« First « Previous Comments 568 - 607 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments
"What is fantasy? He returned and sucked Pukin's dick. A hard cold fact."
🇮🇱 Maxwell’s business partner was Charles Bronfman, a co-founder of the Mega Group.
🇮🇱 The Mega Group is an exclusive club of Jewish billionaires funding pro-Israel causes.
Trump’s otherwise terrific sixth all-hands Cabinet meeting yesterday was eclipsed by the shadow of a dead pervert. Mid-day, Michelle texted me the short clip, saying only, “I don’t like this.” She meant she didn’t like how President Trump handled the Epstein question. I’ll give you my lawyer’s take.
First of all, it is already a dramatic improvement that a reporter was freely allowed to ask the unscripted question at all; under Biden, there wouldn’t have been any questions. I give Trump partial credit for jumping in and commenting.
Though the reporter’s delivery was awkwardly circuitous, he clearly asked Pam Bondi two critical questions: (1) Was Jeffrey Epstein an asset of any U.S. intelligence agency? (2) Why is a minute missing from the prison video outside Epstein’s cell? Neither question suggested any wrongdoing, cast blame, or even expressed skepticism.
Trump, with a quick apology to Bondi, immediately interrupted. Here’s his full answer, delivered with the kind of incredulous exasperation of a mom answering a curious child’s 100th repetitive question about how the Sun works right before saying, “from now on, ask your father”:
“Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy has been talked about for years. You are asking … we have taxes, this, and all of the things, and are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable. (To Bondi:) Do you want to waste the time? You feel like answering? (To reporter:) I cannot believe you are asking a question on Epstein on a time like this when we are having some of the greatest success, and also tragedy, with what happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration. (To Bondi:) You go ahead.”
Trump’s unexpectedly aggressive response rubbed Michelle the wrong way. And if you watch the clip, you’ll see what she meant when she said she didn’t like it. Trump comes off as uncharacteristically defensive; his delivery wildly overshot the mark. By labeling the two most often-asked questions on conservative social media “a desecration” unfairly implied that the questions themselves were transgressive— but desecration of what? Epstein’s sacred memory? It was a misstep.
Trump’s answer sounded too much like Hillary’s infamous response to the Benghazi disaster. "At this point, what does it matter? Let’s move on." ...
Trump’s comments notwithstanding, the Epstein story is not meekly going to go away. Yesterday, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino broke his post-memo silence and posted this overly optimistic tweet:
Oh, boy. Here are the top responses from the MAGA fire brigades:
Epstein is the tip of the PedoBerg.
https://t.me/tribunalsandexecutions/519457
Trump: “I can’t believe you’re asking a question about Epstein at a time like this…”
How dare we?! ...
Whether you voted for DT or not, we have all been betrayed. Especially the abused children, both dead and alive, who, for a hot minute there, might have actually expected justice.
the abused children
(The First Rule of Modern Journalism: Whatever you do, do not follow the money.)
So let’s follow some of it …
As best I can determine, Jeffrey Epstein was probably not a billionaire, but he was close.
One can simply tally how much Epstein spent to buy two islands in the Virgin Islands, the largest “ranch” in New Mexico, a mansion in Palm Beach, a luxury apartment in Paris and the largest or most-expensive town home in Manhattan* - plus a couple of large jets, at least one helicopter and the pilots and ground crews to keep these “trafficking” vehicles operating.
*Note: Apparently, Les Wexner simply gave Epstein his house in Manhattan, valued at $77 million. If one chooses to “follow the money,” one could research how many people simply hand over such pricey real estate to a business acquaintance … and why someone might provide such a gift. ...
(One reason Epstein got re-arrested in 2019 is that someone at the Virgin Islands’ airport reported seeing large numbers of teenage girls mingling on the run-way after stepping off his jet. Presumably, this observant whistleblower deduced Epstein wasn’t running a charity tourist operation allowing underprivileged girls to spend a week in the beautiful Virgin Islands). ...
The best evidence that Epstein and Maxwell were indeed “trafficking” teenagers for sex were details of three alleged sexual rendezvous involving the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Prince Andrew, the brother of the current King of England.
If true, this allegation would seem to meet all the legal definitions of “sex trafficking” as the late Mrs. Giuffre, 17 at the time, said on multiple occasions and under oath, that she had sex with the Prince on at least three occasions.
She was, apparently, “trafficked” as she reported that she arrived at these events via a large private jet owned by Epstein. Indeed, the sole purpose of her flying to London with Epstein and Maxwell was to have sex with the planet’s second most famous prince.
The mug shot the world never saw …
If authorities were seeking to put an end to an alleged international, two-decades long sex-trafficking operation, they could first question Prince Andrew, then book him, take his mug shot, get this photo published in every paper in the world and then - to prove that justice is blind - impose the standard sentence given to, say, a truck driver caught in a trafficking sting in Liverpool or Peoria.
This would send a signal to past and future customers of sex-trafficking operations that such behavior might be harmful to one’s reputations and career prospects.
“You better not do this or this could happen to you too” is supposedly one of the key crime-deterring goals of law enforcement and prosecutors.
Interestingly, though, Prince Andrew - who became the Poster Child (Royal) of the demand-side of Epstein’s operations - was never questioned by authorities, much less scowled for a mug shot photo (like, for example, President Trump had to endure).
In fact, in the two decades that Epstein was involved in this definitely illegal business, not one possible “John” or client has ever been questioned by one law enforcement official or prosecutor. ...
Since no new “files” are going to be released and “transparency” now means “you’ll get nothing and like it,” the public can only speculate as to what really took place behind the curtains.
My speculation, which I’d bet a seafood dinner at Captain Anderson’s is largely accurate, tells me that …
Epstein and Maxwell were NOT the bosses of this operation. The real masterminds, funders, beneficiaries and bosses were diabolical intelligence operatives with Mossad, the government of Israel’s version of the CIA.
That is, there’s no way on God’s Green Earth that a former math teacher would have the money and protection to pull off such a multi-faceted operation for decades. ...
“Blackmail” means a criminal has demanded money in exchange for not divulging embarrassing information.
Personally, I don’t think Epstein would have to resort to such prosaic and crude methods.
That is, the knowledge he could do this would be sufficient to influence the activities of another person.
Epstein wasn’t getting hundreds of millions of dollars from under-the-table blackmail payments, he was getting it from the treasury of the government of Israel. (And/or super wealthy supporters of Israel like Les Wexner, who were used to funnel necessary funds to Epstein).
The reason no files can be revealed, or real court cases tried, is that such information would show that this honey-pot/extortion scheme was always an Israeli/Mossad operation. (From The Godfather: “It was Barzini all along.”)
Furthermore, everyone who matters in the U.S. government knew this all along.
People aren’t being protected, entire governments are …
If this is true, this would mean that the government of Israel and the government of the United States both seem to condone extortion sex trafficking operations involving minors. (Presumably for “national security” and not, in this case, to “protect the children.”)
Yes, it became important to not humiliate and disgrace the actual “Johns” (who, once compromised, were more likely to service the goals of the Deep State), but the real “thermo nuclear” revelation would be that at least two influential governments are evil, sick, captured and running, or allowing to operate, major and nefarious criminal operations.
If just about everyone learned this “truth,” all remaining trust in government might, hypothetically (but possibly) vanish, a scenario that potentially could lead to revolution, secession and the world’s rulers making an emergency exodus to their New Zealand fall-out bunkers.
The reason the files (or the full Epstein truth) will never be released is these disclosures might reveal that everyone who matters was somehow complicit in covering up stunning truths.
Just like with the litany of Covid crimes, one suspects the numbers of conspirators are simply too numerous to prosecute or purge. (One also suspects that the Epstein operation and cover-up, fully revealed, would make Watergate seem like a scandal to fix parking tickets.) ...
The primary lesson from the Epstein saga is that at least one government can spend decades and hundreds of millions of dollars coordinating a honey-pot/extortion sex trafficking operation involving minors and … this nation got away with it … with a major assist from the government of the USA - spanning at least four presidential administrations.
If these forces are powerful, brazen and ruthless enough to conceive, execute and get away with such a sinister operation, one wonders what operations they’ve concocted that haven’t been even partially exposed.
Answer: We’ll never find out, but it’s probably best to self censor and not try to find out.
It’s not just Prince Andrew, (the three Williams not counting Bill Cosby) - Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Bill Richardson - plus former Sen George Mitchell, President Trump, etc. being “protected” from exposure, it’s the entire government of Israel.
And since the entire government of America is apparently working with or covering for Israel, it’s our own government that risks exposure as well. ...
However, I will say it seems pretty obvious that leading figures from both political parties are implicated, which means this is a Uni-Party Scandal. As we learned from Covid, Uni-Party Scandals are the gold-standard of scandal insurance - a lesson Epstein and his Mossad bosses surely figured out long ago.
« First « Previous Comments 568 - 607 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.