0
2

Fixing the Birthrate


 invite response                
2024 Jul 11, 7:11pm   305 views  14 comments

by AmericanKulak   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

The solution no woman wants to hear, not just Libtards but FauxTrads.

How many children did a Victorian, Colonial, or Medieval woman give birth to (not whether they lived or not)?

How is it China practiced female infanticide for 1000 years and was one of the most populous places on Earth?

Women married at 18 and were considered spinsters by 25.

Comments 1 - 14 of 14        Search these comments

1   FarmersWon   2024 Jul 11, 7:12pm  

White people need to have more kids.
They created good nations.
2   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Jul 11, 10:51pm  

AmericanKulak says


How many children did a Victorian, Colonial, or Medieval woman give birth to (not whether they lived or not)?


Yeah, because 90% of the world's population were farmers. Most of them subsistence farmers. Having lots of kids was your 'farm equipment'.

At least 60% of the world's population today live in cramped cities. Having lots of kids...or any at all...makes zero economic sense.
3   zzyzzx   2024 Jul 12, 6:10am  

Exactly what is broken? Less people = more affordable housing, less traffic, and less dependance on imported oil.
4   socal2   2024 Jul 12, 8:44am  

zzyzzx says

Exactly what is broken? Less people = more affordable housing, less traffic, and less dependance on imported oil.


The US and much of the West are already in negative birth rate territory.

The future belongs to those who bother to show up.

Who is going to pay for our massive entitlement liabilities if we have much fewer future taxpayers?

I don't want to have to continue importing 3rd world labor and dysfunction and pay much higher taxes to make for less Americans in the workforce.
5   zzyzzx   2024 Jul 12, 8:57am  

socal2 says

zzyzzx says


Exactly what is broken? Less people = more affordable housing, less traffic, and less dependance on imported oil.


The US and much of the West are already in negative birth rate territory.

The future belongs to those who bother to show up.

Who is going to pay for our massive entitlement liabilities if we have much fewer future taxpayers?

I don't want to have to continue importing 3rd world labor and dysfunction and pay much higher taxes to make for less Americans in the workforce.


I doubt anyone here actually needs social security or Medicare.
6   WookieMan   2024 Jul 12, 9:25am  

zzyzzx says

I doubt anyone here actually needs social security or Medicare.

Aren't you Baltimore area? As a former Chicagoan 70-80% of the population is broke. I'm sure it's the same besides the DC wealthy.

On this forum you're probably correct. We all probably don't "need" it but will take it. We paid into it. We pay $10k+ per year. Max out basically with the wife and I kick in about half that. I personally don't pay as much, but have in the past. We pay the median family income in SS, taxes, property taxes, Medicare, 401k and Roth.

I don't want to hear poor people bitch when I pay $80k and still have to raise a family while they get hand outs. Fuck you.
7   HeadSet   2024 Jul 12, 10:00am  

zzyzzx says

Exactly what is broken? Less people = more affordable housing, less traffic, and less dependance on imported oil.

Correct. A stabilized population is long term supportable with a 1st world lifestyle.
8   HeadSet   2024 Jul 12, 10:05am  

socal2 says

Who is going to pay for our massive entitlement liabilities if we have much fewer future taxpayers?

So, what happens when the population hits 500 million? Keep growing to 750 million to support the elderly part of the 500 million? Then to over a billion? Build on all green spaces, fish out the seas, cluster everyone into rabbit warren structures?
9   Ceffer   2024 Jul 12, 11:09am  

Crop dusters with birth control agents over Feminist rallies is a good start. Chemtrails are too diffuse and slow.

Gates mosquitos filled with estrogens and testosterone blockers as well as toxic vaccines could help. Men will have bodacious tits, but they won't live long.
10   Ceffer   2024 Jul 12, 11:19am  

Hasn't the CIA invented EMP guns that can selectively fragment the eggs and embryos of passing women en masse without their knowledge? I know a few places where that might come in handy.
11   AmericanKulak   2024 Jul 12, 11:24am  

Eliminate HoeFare.
12   socal2   2024 Jul 12, 12:10pm  

HeadSet says


So, what happens when the population hits 500 million? Keep growing to 750 million to support the elderly part of the 500 million? Then to over a billion? Build on all green spaces, fish out the seas, cluster everyone into rabbit warren structures?


Are you talking about America?

Where in the world are you getting your info? We are already set for declining population in the US even with some modest immigration additions.

Honestly, I thought only Leftist and environmental whackos were the ones still believing in the overpopulation myth?


13   AmericanKulak   2024 Jul 12, 12:36pm  

socal2 says


We are already set for declining population in the US even with some modest immigration additions.

Something like 15-20% of Americans are foreign born like the 20s-30s, except unlike the 20s they are nowhere near overwhelmingly European in origin and our GDP isn't growing 7% a year with Sandusky, OH seeing 3 new tool & die plants open every year.

However, some good news is that large numbers of immigrants are like people moving to Florida: 3 of 5 end up going home. The problem is many of the worst welfare cheats that do stay begin chain migration of ne'er do well family members from Peshawar and Caracas.

socal2 says


Honestly, I thought only Leftist and environmental whackos were the ones still believing in the overpopulation myth?

I agree. And we are going to have a demographically driven housing collapse.

One thing Western Civ does have a legit problem is "All or Nothing, 0 or 1, excluded middle fallacy". This is why a sprinkle of multcult is a good thing, but too much is bad and too little can contribute to stagnation. We should shoot for 5% foreign born in our population, or put another way, cut ALL immigration by 66%. In fact we should have a decade of no immigration, except for some H1Bs, limit them to masters degree and above, and require sponsors to pay $100k for the H1b Visa, to insure it's really a shortage, and not used as a wage busting tool.

It's not in the general interest to have a rapid asset appreciating but low wage enivronment, that's a recipe to become the 3rd world.

(Off topic rant about "Right to Work" somehow including mandatory overtime for non-Emergency personnel when an excellent, proven Free Market solution called 'shift pay differental' is guaranteed to work.)
14   HeadSet   2024 Jul 12, 3:01pm  

socal2 says


Where in the world are you getting your info? We are already set for declining population in the US even with some modest immigration additions.

We are NOT seeing a population decline, maybe a lower rate of increase, but still an increase.



Even so, espousing a need for enough new people to pay for retirees implies the level of growth I mentioned in my post.

socal2 says


I thought only Leftist and environmental whackos were the ones still believing in the overpopulation myth

I am not talking about a starving world. I am saying that we cannot have a 1st world lifestyle in the US if we allow the population to grow to a level that would strain resources.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste