
0

Flouride is actually poisonous, decreases intelligence.


               
2023 Aug 8, 1:29pm   2,425 views  67 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ntp-report-fluoride-lower-iq-children/


“Our meta-analysis confirms results of previous meta-analyses and extends them by including newer, more precise studies with individual-level exposure measures.

“The data support a consistent inverse association between fluoride exposure and children’s IQ …

“The results were robust to stratifications by risk of bias, gender, age group, outcome assessment, study location, exposure timing, and exposure type (including both drinking water and urinary fluoride).”


People on this site were mentioning the harmful effects of fluoride for years:

https://patrick.net/post/1208286/2012-01-31-population-dumbing-down-through
https://patrick.net/post/1221984/2013-02-18-leading-geneticist-human-intelligence
https://patrick.net/post/1227760/2013-08-02-crest-removes-poison-triclosan-from
https://patrick.net/post/1228112/2013-08-12-israel-court-rules-to-stop-water-fluoridation
https://patrick.net/post/1329135/2019-12-15-what-happens-when-they-take-the

General Jack T. Ripper was right after all.



And what would be even funnier, I guess, is if it turned out to have actually been a communist plot.

Comments 1 - 23 of 67       Last »     Search these comments

1   Ceffer   @   2023 Aug 8, 2:08pm  

The old school John Birchers were right all along? Old Soviet Russia used flouride in water to dumb down and pacify its subject population on purpose, which is probably where the John Birch Society acknowledgment came from. The Russians seem to be the ones cluing us into all of the old Kommie tactics.

Therapeutic uses of flouride in very trace amounts are for childhood tooth decay prevention. That actually works, but is easy to duplicate using children's vitamins and only up to the age of ten or so. After teeth and calcified structures are developed, flouride doesn't have much use, except possibly stabilizing bone in osteoporosis. I am not sure the osteoporosis part is fully agreed, but flouride does enter the calcium matrix of bone, which is a regenerative tissue. Alternatively, however, too much flouride is hell on soft tissues, nerves and brain.

So, why else would you dump a bunch of potentially toxic chemicals in public water supplies? Honorable intentions from government need to be proven these days instead of imposed by assertion fallacy fiat. Since proof from government is a whore to be bought, that might be a long run for a short slide.

I have joined my wife in drinking only double filtered water. In addition to much better tasting water, it does seem to help the general mood. Our bodies are stream beds with the water flowing through. One would guess that the quality of the water might make a difference.
2   Patrick   @   2023 Aug 8, 2:16pm  

I've mentioned it before, but I was horrified at the taste and smell of Bay Area tap water when I first moved out here. I was saying "WTF?" to my wife and everyone else. Smells like nail polish or some other toxic organic solvent.

But a charcoal filter on the tap removes just about all of that taste and smell, which to me seem to show that it is indeed some organic solvent. Carbon filters are good for those. So maybe it's MBTA, which Al Gore wanted put in gasoline. Some people say it's the grease they use to join water pipes together.

My wife didn't believe me, so we did a party trick once where she put out three glasses of water and told me one was unfiltered and the other two were filtered. I could clearly tell unfiltered and filtered, but one glass seemed in-between.

Lo and behold! To trick me she included one glass of half filtered and half unfiltered water, and I got it all correct. A Chinese guy at the event also picked them out correctly, but no one else did. I guess most people just can't taste or smell whatever it is.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/01/04/breast-cancer-studies-under-way-to-determine-why-bay-area-communities-have-high-rates/

It's the water.
3   stereotomy   @   2023 Aug 8, 2:28pm  

I'm running fluoride and lead filters, among other filters, for our tap/cooking water. Fluoride has been shown to induce hypothyroidism in women. Between that and chronic iodine deficiency, women especially are at risk (and largely as a result mentally compromised IMHO).
4   Ceffer   @   2023 Aug 8, 2:39pm  

Women also tend to be the greatest consumers of processed industrial chemicals, what with makeup, hand grease, face grease, powders, perfumes, shampoos, deodorants, hair conditioners etc. etc. I gather the PTB demons have even targeted tampons as injector sites for chemicals. Its probably amazing they can even stand up after plastering themselves with all that shit.

