by Patrick ➕follow (59) ignore (2)
« First « Previous Comments 107 - 146 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
Once meaning has been unmoored from linguistic signifiers, over time, signified meanings become modular and can be swapped in and out at will by the Party. The short-term results are described above, but it must be stressed that the long-term result of this willful corruption and control of language is far more catastrophic. It is nothing short of the complete intellectual collapse of the Indoctrinated to the point where they are incapable of understanding or discussing even the most basic concepts independently, degenerating to a state of utter reliance on the Party to provide, literally, meaning to their lives.
But there’s no escaping the fact that, before the pandemic Gay and Magill would have gotten away Scott-free with their arrogant refusals to give straight answers to the questions from dull, non-PhD-having Congresspeople. Instead, they pranced prettily into the propeller blades because credentialed experts have no trust residual to draw on anymore. Nobody likes them. Nobody trusts them. They were wrong about everything.
In other words, everyone is fed up with academic experts who think they are better than everybody else just because the media fawned over their every word during the pandemic. They are now experiencing a rude awakening.
I can offer no more recent evidence of the tsunami of reckoning washing away the edifice of fake expertise than yesterday’s Harvard Crimson story headlined, “Top Harvard Medical School Neuroscientist Accused of Research Misconduct.” It’s bad. A Harvard darling, a so-called expert and top medical science research professor, now stands credibly accused of having falsified (Portlanders: that means made up) his data and having plagiarized other people’s images and illustrations, in over 20 of his papers during a twenty-year period. Over once a year on average. ...
The Crimson story suggests the doctor may have taken a few shortcuts, you know, to make sure his papers popped and so that he would get the “right” answer.
Who knows how much the alleged cheating contributed to Shah’s meteoric career? While other academics toiled away, following the rules, not obtaining the astounding pro-pharma results like the not-so-brilliant Dr. Shah did? Real science is a lot harder.
Shah’s deceit was discovered by data manipulation expert Elisabeth M. Bik. Ms. Bik is every woke academician’s worst nightmare. She is a “real” expert with a talent and a passion for sniffing out academic fakesters. Nowadays Elisabeth uses A.I. and reverse image searching to help, but she’s written guides explaining how you too can help expose fraudulent Harvard doctors. According to Liz’s bio, her exposé work has resulted in 1,069 Retractions, 149 Expressions of Concern, and 1,008 Corrections (as of last November).
If you’re a science type, here’s a link to Elisabeth’s blog post on her investigation of Dr. Shah’s ‘work,’ if you can call it that.
For everybody else, according to the Crimson, Bik found 44 different examples of made-up data in Dr. Shah’s papers between 2001 and 2023. But the “most damning” problems were from Shah’s 2022 paper in Nature Communications (it had 32 other authors, but Shah was the lead author). Bik said Shah’s 2022 paper contained figures and images stolen from seven other papers (written by other scientists) plus some images copied straight off the websites of two scientific product vendors.
For instance, one of Shah’s pinched pictures came from an online catalog by R&D Systems, which makes scientific research antibodies. Shah did not give credit to R&D Systems for using its image in his 2022 article. Instead, Dr. Shah claimed the image was from his own work and — get this — he edited the picture’s labels to show a completely different antibody than the original.
Totally fake. Fake, fake, fake fake fake.
“This is a really unusual sort of thing that I cannot imagine how this happens by accident,” drily noted an independent professor who reviewed Bik’s findings for the Crimson.
Harvard again! What is obvious beyond denial is the bigger movement afoot: the anti-expert movement. Ms. Bik’s helpful labors are but one small special forces unit in the army of discontent that Peter Hotez can see coming through his smudgy, pie-shaped eyeglasses. Mark my words. Their downfall will be so complete that before this is over, they’ll be claiming they were set up.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/harvards-plagiarism-problem-multiplies
If Stormy Daniels actually looked like that, she wouldn't have to be trying to extort Trump
Check out the reactions to Harvard Med School's 2024 class music video: "I would remove my own spleen before I allowed one of these people to touch me"
Guys, I think I'm getting just a little worried about the next generation of doctors.
A music video put together by the Harvard Med School class of 2024 is going viral. I think it's a parody of Cardi B's WAP (DO NOT LOOK THAT UP) and it's even more cringe.
Watch this and I promise you you'll start taking better care of yourself.
Imagine that. All those lost slots for highly qualified doctors.
It's terrifying that Medical Students have time to make these videos.
Rumours are Harvard is strapped for cash if its tax-exempt status and $2.3bn in federal funding isn’t reinstated, as the NYT reports ‘Losing International Students Could Devastate Many Colleges’
https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5372334/harvard-professor-offers-a-grim-assessment-of-american-democracy-under-trump
Steven Levitsky came in KQED today says, US fell into kind of authoritarian regime after Trump got reelected. He got some fancy number to measure democracy from 99 before Trump to now 83 which is below to countries like Venezuela!
Don't know, Yale seems to be the real harbinger of Globalist disaster.
we’re getting very close to peak hostage puppy. ...
here we see the classic hostage puppy framing. “if you cancel the 3,000 awful and stupid things we are doing you must also cancel these 3 things that we will point to and say ‘well what about this wonderful thing? are you trying to kill the puppy?’” as if this is the whole of the matter.
it’s grandstanding to select a few points to stand for a whole.
the implication is obvious: you want women to die of breast cancer! this work will all be lost! it’s too important! ...
a $53bn endowment throws off $4.9bn per year, literally $563k per hour in returns (using 9.3% return, harvard’s 7 year historical rate). that’s ~$1,600 per second. surely if this work is as critical as claimed, harvard could spare a handful of seconds from its annual return to pay the electrical bill for these freezers full of precious cargo. the fact that this proposition of “having to shut off the fridge” is even on the table at all is pretty ridiculous.
this is an unserious claim made by unserious people. ...
the good doctor himself likely earns $350-500k a year at harvard (i could not find an exact number but he’s a 250-300 base with endowed chair supplement and likely grant funded salary) but surely this would be sufficient to, at the very least, spring for a few grand in freezer fees to keep the work of his life intact.
this whole line of histrionics is a nonsense. all of this is easy to fix, they just do not want to fix it because they’ve become accustomed to getting the goodies for free. ...
harvard spits out huge piles of profit from its endowment. it earns 9.3% a year but only pays out about 5%. the rest is retained and compounds. the endowment made $4.5bn in 2024 but only paid $2.4bn into the operating budget while slurping up $686 million in taxpayer funded grants.
had harvard instead paid out $3.1bn, they could have still increased their endowment size by $1.4bn while covering ALL the grants and taking nothing from taxpayers and still had $14 million left to pay warren buffet to come to campus and teach the administrators some basic accounting. ...
schools like harvard get panoplies of tax breaks and subsidies. but why are we subsidizing something so incredibly rich and, more absurdly, why are we allowing one of the wealthiest educational institutions in the history of history to so baselessly cry poor?
$53bn is quite a large tax-free hedge fund to run. if its purpose is not to fund research like this that is deemed so irreplaceable and important, then what is it for?
Meanwhile, the culture wars continue apace. Yesterday, President Trump escalated his war with Harvard. The New York Times reported the encouraging story below the headline, “Shock at Harvard After Government Says International Students Must Go.”
Overseas students make up about a third of Harvard’s student body. According to the Times, about 80% of them pay full tuition, a much higher rate than American students. So.
Yesterday, in a curt, 2-page stinker of a letter, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem notified Harvard that its privilege to enroll international students will soon be revoked. Thank you for your attention to this matter. The Times quoted any number of disgruntled foreign students, offended Harvard officials, and loquacious experts, who all wailed about the unfairness of the move since Harvard is no longer an American university but is now a global institution that rightly belongs to the entire world.
The move appears to have come after Harvard sued the Administration on First Amendment grounds, arguing that Trump is unconstitutionally trying to silence their outspoken advocacy for wokeness and DEI, and to force them to agree that universities should be race-neutral. Legally speaking, Trump is on firm ground with this latest revocation of foreign admissions, since he can argue national security — an area firmly within Executive Branch control that courts almost always stay out of.
Almost always. We shall see.
« First « Previous Comments 107 - 146 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,315,108 comments by 15,568 users - Ceffer, ForcedTQ, MolotovCocktail, Patrick online now