« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 48 Search these comments
@ClownWorld_
Russell Brand has become too influential. He started stating too many truths that were uncomfortable for the elites in the UK and the USA.
The video below is a perfect example. They can't have these things being said by someone with a large audience. They tried to get Joe Rogan removed and it didn't work. Now they are trying for Russell Brand. Are you going to let it work?
The video below is a perfect example. They can't have these things being said by someone with a large audience. They tried to get Joe Rogan removed and it didn't work. Now they are trying for Russell Brand. Are you going to let it work?
So the people who are trying to save us from destruction are responsible for the destruction they claim to be able to save us from?
Sounds like we live in an empire of lies.
I wonder if it's not been going on for my entire lifetime. Iran Contra, the Church Committee, the Gulf of Tonkin false flag, the Kennedy assassination, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Lusitania, the cause of the American civil war even.
Yes, it has been going on longer than any of us has been alive. The lies have gotten better over time, better in that nobody dares question them. Because if you do, Snowden, Asange, Russel Brand, Donald Trump, they will tell you what happens if you dare question the lies.
the propaganda is a lot more sloppy, and stupid.
In a letter shared on Twitter/X, Pavlovski responded:
Today we received an extremely disturbing letter from a committee chair in the UK Parliament.
While Rumble obviously deplores sexual assault, rape, and all serious crimes, and believes that both alleged victims and the accused are entitled to a full and serious investigation, it is vital to note that recent allegations against Russell Brand have nothing to do with content on Rumble’s platform.
Just yesterday, YouTube announced that, based solely on these media accusations, it was barring Mr. Brand from monetizing his video content.
Rumble stands for very different values.
We have devoted ourselves to the vital cause of defending a free internet – meaning an internet where no one arbitrarily dictates which ideas can or cannot be heard, or which citizens may or may not be entitled to a platform.
We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so.
Singling out an individual and demanding his ban is even more disturbing given the absence of any connection between the allegations and his content on Rumble.
We don’t agree with the behavior of many Rumble creators, but we refuse to penalize them for actions that have nothing to do with our platform.
Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company’s values and mission.
We emphatically reject the UK Parliament’s demands.
Tell that to Brand, Asange, Snowden, heck even Epstein and Trump. The propaganda is stronger than ever.
People actually believe CRT, AGW, Trans and queer theory, safe and secure elections, Covid hysteria ( including vastly overinflated deaths and vastly underestimated negative consequences of MRNA injections).... should we go on?
It's very different today. People openly mock the government.
Are you sure about a change? Remember, the Vietnam War had quite a few active and very public protestors.
I do not see anyone out protesting the waste of the Ukraine war. Too many people today still believe BLM, LGBTQ+, Trump Russia Collusion, Biden won 81 million votes and whatever the MSM puts out. Plenty of folks will mask up and take the shots, and even push to require others do so. DEI, trans "rights" and illegal immigration are increasing, not being pared back.
Of all the dictators in history, I have often thought that Maximilien Robespierre the most frightening in his sheer, merciless fanaticism. He believed, with absolute conviction, that when it came to the business of destroying those whom he deemed “the enemies of the nation,” the more cruel and shocking the measure, the better. Over a century before Hitler and Stalin were born, Robespierre expressly praised terror and cruelty in the service of what he deemed virtuous. “Terror is naught but prompt, severe, inflexible justice; it is therefore an emanation of virtue.”
I thought of this astonishing assertion a few days ago when I heard the news that the British actor, comedian, and public affairs commentator, Russell Brand, is facing accusations for crimes he allegedly committed in the years 2006-2013. As the Guardian reported:
"The 48-year-old comedian and actor has been accused of rape, assault and emotional abuse between 2006 and 2013, when he was at the height of his fame working for the BBC and Channel 4 and starring in Hollywood films. He denies the allegations."
Before we have seen any presentation of evidence—never mind a day in court—we are already hearing loud calls from every Establishment quarter in the UK to punish, demonetize, and humiliate him.
Why now, over ten years later? Might it have something to do, for example, with his criticism of COVID-19 vaccines?
People forget that Robespierre was the model for Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc.
Pol Pot didn't invent the year zero - the French Revolution invented it, along with the month of Themidor (heat), Fructidore (Fruiting), etc.
That was the start of it, but the acts of the Jacobins during the Revolutionary years set the tone for totalitarian regimes going forward. Worshipping the Goddess of Reason, hanging bakers for charging what they had to pay for flour, hanging millers and farmers for not selling flour below cost, hanging people including fellow legislators for wrongthink, etc.
We don't really know what happened in the French revolution, anymore than MOST Americans know about the US Civil War. Ask a typical person what the civil war was about, and they will say slavery. No, absolutely not. Do you think poor sharecropper farmers signed up for war over slavery? The Civil war in the US was about taxation that the South was under burden for, and most of the north were mercenaries, given citizenship IF the would fight. That was our influx of Irish (of which I am one) and other Europeans.
Don't judge the French revolution based on what books you can read today. Be cautious. They killed a lot of fucking assholes that deserved to be killed.
, I know tons of lies about it. 6 million Jews weren't killed in it, if that many were killed you'd expect serial numbers to go over a million, they are all under a million. There were no lampshades made from Jewish skin, nor was there any soap made from them. The piles of shoes make me laugh at this point, you mean they went through all this effort to destroy the bodies, but kept the shoes? Really? I've been to holocaust museums, and I always see that pile. It's stupidly childish.
Robespierre was a nasty leftwing tyrant.
They killed a lot of reasonable, liberal people. While they killed Lavoisier (who was running the exchequer during Law's influence) justly, they could have impounded his wealth, put him under house arrest, and let him continue his research into chemistry.
It's a fact that thousands of Civilian Poles were executed by the Nazis simply for being leaders before the war: Professors, Mayors, Retired Officers, Deans, etc. Almost 1700, many confirmed by dental records, in the Palmiry Forest in the first few months alone. And that almost 1000 Polish Catholic Clerics were executed by the Nazis, again with abundant evidence.
Losers who are not executed by the victors do a lot of lying to make themselves look good after they lose, so take their claims with a big grain of salt.
I don't disagree. The "leaders" are what our institutions promote as being leaders.
I'm saying what is believed and told about the holocaust isn't true. There were mass murders, but it is VASTLY over-exaggerated.
Winners lie too. The starvation in the slave labor camps happened because the Allies purposely cut off supply lines, because the slave labor camps were making munitions for the Axis powers. That is why we saw those poor starving people, and they weren't all Jewish.
The US and additional allies, murdered them by starving them to death, to reduce their production of munitions. War is an ugly thing, but our government will never tell you the truth of the horror of it. We murdered them, to win a war.
6 million Jews weren't killed in it, if that many were killed you'd expect serial numbers to go over a million, they are all under a million.
They have a reputation for being a nation of pussies, but they aren't. They stay out of war, and when they go to war, they win.
You can find the answer to this in about 30 seconds.
Which war has France won since the revolution? The French lost in Mexico, Franco-Prussian War, WW1, WW2, and Indochina. Now if you are talking Algeria, well, then yes, they won in the mid 1800s but were thrown out in the 1960s. In 1954, when Algeria was fighting to end French colonial rule, the French destroyed over 8,000 villages and sent over 2 million Algerians to concentration camps.
No wonder they are trying to cancel Russel Brand
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1792280052018647263
No wonder they are trying to cancel Russel Brand
Britsh comedian Russell Brand has accused the corporate media of pushing to normalize the global crisis of young, healthy people dying suddenly from heart failure.
Brand argues that rather than highlight the fact that the surges in cardiac injuries and related only surged after the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out, the corporate media is attempting to gaslight the public into believing it is completely normal.
During an episode of his “Stay Free” podcast this week, Brand said:
“On legacy media, it’s quite possible to watch a kind of bright breezy, cheerful news item about heart attacks as if it’s like some new trend, as if it’s Pogs or Pokemon Go or something.
“It’s a new sensation, heart disease in young people.” ...
Brand continued by mocking efforts by public health authorities and the media to sidestep any connection between increased incidences of heart attacks and the Covid injections.
“We’ve got to get to the bottom of this without ever indicting a major pharmaceutical company,” Brand said.
“In a way, this is hilarious and brilliant, but this is sort of also the way that the legacy media functions, even through innocuous soft power in introducing and normalizing ideas that should be galling and terrifying.”
Brand said some prominent journalists, such as Tucker Carlson, are an exception to this.
However, he noted that these journalists have been “vilified as sort of propagandists and figures of hatred” due to their public criticism of the Covid mRNA shots.
« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 48 Search these comments
Russell Brand is accused of rape, sexual assault and emotional abuse: Star 'attacked four women between 2006 and 2013 - including raping one against wall in his LA home and one he attacked when she was a 16-year-old schoolgirl he called The Child'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12525673/Russell-Brand-rape-allegation-sex-assault-claims.html
original link