« First « Previous Comments 775 - 814 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments

Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?
Maxwell, 63, is the only person behind bars - serving 20 years on child sex trafficking charges - despite the fact that pedophile Jeffrey Epstein allegedly controlled a web of underage girls.
Additionally, Epstein's victims alleged they were passed around as sex toys to his wealthy friends and billionaire business associates who regularly visited his homes including his private island, Little Saint James.
Now a source said: 'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story.
'No-one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows. She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth.'
What that 'truth' is remains to be seen. Maxwell was convicted in 2022 over her role in a scheme to sexual exploit and abuse multiple minor girls with Epstein over the course of a decade.
Ghislaine's life expectancy just got a lot shorter.
epstein was obviously some sort of asset running some sort of ugly honeypot ring. he and ghislaine had all manner of ties to the intelligence community, this is exactly the sort of game the IC likes to play, and the stunning speed with which a whole bunch of charges got dropped back in 2008 after the FBI’s “operation leap year” led to a 53 page federal indictment for enticing and recruiting dozens of underaged girls into prostitution, sexual abuse, and sex trafficking cannot help but elicit suspicion. his infamous non-prosecution agreement led to this never being filed and full immunity from federal charges with slap on the wrist punishment in florida.
from there one would at least expect some level of future moderation, but nope. he became more politically connected than ever and the lolita express to epstein island was back in business and business was booming.
sorry, but this sort of stuff does not happen without all manner of very serious air cover. ...
it does make quite a lot of sense. ghislaine’s father, robert maxwell was widely believed to be mossad and everything around jeffrey seems to have weird distortion fields of tactical incompetence and extreme coincidence that never quite allow the truth to out.
a man who knew too much about some excruciatingly powerful and ruthless people who was under tight surveillance manages unseen suicide at just the moment everything to monitor and prevent it failed.
huh.
people are, of course, free to have their own views here, but to my mind, to call this a heckofa series of co-ink-i-dinks would seem to exceed the bounds of even the most charitable assessment.
some facts:
July 23, 2019 – First Suicide Attempt:
Epstein was found semi-conscious in his cell with neck injuries, initially reported as a possible suicide attempt. He was placed on suicide watch following this incident.
Surveillance footage from outside his cell during this event was requested by the attorney of Epstein’s cellmate, Nicholas Tartaglione, to determine if Tartaglione was involved. However, federal prosecutors later revealed that the MCC inadvertently preserved footage from the wrong cell block due to a clerical error. As a result, the footage from outside Epstein’s cell on July 22-23, 2019, was permanently deleted. A backup system also failed to retain the footage due to technical errors
August 10, 2019 – Epstein’s Death:
Epstein was found dead in his cell, ruled a suicide by hanging by the New York City medical examiner. Two cameras outside his cell in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) were reported to have malfunctioned, raising suspicions.
According to reports, one camera’s footage was deemed "unusable," though it was not specified whether this was due to technical failure, poor quality, or other issues. Other cameras in the area captured clearer footage, but none showed the interior of Epstein’s cell, as MCC cameras were positioned to monitor only external areas like hallways.
A Department of Justice (DOJ) report clarified that a hard drive issue, identified days before Epstein’s death, meant only one camera in the SHU was recording to DVR. This camera did not capture the entrance to Epstein’s tier or cell, limiting its usefulness. The cameras were functional for live monitoring by guards but did not record due to the hard drive problem.
The DOJ later released surveillance footage from the night of Epstein’s death, showing no one entering or exiting his cell from 10:40 p.m. on August 9 until 6:30 a.m. on August 10, supporting the conclusion of suicide with no evidence of foul play. However, a missing minute in the footage’s timestamp (skipping from 11:58:58 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.) raised further questions, though no definitive explanation for this discrepancy has been provided.
Additional Context
Guard Misconduct: Two guards, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, assigned to monitor Epstein, were charged with falsifying records and failing to conduct required checks every 30 minutes. They admitted to sleeping and shopping online during their shift, contributing to the lack of direct supervision.
Suicide Watch Removal: Epstein was taken off suicide watch on July 29, despite his earlier attempt, and was not assigned a new cellmate after Tartaglione was transferred, violating protocol. This left him alone in his cell, with excess bed linens that he used to hang himself.
this latest video one is just more “you have to be kidding me” level outcome. ...
but what i find especially interesting now is this new push to “there were no files, no tapes, no black book or list, it was all just a misunderstanding or cunning lie.”
with all due respect, pull my other paw, it plays jingle bells.
personally, i simply do not believe that there is no list, no video, no record.
from the looks of things, epstein had more video equipment than spielberg and piles of very suspicious stuff that was, suspiciously, not seizable when found and that then disappeared.
https://x.com/chrismartenson/status/1944064520533545296
The FBI raided Epstein's Manhattan townhouse in July 2019, cracked open a safe, and found jewels, fake passports, photographs, and DVDs, but couldn't take it with them because they forgot to bring a warrant for the search. When they later returned -- surprise! -- it was all missing.
