▲
7
0
▼

Deep state elimination of democracy is now undeniable: Trump disqualified from the Colorado ballot for the 2024 election


 invite response                
2023 Dec 19, 5:08pm   12,059 views  176 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

https://sashastone.substack.com/p/colorado-supreme-court-bans-trump/comments


It’s funny that the Democrats think that this is the best way to defeat Trump. All it does is make him more popular. On Twitter, the Left is cheering, as though this wasn’t an assault on our Democracy. Oh, history will not be kind.

From the Daily Caller:

Former President Donald Trump has been disqualified from the Colorado ballot for the 2024 election over the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist” ban.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision Trump violated the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” and is ineligible to be on the ballot in the state. The ruling is on hold pending an appeal to the Supreme Court until Jan. 4, CNN reported. The issue must be settled by Jan. 5, which is when the statutory deadline is to set the list of candidates for the Republican primary, according to CNN.

The state’s supreme court ruling found Colorado courts do not need an act of Congress to remove Trump from the ballot and the Jan. 6 riot amounted to an insurrection that Trump allegedly “engaged” in.

Chief Justice Brian Boatright, who dissented, argued Colorado’s election law “was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection,” according to CNN.

“In the absence of an insurrection-related conviction, I would hold that a request to disqualify a candidate under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is not a proper cause of action under Colorado’s election code.”

Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung slammed the ruling as “un-American.”


It is not only un-American, it is literally the elimination of democracy for the benefit of the CIA, NSA, and the corporations which run them and benefit from their treason and subversion.

I hope to be in the front row with a big bag of popcorn when the deep state criminals are hanged for their crimes.




« First        Comments 129 - 168 of 176       Last »     Search these comments

130   Bd6r   2023 Dec 24, 6:28pm  

Had our Christmas beers with neighbor Mexican family. Their kids (a lot of them stereotypically ) came for a visit from Dallas. They did not vote before but now they will be voting Trump…because of border chaos. Good luck Ds with importing more Hispanics. At least in TX they vote sensibly but that may be different in other states
131   tanked   2023 Dec 25, 2:30pm  

There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.
132   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2023 Dec 28, 5:16pm  

tanked says

There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/
134   tanked   2023 Dec 28, 5:43pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says


There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/


All you have to do is look at who is on the SCOTUS. The majority of it are not libtards unlike Colorado's.
135   FarmersWon   2023 Dec 28, 5:51pm  

Pretty sad. democracy and "rule of law" makes this land different, if it dies .. things will go down.
137   Patrick   2023 Dec 29, 11:36am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/deep-dives-friday-december-29-2023


Despite online hysteria, to be abundantly clear, President Trump remains on Colorado’s primary ballot, since the state’s Supreme Court stayed its own order pending appeal. Nothing will change until the appeal is resolved, one way or the other. If the primary happens first, then the whole case will be mooted, and I would not be surprised if that is what happens.

But yesterday the process started all over again in Maine. The New York Times ran a non-paywalled story misleadingly-headlined, “Maine Joins Colorado in Finding Trump Ineligible for Primary Ballot.” That headline is misleading because, unlike Colorado, there was no court decision in Maine; just the unilateral action of its Trump-deranged democrat Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows.

Ms. Bellows, who before she took office used to run Maine’s ACLU, reviewed a citizen complaint and “ruled” that Trump lied on his application form, because he checked a box that says he is “qualified” to run for President but he was not actually qualified, because January 6th:

“I am mindful that no secretary of state has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. I am also mindful, however, that no presidential candidate has ever before engaged in insurrection,” Ms. Bellows, a Democrat, wrote.
This Maine story represents nothing but the very first step in the very same democrat challenge brought in thirty different states over the last few weeks. Later in the Times article, the paper admitted the Secretary of State’s decision was a pre-condition to bringing a legal challenge:

Because of a quirk in Maine’s Constitution, (to challenge Trump’s qualifications in court) registered voters there must first file a petition with the secretary of state. Mr. Trump can appeal Ms. Bellows’s decision to Maine’s Superior Court within five days. Her order will not go into effect until the court rules on an appeal, which the Trump campaign says it intends to file soon.

Republican primaries in Maine and Colorado are both scheduled for March 5th, also known as “Super Tuesday” (when many states hold primaries). Meanwhile, California’s democrat Secretary of State just announced she would not remove Trump from that state’s ballot. She might have been informed by recent federal court dismissals of two lawsuits challenging President Trump’s qualifications on the same grounds.
139   krc   2023 Dec 29, 8:46pm  

What? I don't hear anything - nothing but silence.
Reps won't do a thing... as many want Trump out, so both parties can go back to their crony ways.
There is no reason Red states cannot do the same thing - they just won't.
140   Ceffer   2023 Dec 30, 12:02am  

Patrick says

https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1740781567268778342




They are all Soros Fecal Impactions, started from 2004 when the first one was impacted into Nevada as part of his "Operation Secretary of State", and metastasized from there. You would expect them to be some assortment of Intel and feminist apparatchiks. SOS of the states control the elections, so it is the place you would want to infiltrate to defraud the election apparatus.
144   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jan 2, 9:46pm  

North Caroiina kicks all Biden primary challengers off the ballot, like Florida did.


