patrick.net

I thought that presidential immunity for official acts was already written into the Constitution.

Patrick says

I thought that presidential immunity for official acts was already written into the Constitution.

Who says lawfare has anything to do with the Constitution. It's about inflicting massive expense, delay, negative press, slanderous pleadings and onerous restrictions built into the legal system. The legal system is weaponized against all of us, but the lawfare sorties are the bunker busters for selected figures and adversaries.

So, we have this grind to the Supreme Court perseverating the Constitution that already exists? The question is, why are there no penalties for the legal abusers who instead of acting as preservers of law and order, or executing their proper job as officers of the court, or serving as guard rails for the Constitution, we have political hacks perverting the process with impunity. The various political figures commit perjury in Congress so routinely that it is a laughable pastime.

Patrick says

I thought that presidential immunity for official acts was already written into the Constitution.

1) Libtarded Gamma Male rants about SCOTUS ruling on posted video.

2) Goes viral.

3) Forgets he has a deflated sex blowup doll on couch behind him.







^^^ Hint - Not her:

@Patrick be sure to add this ^^^ to the next memes dump. :)

It doesn't seem very meme-like.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/devastating-tuesday-july-2-2024-c

Let’s do a little thought experiment. Evidence shows President Obama was involved in the now-discredited Russia Dossier matter, which was used as a false predicate to spy on the Trump campaign for partisan political purposes. Evidence suggests Obama knew the Dossier was fake, purchased by the Clinton campaign. Yesterday’s new 3-tier test provides a clear procedure for prosecuting Obama for those very serious allegations.

In other words, the High Court incinerated de facto Presidential immunity, and replaced it with a clear de jure prosecutorial process. Former and future Presidents susceptible to more serious crimes than Trump’s are now fair game. ...

The irony! By bringing all these silly, creative claims against President Trump for keeping a few boxes of “classified documents,” and because his bookkeeper wrote the wrong thing on a check stub, the Supreme Court got an unprecedented opportunity to end forever the silent, implicit protection previously enjoyed by every other previous President. That de facto absolute immunity is gone, never to return.

And now it’s open season on serious crimes committed by Presidents.

If President Trump wins the election, this decision provides exactly the right tool his DOJ needs to prosecute the last twenty years of Presidential malfeasance and abuses of authority. It almost seems like Trump planned it this way. In hindsight, it couldn’t have gone any better for Trump in the big picture. When Trump’s DOJ brings its first charges against Biden and Obama, the media cannot wail about it being “unprecedented.” He’ll just be following the law.

Beyond those long-term benefits for President Trump, the decision also placed a massive granite capstone on out-of-control Presidential authority. All future Presidents, Trump included, must now consider potential criminal liability under the new Trump v. US standard. The new rule will make Presidents much more careful when acting outside their Constitutional authority, like when they mandate vaccine shots or something, just as a random example.

Mandating any injection must always be swiftly punished by hanging.