... it’s not about jeffrey, ghislaine and their probably creepy proclivities.
it’s about this:
do we really have a society of kompromat-extorted sex predators dug into the upper reaches of our government and business communities?
it’s kind of a big question. ...
political cabal by mutually assured destruction and enforced compliance to whoever is calling the shots owing to same and the knowledge that if you turn squealer, no place is safe and “was suicided” is always an option. ...
justifications are running amok.
scott adams (who has me blocked so i cannot respond to him directly) is now creating fantastical hobgoblin hostage puppies to excuse the refusal to release the epstien list.
"unless you are willing to experience every one of these wild surmises about some bad thing that might happen, you need to trust the government to decide what's best for you!" is not a serious position, it's a false framing by assumptive false premise.
possible does not mean certain or even likely. "would you favor going to buy a car if you knew you might one day kill a pedestrian who would have grown up to cure cancer?"
i mean, you can take this logic anyplace. ...
are we seriously to imagine that such a status quo is somehow the lesser of long-term evils or that leaders compromised by such kompromat are somehow more likely to be on our side or to lead to a better world?
this idea that we elect the president to “decide what the public can safely see” seems an intense inversion when speaking of an idea like “your government might be a compromised pedo cult.”
on what planet does safety lie with hiding that fact? ...
anyone espousing “trust the government to make good choices about when to lie to you about the government being liars” is not a serious person. ...
leaving out the “benefit” side of a cost/benefit equation seems like the very definition of an incomplete analysis.
what if full disclosure finally led to a more decent, uncaptured government more in line with american values and could restore some semblance of fiscal responsibility?
what if it gutted the two political parties and allowed us to finally break their strangle-hold on our politics?
scott’s take seems a one-sided political tapdance that boils down to "trust the government to decide what we the people should know about our leaders."
As if this story couldn’t get any worse. Last Friday, Wired Magazine ran an explosive story under a very carefully worded headline, “Metadata Shows the FBI’s ‘Raw’ Jeffrey Epstein Prison Video Was Likely Modified.” It was a rookie mistake. The sub-headline cautiously clarified, “There is no evidence the footage was deceptively manipulated, but ambiguities around how the video was processed may further fuel conspiracy theories about Epstein’s death.”
The story was about the critical hallway camera footage from the morning Epstein allegedly hanged himself in federal custody, following a suspicious series of “coincidences” involving broken cameras and sleeping guards. Wired’s cavils and reservations were appropriate, even if darkly hilarious. Saying there’s “no evidence” that a manipulated video was deceptively manipulated on purpose is technically true, but the altered video itself is the evidence of deception. ...
“If a lawyer brought me this file and asked if it was suitable for court, I’d say no. Go back to the source. Do it right,” Wired’s digital forensic expert said. “Do a direct export from the original system—no monkey business.” The DOJ’s “raw” video’s metadata included references to at least two different Adobe project files and two specific source clips with different dates.
If this happened during a trial, the judge might even allow ultra-rare mid-trial discovery, so the recipient’s lawyers could take depositions, scrutinize hard drives, and so forth. You can bet that motion would be filed, at least.
Patrick says
Ghislaine's life expectancy just got a lot shorter.
Doubt she will testify to shit and how would we know it was her and not another imposter. Months ago, the Woo chicken bones stated that even Jeffrey himself might return from the grave to testify.
So many psyops, so little time.






But first, we take a look at the MAGA base’s attachment to Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theories.
After years spent spreading spidery conspiracy theories for his own political gain, President Trump has found himself wrapped up in the stickiest one of them of all. For more than a week, the political movement he created has convulsed with righteous fury over Jeffrey Epstein and the things the administration has said and done — or rather not done — about his death.
Trump’s supporters simply cannot swallow the anticlimactic conclusion that the Justice Department reached eight days ago when it said: There’s nothing to see here, folks. No secret client list, no ties to foreign governments, no clique of Washington protectors who shielded the financier and his friends from justice for preying on girls. Over the weekend, a rabble of conspiracists who’ve been hand-fed for years by Trump broke into open revolt.
The fallout is testing the power that the president holds over his most loyal followers, the ones who’ve trusted him all along and who believed they would learn a whole lot more about the Epstein saga if they returned Trump to office.
Maybe the revolt will sputter out, but it has been stunning to behold. It is a Möbius strip of paranoia and distrust: A political movement that began with a conspiracy theory — lies about Barack Obama’s birthplace were central to Trump’s rise — is cannibalizing itself over another conspiracy theory.
But the nature of the problem is being misrepresented. Attorney General Bondi did not decide on her own that the Epstein file was empty. She was not protecting Trump. The decision was imposed on the Trump administration by the American Establishment, the Ruling Elite, the Deep State, the Globalists–whatever you want to call those whose money and economic interests rule the governments in the Western World.
The issue our rulers put to President Trump was: Are you prepared to discredit in the eyes of the American People the ruling establishment and the government of the United States? If the people lose confidence in their government, how can you accomplish anything?
Netanyahu was there with Trump to back them up. If you release the Epstein Files it will be revealed that he was a Mossad agent blackmailing your leaders. We, Israel, will release the names, and your country will be ruined. ...
But it is not only Bondi having difficulties. It is also Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human services, and Trump himself.
Robert Kennedy has found that despite being a cabinet secretary in the US government, he cannot decide based on hard evidence that the Covid “vaccine” is harmful to everyone. All RFK could do was to cease the government’s recommendation of the deadly Covid vax for healthy children and pregnant women. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is powerless to stop the vaccination of the vast majority of the American population with a “vaccine” that kills and destroys the immune system. Big Pharma is more powerful than the US Secretary for Health. ...
Americans have a false belief in the power of a president. As long as private money determines politics, money, not the people, rules.
Plot twist! Yesterday, Axios —which broke the Epstein-DOJ story— ran a followup article headlined, “House Republicans block Democratic maneuver to force release of Epstein files.” Of course they did.
https://www.axios.com/2025/07/15/trump-epstein-khanna-doj-democrats-republicans
Yesterday, House Democrats filed a proposed amendment to a cryptocurrency bill that would have forced the DOJ to release the Epstein files. How about that? "The question with Epstein is: Whose side are you on?" Representative Ro Khanna (D-Ca.), the author of the Epstein measure, asked Axios ahead of the vote.
House Republicans, predictably, shot down the proposal. That, Axios said, “was the outcome Democrats anticipated, and one they plan to gleefully cite as President Trump continues to grapple with the MAGA fallout over the DOJ's handling of the documents.”
They demand transparency. “I want to know what the hell is in these files,” demanded Representative Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee. Khanna asked rhetorically, “Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, or are you on the side of the people?" Then he promised to re-introduce his amendment “again and again and again.”
Finally! It’s the wedge issue they’ve been waiting for. ...
I wonder whether Democrat elites can get their own base on board for this. Maybe. But it’ll take some spectacular mental gymnastics. These are the same folks who just two years ago called Epstein speculation a QAnon dogwhistle and dismissed the entire subject as right-wing paranoia. Now they’re polishing their halos and demanding Pam Bondi release the files in the name of democracy.
It’s either his greatest unforced error since Trump rode down the escalator, or he’s working the world’s biggest rope-a-dope and creating a controversy to secure the media’s laser focus. I sure hope it’s the latter.
Either way, I’ll bet your 2025 bingo card didn’t have Democrats demanding the Epstein Files on it.





@Tom MacDonald
If there's one thing the Epstein list cover-up has
taught us...it's that Democrats and Republicans
can definitely work together when they want to.

This is wild.
Eric Weinstein says he'd "bet money" Epstein was an intelligence asset-
and that his reach even extended to controlling scientists and burying
discoveries.
According to Weinstein, Epstein and his girlfriend's father were part of a
"control mechanism" designed to keep revolutionary discoveries "within
a framework."
In plain English, that likely means discoveries didn't see the light of day
unless whoever was controlling Epstein approved it.
"I was in the Harvard Mathematics Department. Jeffrey Epstein was
absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department. I want to know
why. How was he connected to the Math Department?"
"Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount about my work when
nobody knew anything about my work."
"It was very important to get Nobel laureates and some of the smartest
people on Earth to come to the Virgin Islands and talk about gravity.
Stephen Hawking was there, David Gross was there. Lawrence Krauss
was there. Lisa Randall was there right before his conviction."
"I think that his girlfriend's father, Robert Maxwell, was all through
scientific publishing. And I think Pergamon n Press was in part a control
mechanism for making sure that revolutionary discoveries were taking
place within a framework."
"I think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying to fund science, trying to
control it. I don't really know."
This 7-minute clip says a lot.
@RealAlexJones
Nothing can stop the truth coming out!
This Epstein clip will send chills down your spine. Have you ever seen it?
This is Cindy McCain admitting that “everyone” in elite politics knew that Epstein was raping underage kids but no one acted because they were “afraid” of the pedophile.
What an astonishing admission from one of the most powerful women in American politics whose husband was the Republican candidate for President.
The DOJ, FBI, federal law enforcement, and powerful politicians all knew Epstein’s crimes and chose to look the other way.
They didn’t just ignore it. They were enablers by their silence.
Now the DOJ wants you to believe there’s no Epstein client list, no evidence, and that the case is closed!?
This is not Justice. Something dark is happening here…
« First « Previous Comments 775 - 814 of 1,663 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.