I imagine those scent wicks they put in modern cars aren't designed to help, either. I keep thinking of the Batman movie where Joker put his poisons into makeup. Joker equals Deep State?
5   Ceffer   @   2023 Aug 8, 3:21pm  



https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/115015
6   Ceffer   @   2023 Aug 8, 3:24pm  

That's great. She can just send her 'sex slave' clone over to fuck producers for advancement. Of course, is she talking about 'clones' or programmed multiple personality disorder?

https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/115017
7   Ceffer   @   2023 Aug 8, 3:27pm  

Holy Shit! They were always right! The Devil is in the details.

8   HeadSet   @   2023 Aug 8, 4:48pm  

"THE SPEED OF SOUND IS 666 KNOTS PER SECOND"

That would just be "knots." No such thing as "knots per second." A knot is one nautical mile per hour.
10   Ceffer   @   2023 Dec 28, 11:15pm  

Too much fluoride in too much stuff to achieve zero fluoride. They really are out to get us.

However, since I have been drinking only double filtered water (about four months) and wiping everything washed with tap water with a towel, I do think my memory has improved a bit. You can reduce the titer of fluoride if not the whole shebang.
11   clambo   @   2023 Dec 29, 9:04am  

"Candy is dandy, but sex won't rot your teeth."

In case you hadn't heard.
13   casandra   @   2024 Jan 8, 8:10pm  

duh. We've known this since its inception. We use it to destroy your and your children's penal gland denying your offspring higher level thinking and computing; thus rendering them liberal. Nothing more to learn here folks.
14   ForcedTQ   @   2024 Jan 8, 9:22pm  

The fucking fuck doctors at the Pediatric doctor facility in our neighboring city actually wanted to prescribe and have us administer flouride supplemental pills to our 1 year old!!! I asked why in the hell would we do that, flouride is toxic!? They pushed it again at the next well checkup and we said No way is that substance going into OUR child!

Then about 3 months later we were required to get a few vaccinations done that we did not agree with, at which point we were told that without them our child would not be a patient anymore! I think I actually said fuck off to the doctor when she left after we declined. Ever since then we found a new pediatrician and tell everyone we meet that takes their child there to leave for greener pastures. About 30% of them listen. This is in CA, so mostly fucked…
15   Patrick   @   2024 Jan 20, 9:26am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/sinking-ships-saturday-january-20/comment/47724879


Jessica Funk

PLEASE BRING AWARENESS TO THIS MAJOR LAWSUIT! I am grateful for your diligent work to keep us informed on many topics. It is especially interesting to be kept up to date on the many lawsuits, in courts currently, that have a huge impact on our freedoms.

There is one major suit you are missing and likely because the media, the government and the American Dental Association have worked extremely hard to squash any discussion on the topic. At the end of this month, a court in San Francisco will be covering a 9 day trial on the harms of water fluoridation. This is a controversial topic that spans decades and much like the anti-vaxxers have been attacked as tin foil hat wearing individuals, people on the side of concern about fluoride consumption have been equally maligned and the research suppressed.

As a dentist, I have been indoctrinated to believe that fluoride is the 'savior' of our profession. Any thoughts to the contrary were considered conspiracy. When COVID awoke me to the lies of the medical establishment, I became concerned that parallel lies existed in my profession. Researching the history of water fluoridation is eerily similar to the efforts to promote vaccination. Fluoride is to dentistry what vaccines are to medicine.

One might think that all dentists should be opposed to fluoride...it would certainly generate more business for the industry. But, fluoride treatments and fluoride products are income generating elements of dental practices. Much like vaccines are to pediatric medical offices. And much like vaccines, there is benefit to reducing tooth decay from fluoride but the systemic impact of consumption over a lifetime has consequences for the bones, the kidneys, the thyroid and pineal gland, likely intestinal (leaky gut) and the most harmful, the neurotoxic effects to the brain.

Most of the world does not fluoridate and has seen reductions in tooth decay that parallel what's been seen in this country since the introduction of water fluoridation. The CDC quietly changed its position in the late 90s to admit that topical application of fluoride is the primary method of benefit. I would argue that the sublingual absorption of toothpaste fluoride but that's a topic for another day.

The neurotoxic effects are what is on trial. Unlike vaccines, most people are unable to avoid water fluoridation. Nearly 80% of Americans drink fluoridated water and very few understand that the chemical used to fluoridate our water is the toxic waste of the phosphorus rock and aluminum industries. One can get an exemption from vaccination but the cost to filter fluoride from our water makes this exposure a forced medical treatment.

Please, please...bring awareness to this topic. As I talk to people in my awake medical circles, VERY few are aware of this trial and the impact it can have on our health....and our freedom to choose.
17   Patrick   @   2024 Jan 31, 10:55am  

https://jessicabfunk.substack.com/p/todays-the-day


Today’s the day that water fluoridation, a public health measure spanning more than 70 years, is on trial in San Francisco, California. Judge Edward Chen will be presiding over the presentation of scientific evidence related to the neurotoxicity of fluoride exposure on the developing brain. There is an interesting but not a surprising history behind the lawsuit and the suppression of the science.

November 2016, several non profits (Fluoride Action Network, Food and Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, Moms Against Fluoride and others) petitioned the EPA to ban fluoridation due to the chemical’s neurotoxicity. They used the law, The Toxic Substances Control Act to file this petition against the government. The EPA filed a motion to dismiss the case.

December 2017 Court denies the EPA’s motion to dismiss

February 2018 Court denies the EPA’s request to limit review to the administrative record that would allow important information from new scientific studies published since the case was originally filed.

June 2020 Judge Chen heard arguments from both sides and admitted that the plaintiffs presented ‘serious evidence’ that raises ‘serious questions’ about the safety of continuing water fluoridation. Judge Chen delayed the trial until completion of the NTP report and the benchmark dose analysis completed by the NIH. ...

Complete silence can be heard from the American Dental Association and in my opinion, this is an abhorrent omission on their part in educating dentists and the public. Late last year, the ADA published an article touting the town of Brigham, UT for not taking fluoride out of their water when it came up on the ballot during November voting.




18   Onvacation   @   2024 Jan 31, 5:43pm  

DR. HOWARD HU DISCUSSES HIS TESTIMONY AT THE FLUORIDE LAWSUIT


"There is a negative impact of fluoride exposure in the neurodevelopment of children..."
20   RayAmerica   @   2024 Feb 26, 3:50pm  

We have not used Fluoride toothpaste for years. Several years back, after a check up and cleaning, my Dentist asked me if I wanted the Fluoride 'treatment.' Of course I refused, and he looked at me kind of funny. He then asked me why and I simply answered that I didn't want to put poison into my system. His response was surprising. He said that he won't allow Fluoride toothpaste in his own household. So here you have a Dentist that is offering a high dose Fluoride treatment to his patients, and yet he admits that he won't allow his wife and kids to use Fluoride toothpaste!
21   HeadSet   @   2024 Feb 26, 5:42pm  

RayAmerica says

So here you have a Dentist that is offering a high dose Fluoride treatment to his patients, and yet he admits that he won't allow his wife and kids to use Fluoride toothpaste!

Like a doctor who pushed the covid jab but did not take it himself. $$$$
22   mell   @   2024 Feb 26, 7:42pm  

I find water fluoridation problematic, but not fluoride toothpaste. Or a fluoride varnish as long as you rinse it out right away. There are always pros and cons to everything, tooth decay and bad teeth/gums in general are associated with higher mortality and the enamel protective activity of flouride has been established long ago. If you're not a manic teeth brusher or go to the dentist every month for a fluoride shot you will likely be fine. However drinking water should not be fluoridated! Most kids don't brush enough or hardly at all (did you?), so I have a hard time believing this being an issue (aside from fluoridated water).
23   fdhfoiehfeoi   @   2024 Feb 26, 7:49pm  

RayAmerica says

Of course I refused, and he looked at me kind of funny.


Probably because fluoride is safe as long as you don't ingest it.

Comments 1 - 23 of 67       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste