2
0

Fukushima Fish is Safe to Eat? Really?


 invite response                
2024 Jun 16, 8:48am   110 views  4 comments

by RayAmerica   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

U.S. Buying ‘Safe and Delicious’ Fukushima Fish Banned by Other Countries

Japan last month completed its fifth release into the Pacific Ocean of treated contaminated radioactive wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

Local fishing groups, residents, neighboring countries and many scientists and environmental organizations strongly oppose the discharges, citing concerns about the contaminated water’s effects on human and environmental health.

In an attempt to allay those concerns, Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida last September, following the first discharge, released a video clip of himself eating Fukushima fish, which he called “safe and delicious.”

And Japan’s economic minister, Yasutoshi Nishimura, ate sashimi in Tokyo for the news cameras. “It’s really the best!” he said, The New York Times reported.

That didn’t stop China, Russia and South Korea from banning the import of Japanese seafood, over concerns about radioactive contamination.

But the U.S. took a different tack. In October 2023, U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel announced the U.S. military would buy bulk Japanese seafood for service members stationed at military bases in Japan and explore more broadly how to help offset China’s ban on Japan’s seafood.

(Aren't you glad that we have the FDA looking out for our best interests?)

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fukushima-radioactive-wastewater-us-buying-fish-threaten-human-health/?utm_id=20240606

Comments 1 - 4 of 4        Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2024 Jun 16, 10:16am  

I think the dangers of Nuclear contamination are blown out of proportion. If you look at all of the areas that has experienced a Nuclear catastrophe over the last 80 years or so. Looking back we're not seeing the mutations and cancer cases to match the hyped dangers of such catastrophes.
Hiroshima, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukishima and so on. The dangers are greater during the event where the Nuclear material is wafting in the air, they are fairly heavy particles, and once they settle they don't get stirred up into the air again. The wild life in Chernobyl has returned seemingly unscathed, the breeding habits have not been interrupted as previously stated.
If the waters off Japan are contaminated and unsafe to consume seafood from those waters. Than it would be safe to assume that the contamination has spread to much of the pacific ocean as well. As what about the other sea creatures passing through those waters in their migration snacking on the sea-life in those those waters? Surely the whole Tuna industry would be unsafe to eat.

Aside from handling Nuclear materials, or being directly in a nuclear fall out zone during a catastrophe. I don't think the dangers of such long term effects are as imminent as previously thought. Though it would beneficial to study and understand the bottom feeders that would be most affected, and the predators that prey upon them. But I think the food chain that feeds from active sea snow, to plankton, to top water fry and their predators, are most likely safe to eat.
I wouldn't go eating sea floor crustacean, and reef feeding fish.
3   Ceffer   2024 Jun 16, 11:38am  

Supposedly one of those new age mini nukes with torsion triggers was placed on one of the Fukushima reactors by hired Israeli 'security experts'. Beware the Israeli 'security expert'. The PTB of course designated it an overheating core failure (the standard Rockefeller scare tactic to eliminate nuke power competition with petroleum).

The goal was to purposely create a massive fallout disaster in conjunction with the nuclear triggered earthquake and tidal wave in 2011. The Globalists were shaking down Japan to move industry, funds and population to North Korea. It was another instance of "Mother Nature isn't bad enough, let's enhance her disasters for war and blackmail".

The nuke generated tidal wave, like DEWs and HAARP, was a demonstration of environmental 'Trinity' testing. It worked. The Russians have a sub with a massive nuke whose only purpose is to generate a colossal tidal wave close to the target.

However, the fallout disaster didn't pan out on the scale that the perpetrators had hoped. All of the scare shit of the West Coast of USA being polluted by the currents never occurred.
4   Ceffer   2024 Jun 16, 11:56am  

"Moscow is under water"


Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions