Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Search these comments
Can you explain the essence of your atheist friend’s “struggle”?
Is it not enough to say that communities where moral rules are enforced tend to survive and grow, whereas immoral ones collapse? That the rules of “moral” communities originally came about by chance and they are still here because they are simply the “fittest”? If not, what does evolutionary psychology add?
The book I read, nearly 30 years ago was The Moral Animal by Robert Wright;
https://www.amazon.com/Moral-Animal-Science-Evolutionary-Psychology/dp/0679763996
The concept is that in any social species, not just humanity, a code of conduct is created for survival of the species as well as the individual - this is the foundation (it's hypothesized) of morality. This was considered a "pop science" back in the 1990's, but it's a serious area of investigation now.
I've kept up on it, but I don't know of a good general resource for it that is more modern. The book of The Moral Animal is to evolutionary psychology as The Origin of the Species is to evolution - very outdated.
Does anybody have a better source than this very early source I know of?
I'm trying to teach somebody but what I have is the most basic book, and a lot of papers and concepts which is too much chaff instead of wheat. Does anybody know a more modern book that explains the concept?
He is struggling to understand morality absent a god. This explains it. He's an atheist, but struggles to understand where morality may come from and I'm looking for a source that can explain the concept. Evolutionary psychology is our latest stab at it. Can somebody give me a more modern book on the concept?