146   AmericanKulak   2024 Jan 3, 10:32pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

North Caroiina kicks all Biden primary challengers off the ballot, like Florida did.

This is why Third Party MAGA is a bad idea
148   GreaterNYCDude   2024 Jan 4, 8:11am  

Even if the Colorado decision stands (and personally I don't think it will) what would prevent people from simply writing in Trump, even if he's not "on" the ballot per se?
149   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jan 4, 8:16am  

GreaterNYCDude says

Even if the Colorado decision stands (and personally I don't think it will) what would prevent people from simply writing in Trump, even if he's not "on" the ballot per se?


Write in ballots have a far lower participation rate, that's why.

Team Biden is facing the same problem (self inflicted) in New Hampshire.
151   HeadSet   2024 Jan 6, 6:35am  

GreaterNYCDude says

Even if the Colorado decision stands (and personally I don't think it will) what would prevent people from simply writing in Trump, even if he's not "on" the ballot per se?

Because the Colorado decision specifically included disregarding any write-in votes for Trump.
152   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jan 6, 7:41am  

HeadSet says


Because the Colorado decision specifically included disregarding any write-in votes for Trump.


That, too.
154   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jan 10, 2:16pm  

BREAKING

The man who has been filing lawsuits in every state to get Donald Trump removed from the 2024 election ballot has been arrested & charged with filing 17 sets of false tax documents to the IRS

In total, John Anthony Castro has been charged with 33 counts of aiding the preparation of false tax returns. Prosecutors claim he ran a virtual tax preparation business that provided customers with tax returns beyond what they were actually owed, defrauding the government.

Castro announced his "campaign" for President in the Republican primary which was clearly all for show in order for the deep state to use him as a vehicle to file the ballot lawsuits (all of which have failed).

You literally cannot make this up, this guy told judges Donald Trump was a criminal when in actuality, he was a criminal.


https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1745196620789002271

Notice a pattern? First scandalous dirt comes up on that Fulton County 'special prosecutor' and now this?

Team Trump finally got competent. Or someone over there at least has.
158   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jan 29, 3:56pm  

Hawaii Democrat introduces bill to ban Trump from ballot

Hawaii considers legislation to ban presidential candidates over 14th Amendment's insurrection clause

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hawaii-democrat-introduces-bill-ban-trump-ballot
159   Patrick   2024 Feb 8, 7:13pm  

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/scotus-smashes-colorados-case-on


SCOTUS smashes Colorado's "case" on Trump (and, along with it, the "insurrection" narrative)

Kagan, Jackson seemed to share the doubts of the conservative majority as to this latest "liberal" effort to condemn both Trump and those Americans who'd vote for him to "civil death"

Regardless of your take on Trump, or anybody else’s, the Court was somehow overtaken by lucidity—a rare thing in Year 4 of the “COVID crisis.”









161   stereotomy   2024 Feb 9, 7:11am  

Yeah, I think two things are finally being realized by the libtard deep state fucks:

1. After the satanist/pedo/globohomo fuckery of the last few years, there is no way to hold power short of martial law.

2. Any and all tactics, unconstitutional, illegal, or otherwise used against MAGA and left to stand as precident will quickly be turned against them.
162   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Feb 9, 7:35am  

I think they are still slow to recognize 2.
165   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Mar 3, 8:40am  

As The Federalist reported, federal authorities informed Baker and his legal team on Tuesday of a signed warrant for his arrest and instructed him to self-surrender for “alleged J6 crimes” in Dallas, Texas, on Friday morning. Baker has been at the forefront of reporting on the more questionable aspects of the Jan. 6 demonstrations.

While told he was being charged with “non-violent misdemeanors,” federal authorities declined to disclose to Baker or his lawyers what specific crimes underlie the arrest. According to Blaze News, the feds refused to reveal the charges ahead of Friday’s arrest because “they believe[d] Baker [would] post them on social media.” The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees individuals accused of a crime a right to “be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.”


https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/01/biden-regime-ratchets-up-its-authoritarianism-with-arrest-of-blaze-investigative-reporter/
166   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 3:24pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says


There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/


This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.
167   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Mar 4, 3:28pm  

tanked says


UkraineIsFucked says


tanked says


There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/



This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.



You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.


Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.
168   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 4:13pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.


Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.

« First        Comments 129 - 168 of 176       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste