« First « Previous Comments 108 - 113 of 113 Search these comments
Conspiracy researchers go through facts and details before saying something is a lie. Conspiracy theorists just throw shit on the wall. Provide some rationale to justify your statement, or stop throwing shit.
If a person learns to drive in a Toyota Corolla and is able to back into a driveway, do you think that person can just step into a Kenworth and back the 50-foot trailer into a tight loading dock at Walmart? Just wondering.
You're whole take here is a contradiction of itself. You say the media report of the disintegrated plane crash in the field is fake,
Again, and this can't be emphasized enough, a maneuver that experienced commercial pilots said could not be done.
To me amazing is that government can sell to people some unbelievable stories, without any proof. Things which are against logic, math, chemistry, physics, people with professional experience and many people just unconditionally believe in that.
Absolutely false. My buddies flying B-52s used to fly much lower than 500 ft for hours at a time on practice missions. I also personally flew a KC-135 at about 500 ft AGL over Norway for about 100 miles during a route from England to Bodo so we could check out the scenery (ATC cleared us for that since there was virtually no traffic in that area). Another neat trick often done is to fly the plane down the 2 mile long runway while keeping the wheels about 20 ft above the pavement. In this case, being that close to the ground actually increases lift, through something known a "ground effect."
« First « Previous Comments 108 - 113 of 113 Search these comments
https://rumble.com/v3g2f5q-building-7.html