« First « Previous Comments 432 - 471 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments
What's the evidence that Epstein engaged in blackmail for political purposes?
Not being a dick, I'm curious.
I still don't know how she's in prison for facilitating prostitution but there are no Johns to prosecute.
What's the evidence that Epstein engaged in blackmail for political purposes?
Not being a dick, I'm curious.

Maxwell worked for everybody. FBI, MI5/6, etc.
That wonderful alternative news source, Breitbart, somehow has missed the blockbuster story the the FBI and the U S Department of Justice has officially ruled that Jeffrey Epstein did commit suicide, that Epstein was not involved in any political blackmail schemes and that (surprise, surprise) there is no
Epstein File List after all.

I'm sure Pam Blondi who had the Epstein list "sitting on her desk" back in Feb will resign in shame.
Yesterday, launching a social media firestorm, Axios ran the exclusive story headlined, “Exclusive: DOJ, FBI conclude Jeffrey Epstein had no ‘client list,’ committed suicide.” Case closed!
As I began my normal research, things immediately started getting weirder than downtown Portland. As of 4:51 am this morning, the DOJ website appeared to be down. (Update: it was still down as of 8:03 am.)
Axios claimed it had a leaked, unsigned, 1.5-page memo on DOJ letterhead titled “Final Draft E” which allegedly asserted that, after an “extensive review,” the Department concluded, and I am not making this up, “there were no clients." Just Epstein being a pervert. ...
The ‘memo’ is also weird. It kind of looks like an interagency summary, but it’s unsigned. It’s tone is weirdly casual for DOJ. There are no FOIA markings or classification stamps. No formal letterhead beyond DOJ/FBI logos. No Bates numbers or chain of custody disclosures for the video evidence. It reads more like a media talking points memo than a prosecution file summary.
Even weirder, Axios’s link to the DOJ video (hosted at justice.gov/video-files/video1.mp4) still resolves as of this writing, but the landing page’s context is gone. It’s just a bare link to the video without any title or explanation.
And the copy of the document that Axios linked in its article now produces nothing but error codes:
Needless to say, seemingly based only on the Axios “exclusive,” social media accepted it as true and promptly went berserk. Folks are already calling Bondi a sellout and demanding everyone involved be fired. After all, Bondi regularly and often claimed to have Epstein materials in her possession. Now this?? ...
Apart from Axios, corporate media didn’t touch the story with a ten-foot paddle. Not one word about it appeared in the Times, the WaPo, or the WSJ. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s official X account did not mention it. Nor did FBI Director Kash Patel’s. Nor did Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino’s. Nor did President Trump’s Truth Social refer to it anywhere.
The lack of corporate media coverage indicates either coordinated discretion —unlikely— or suspicion of inauthenticity. If the memo were real and cleared, they’d run it, even if only to attack or embarrass the Administration.
On the contrary, in February, Bondi clearly told Fox the Epstein client list was on her desk “right now:”
https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1942037456741863792
So many questions! What should we make of the Axios exclusive and all the social media hot takes? Why is the DOJ’s website down? Was the unsigned letter legit? Why was it clawed back? Is the video really evidence that proves anything, or is it just a random part of the Epstein file? Why didn’t Bondi comment? Your author does not know. Nobody does. Not yet.
At this point, as of 8 am-ish, what my lawyer’s eyes see is some kind of sloppy #Resistance team operation with some access to DOJ’s servers. It appears that DOJ’s top officials have unplugged the web server until they can determine the source of the leak or plant. (But— I’m only guessing.)
As always, I suggest that you avoid the hot takes and wait for the facts. This story is still developing, and is much more than it appears. The memo and video drop are not normal.
« First « Previous Comments 432 - 471 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.