patrick.net

Anti-1A

And calculated to create a rift between New and Old Right and Libertarians to offset the Democrat's Rift.

Who killed Jesus? Will it be illegal to own the Bible that declares the following? Will Pastors be arrested and charged if they use these verses in a sermon? What are the ramifications of this 'law' that they are in the process of passing?

"For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost." - I Thessalonians 3:14-16

“Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.” - John 5:18

Pontius Pilate attempts to release Jesus, but the Jews refuse, and instead choose a criminal to be released:

"Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.

Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.

But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber."
- John 18: 37-40

As usual everyone missed the cheap shot, deflect and project impetus of the measure. Here we have stark raving lunatic Democrats POC's, LBGTQ(what eva), and Jewish along side white agitators and NGO Terrorist groups conducting Antiemetic calls for lynching on Universities around the Country. So here comes the RINO wing of the Establishment to pin all of the vitriol and upheaval on the Conservative Christians and otherwise MAGAverse.
Everyone is going ballistic over the language used and the legal ramifications, and totally letting the distraction narrative go right over their heads.

Like I always say, it's subtle sophisticated politics, that most people don't understand.

house of corruption

Tenpoundbass says

As usual everyone missed the cheap shot, deflect and project impetus of the measure. Here we have stark raving lunatic Democrats POC's, LBGTQ(what eva), and Jewish along side white agitators and NGO Terrorist groups conducting Antiemetic calls for lynching on Universities around the Country. So here comes the RINO wing of the Establishment to pin all of the vitriol and upheaval on the Conservative Christians and otherwise MAGAverse.
Everyone is going ballistic over the language used and the legal ramifications, and totally letting the distraction narrative go right over their heads.

Like I always say, it's subtle sophisticated politics, that most people don't understand.

Yep, it's part enshrine what is already there to help Jeffries and Biden make a meaningless sop to non-radical Democrats without offending the Turd Worlders and Wokies, part to create a Rift in the Right to counterbalance the Rift in the Left.

Oh, and to choke off Jexit just as it begins. FINALLY, kneejerk Dem Jews are coming around. So what better time to get "The Jews DID Kill Jesus!" fights going. Amazing that people can't see this. The 1A Trumps all and the RINOs and working with Dems to stop Trump.

Almost everybody complaining about it didn't Read the Bill. The IHRA definition was adopted in a TRUMP 2018 EO for determining Civil Rights violations by US Government Entities. All this does is have the legislature confirm the EO.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text

All the bill means is if some State University Dean tries to expel a Jewish student for supporting ISRAHELL without mentioning his Judaism, they are violating his Civil Rights. Just as if a Dean was to try to expel a Catholic Student for his "Allegience to Vatican City" without mentioning Catholicism.

Literally nothing in the Bill makes it "Illegal" to believe whatever misreading or ignorance of the Bible OR Official Catholic Doctrine (going back to 1566 and the Council of Trent) somebody wants to espouse.

Read it.

Jesus was Jewish.

ZDS (Zionist derangement syndrome) sufferers would have you believe, that Jewish Jesus was killed by the Zionists.

It’s one giant circle jerk where Zionists are the cause of all of our problems. Gee where have we heard that one before?

Come back to reality before it is too late!

No one is claiming that 'Zionists killed Jesus.' But it is factual to state that Zionism was created as a secular/political movement in the 19th. Century that had as its primary goal to create a Zionist State in Palestine. And, it is also factual that the Bible clearly states that the Jewish hierarchy in Jesus's time on earth were directly responsible for killing Him.

After Stephen was falsely accused by the Jews (they had a habit of doing that), Stephen gave a dissertation in detail of Jewish history, ending with the following statement. The response of the Jews to the truth that was boldly declared by Stephen was to stone him to death:

"Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.

Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers:

Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it.

When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth." - Acts 7: 51-54

RayAmerica says

But it is factual to state that Zionism was created as a secular/political movement in the 19th.

"Next year in Jerusalem" goes back to the first millenium AD, and it's as a recurring theme in the OT as the theme of Pity and Mercy in LOTR

That it became stronger in the 19th is no surprise, MANY Nationalist movements grew and succeeded in the 19th Century. Greece for one. United Germany for another.

RayAmerica says

And, it is also factual that the Bible clearly states that the Jewish hierarchy in Jesus's time on earth were directly responsible for killing Him.

I addressed this in another thread. If only the Jews killed Jesus, then Jesus' sacrifice was only for Jewish redemption: The Bible makes it clear all Mankind is guilty, and so all Mankind can gain Salvation.

FTR not one Christian has protested at any Universality deriding Jews, and calling for the end of Israel. Never!
But these Shitheads saw fit to shoe horn an antiemetic bill that attacks Christians and the Bible while not saying a word about any Shit finger in the US infiltrating our higher learning institutions, while denying the Students their lawful entry and violating their constitutional rights. Without defending Jews or Israel, we already have constitutional laws that calls what they are doing an insurrection riot and NOT a protest.

It's not illegal to hate Jews.

Did you read the bill? It basically makes Trump's 2018 EO about Civil Rights violations by Government institutions or Employers apply to somebody's stance on Israel.

No different than "I'm not firing you for being a Mary Worshipper, I'm firing you for your support of Vatican City, tee hee! That technicality will allow me to do this and prevent a lawsuit!"

RayAmerica says

But it is factual to state that Zionism was created as a secular/political movement in the 19th. Century...

No. You need to get your facts straight. Start in Genesis. We’ll wait...

You are confusing the Biblical term "Zion" with what the modernist secular/political movement took as their official name of Zionism. (Similar to the Federal Reserve using the name 'federal' when in fact it is not a part of the Federal Government, it is a private banking conglomerate that controls the money supply).

Zionism (/ˈzaɪ.ənɪzəm/ ZY-ə-niz-əm; Hebrew: צִיּוֹנוּת, romanized: Ṣīyyonūt, IPA: [tsijoˈnut]; derived from Zion) is a nationalist[1][fn 1] movement that emerged in Europe in the late 19th century aiming for the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people, particularly in Palestine,[4][5][6] a region roughly corresponding to the Land of Israel in Jewish tradition.[7][8][9][10] Following the establishment of the State of Israel, Zionism became an ideology that supports the development and protection of the Israel as a Jewish state.[1][11][12] It has also been described as Israel's national or state ideology.[13]

Zionism initially emerged in Central and Eastern Europe as a national revival movement in the late 19th century, in reaction to newer waves of antisemitism and as a consequence of the Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment.[1][14][15][16] Throughout the first decade of the Zionist movement, some Zionist figures, including Theodor Herzl, supported a Jewish state in several places such as "Uganda" (actually parts of British East Africa today in Kenya), Argentina, Cyprus, Mesopotamia, Mozambique, and the Sinai Peninsula.[17] But then most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired homeland in Palestine, then part of the Ottoman Empire.[18][19][20] This process was seen by the emerging Zionist movement as an "ingathering of exiles" (kibbutz galuyot), an effort to put a stop to the exoduses and persecutions that have marked Jewish history by bringing the Jewish people back to their historic homeland.[21]

From 1897 to 1948, the primary goal of the Zionist movement was to establish the basis for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and thereafter to consolidate it. In a unique variation of the principle of self-determination,[22] the Lovers of Zion united in 1884 and in 1897 the first Zionist congress was organized. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a large number of Jews immigrated to first Ottoman and later Mandatory Palestine, and at the same time, some international recognition and support was gained, notably in the 1917 Balfour Declaration by the United Kingdom. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Zionism has continued primarily to advocate on behalf of Israel and to address threats to its continued existence and security.

More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism

More on the history of the modern day political movement known as Zionism:

Theodor Herzl[a] (2 May 1860 – 3 July 1904)[3] was an Austro-Hungarian Jewish journalist, lawyer, writer, playwright and political activist who was the father of modern political Zionism. Herzl formed the Zionist Organization and promoted Jewish immigration to Palestine in an effort to form a Jewish state. Due to his Zionist work, he is known in Hebrew as Chozeh HaMedinah (חוֹזֵה הַמְדִינָה), lit. 'Visionary of the State'.[4][5] He is specifically mentioned in the Israeli Declaration of Independence and is officially referred to as "the spiritual father of the Jewish State".[6]

Herzl was born in Pest, Kingdom of Hungary, to a prosperous Neolog Jewish family. After a brief legal career in Vienna, he became the Paris correspondent for the Viennese newspaper Neue Freie Presse. Confronted with antisemitic events in Vienna, he reached the conclusion that anti-Jewish sentiment would make Jewish assimilation impossible, and that the only solution for Jews was the establishment of a Jewish state. In 1896, Herzl published the pamphlet Der Judenstaat, in which he elaborated his visions of a Jewish homeland. His ideas attracted international attention and rapidly established Herzl as a major figure in the Jewish world.

In 1897, Herzl convened the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, and was elected president of the Zionist Organization. He began a series of diplomatic initiatives to build support for a Jewish state, appealing unsuccessfully to German emperor Wilhelm II and Ottoman sultan Abdul Hamid II. At the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903, Herzl presented the Uganda Scheme, endorsed by Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain on behalf of the British government. The proposal, which sought to create a temporary refuge for the Jews in British East Africa following the Kishinev pogrom, was met with strong opposition and ultimately rejected. Herzl died of a heart ailment in 1904 at the age of 44, and was buried in Vienna. In 1949, his remains were taken to Israel and reinterred on Mount Herzl.

RayAmerica says

You are confusing the Biblical term "Zion"

2 Samuel (2 Sam 5:7) - King David established his capital on Mt. Zion, identified with one of the hills Jerusalem sits on.

Y'know, Jew-rusalem in Jew-dea. Not Arabsalem in Arab-dea

See also Psalm 137, a favorite topic for songs:

[1] By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.
[2] We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof.
[3] For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion.
[4] How shall we sing the LORD's song in a strange land?
[5] If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.
[6] If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy.
[7] Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Rase it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof.
[8] O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us.
[9] Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.

Part of that "recurring theme" in the OT.

Boney M "The Rivers of Babylon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3QxT-w3WMo

You dismiss Genesis Ray, that just means you will continue in ignorance.

You can quote mountains of ignorant propaganda, but it doesn’t change, nor ever will change the truth found in Genesis. An everlasting covenant.

Here is one part of it.
God's Promise to Abraham

Genesis 17
When Abram was 99 years old, the Lord appeared to him again and said, “I am God All-Powerful. If you obey me and always do right, 2 I will keep my solemn promise to you and give you more descendants than can be counted.” 3 Abram bowed with his face to the ground, and God said:

4-5 I promise that you will be the father of many nations. So now I'm changing your name from Abram to Abraham.[a] 6 I will give you a lot of descendants, and they will become great nations. Some of them will even be kings.

7 I will always keep the promise I have made to you and your descendants, because I am your God and their God. 8 I will give you and them the land in which you are now a foreigner. I will give the whole land of Canaan to your family forever, and I will be their God.

PeopleUnited says

No. You need to get your facts straight. Start in Genesis. We’ll wait...

After reading my posts on the creation of the secular/political movement known as Zionism, I'd love to hear your comments. (By the way, I assume you are referring to Genesis 12:3. You'll need to read Paul's epistles to the Galatians and much of Romans in order to interpret WHO that verse is actually describing).

Not one comment on the above history of the modern secular/political movement of modern day Zionism. I wonder why that is?

The Antichrist will rule from Rome.

The Messiah will rule from Jerusalem.

RayAmerica says

You'll need to read Paul's epistles to the Galatians and much of Romans in order to interpret WHO that verse is actually describing)

No one replaced the genetic descendants of Abraham. Read Revelation it will prove it to you.

RayAmerica says

Not one comment on the above history of the modern secular/political movement of modern day Zionism. I wonder why that is?

Because you're starting at the end, and we're starting at the beginning and why.

I guess the Greeks were bad for seeking to take their land back against the Ottomans in the 19th because they last time THEY ruled themselves was in the last century BC or so.

The descendants of Abraham in which the blessings were bestowed were on the REMNANT of the faithful, not on the disobedient that were merely the physical 'seed' of Abraham. Had they been the spiritual seed of Abraham, which is that they were believers in God's truth, they would have known who Jesus was, precisely what Jesus was declaring in the following exchange between him and physical 'seed:'

37 I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.

38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

The two of you are believing Dispensationalist theory that was invented in the 19th. Century, which elevates the non-believing, Christ rejecting Jewish people, above the true children of God, which are those, both Jew and Gentile alike, that are found in Christ.

From Galatians chapter 3:

6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

And ...

26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

The New Testament interprets and defines the meaning of much of the Old Testament. That is exactly what is being declared in the above Bible passages. It is defining who the true children of Abraham are, and it is not physical, unbelieving Israel. It is clearly defined as those that are in Christ.

RayAmerica says

The descendants of Abraham in which the blessings were bestowed were on the REMNANT of the faithful,

RayAmerica says

and it is not physical, unbelieving Israel. It is clearly defined as those that are in Christ.

That makes no sense.

"For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable" and the context is clearly in reference to the literal seed of Abraham.



It makes no sense in the "Church is Israel context".

"The Church, you yourselves are enemies of the Gospel. But They, which is really the Church of you Yourselves, are saved for the sake of the Patriarchs"?

"A partial hardening has come upon them, which is you the Church whom I'm also talking to? To make you, the Church believers jealous of themselves, since you are also Israel?"

So the Church is the enemy of the Gospel, but saved for the OT Patriarchs sake?

That's far from a plain reading, and one hell of a tendentious twisting.

Kulak,

I noticed that you didn't address the BIBLE passages above which clearly defines that the SEED of Abraham are those that are found in Christ.

When the Jews professed that THEY were the seed of Abraham to Christ, what was HIS response? He clearly was defining the seed as those that are of faith, not of those that are merely the physical seed.

Do I understand that you are saying that ALL JEWS, whether they are believers in Christ or not, are all saved?

RayAmerica says

I noticed that you didn't address the BIBLE passages above which clearly defines that the SEED of Abraham are those that are found in Christ.

Absolutely not. Go earlier in Romans for the Context, Romans 11:1-2 (NKJV):

I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying, 3 Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. 4 But what saith the answer of God unto him?https://app.logos.com/books/LLS%3AKJV1900/references/bible%2Bkjv.66.11.1?registration_source_host=biblia.com

ESV for comparison:
11 I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham,[a] a member of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the Scripture says of Elijah, how he appeals to God against Israel?
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+11%3A1-2&version=ESV

The Chapter STARTS with Paul addressing the Church when talking about the literal descendents - like himself - of Abraham.

Let me ask you a question - What tribe of Israel are you in? Benjamin? Judah?

Furthermore, what is the point of the story of the grafted on wild branch and the natural branches if not to contrast the Church in Christ with Physical Israel?

Romans 11 only makes sense if Israel means the physical Seed of Abraham, and "You" and "Grafted on wild olive branches" and "Church" means those in Christ.

You are choosing to completely ignore Paul's writings in Galatians (and Romans) as stated above, and, you've ignored the discourse between 'Abraham's seed' and Christ in John chapter 8.

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” - Gal. 3:28

What Paul is clearly saying is that the Jews are NOT cut off from Christ, but they are not in a higher position just because they were born Jews, as the verse above clearly declares.

Do you believe that ALL Jews are saved? Yes or No?

RayAmerica says

What Paul is clearly saying is that the Jews are NOT cut off from Christ, but they are not in a higher position just because they were born Jews, as the verse above clearly declares.

Paul is saying that Jews are PARTIALLY hardened until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, and then all of Israel will be saved.

It also warns Church members not to treat Jews with arrogance or hardness, lest they upset the Lord.

Because in the OT, except for very few exceptions (such as Rahab the harlot), salvation, via the prophets and the word, along with God's sovereign grace, was only made available to the Jews.

When the Jews predominantly rejected Christ as Messiah, God's grace was then also extended to the Gentiles. Both Jews and Gentiles equally need Christ, without which there is no real hope for anyone.

RayAmerica says

Do you believe that ALL Jews are saved? Yes or No?

Not what I think, it's what Jesus revealed to Paul.

It's literally, and in plain words, in the chapter I posted above.

Again, are you saying that that verse means that ALL ISRAEL, including those that reject Christ, will all be saved?

RayAmerica says

Again, are you saying that that verse means that ALL ISRAEL, including those that reject Christ, will all be saved?

Paul says the current members of the Church whom he is directly speaking to were consigned to disobedience so that they might be saved, and so "They" (who is clearly not those in the Church whom he just addressed) - might be shown mercy and ALL will be saved.

He comes out and says it bluntly.

He also says they will be saved for the sake of the promises made to the Patriarch, and God's Words are irrevokable. Even though for now they are enemies of the Gospel. He can't say it plainer.

From Romans Chapter 9:

6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.

8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

CLEARLY defines who "Israel" is, and, states emphatically that "not all Israel ... are Israel."

So, the 'all Israel shall be saved' is defined by the above!

This is why "Jews are cursed" websites and tweets avoid Romans, because if they mention it and people look it up, without the Replacement heretic trying to trick the plain meaning, they'll see the plain truth of the Mystery God revealed to Paul.

If "not all Israel ... is Israel," WHO is the Israel that shall ALL BE SAVED? It is the Israel of FAITH, and NOT the Children of the flesh.

I have news for you friend ... what I am declaring to be true is backed up by orthodox Christian doctrine that was 'replaced' by the fiction, invented primarily by John Nelson Darby, and made popular by the Scofield Reference Bible notes. Prior to that, Dispensationalist doctrines cannot be found anywhere in orthodox Christian writings or commentaries, going back all the way to the earliest writings and throughout history. It is a modern day invention, pure and simple.

What I find interesting is that Dispensationalism has always been scorned upon by European Christians, including, Charles Spurgeon, who viewed it as modern day heresy.