patrick.net

Very interesting. The Republic's undoing could come down to insurance.

WookieMan says

clambo says

I hope they throw a couple of cops/secret service guys in jail for criminal negligence; I predict the familes of the dead guy will be suing someone soon.

It's bigger than that though. Trump rallies have to have insurance. Those rates likely just increased X10. They could have just put 20 more full time SS agents on his duty and saved money. Now the tax payers are going to eat it and/or the Trump campaign.

Part of me wonders if that was part of the plan. Could prevent him from campaigning in certain locations if he wants to rally in purple/blue areas in swing states. Venues might flat out deny him from an event. Or jack up prices to make it impossible or unlikely to stage an event. People shooting and killing people is kind of problematic for venues.

He can't self-insure?

https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1818363509937467806

Patrick says

https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1818363509937467806

SERVES THAT CIA OPERATIVE RIGHT!!!!

RWSGFY says

He can't self-insure?

He can but at what cost? I don't know the game. I just know his prices however it's paid for went through the roof. Back of napkin event is probably $100k pre-assassination. Might be $1M now. Not talking deducible either. Someone was killed at his event. Not saying J6 was his fault, but insurance carriers don't care when people are dying with Trump events. They charge more. Or don't give coverage.

You gotta think of all the deep state shit. It's an easy way to get him off the campaign. If he can't campaign in places he needs to then people cannot bitch about voter fraud. They can just say he didn't campaign there. These fuckers are crafty. Factor in the court cases. Assassination. It's obvious as fuck what is going down.

WookieMan says

RWSGFY says

He can't self-insure?

He can but at what cost? I don't know the game. I just know his prices however it's paid for went through the roof. Back of napkin event is probably $100k pre-assassination. Might be $1M now. Not talking deducible either. Someone was killed at his event. Not saying J6 was his fault, but insurance carriers don't care when people are dying with Trump events. They charge more. Or don't give coverage.

You gotta think of all the deep state shit. It's an easy way to get him off the campaign. If he can't campaign in places he needs to then people cannot bitch about voter fraud. They can just say he didn't campaign there. These fuckers are crafty. Factor in the court cases. Assassination. It's obvious as fuck what is going down.

I'm no expert, but afaik self-insurance is either depositing some amount of money into government coffers ($35K in CA if you want to skip carrying a car insurance) or just signing some kind of paper (like Hertz does it). Should be be the same with that event insurance: deposit couple of mil into some escrow acct and you're gtg. If nothing happens you get it back. Could be talking out of my ass, though.

Require all attendees sign a waiver?

GNL says

Require all attendees wear body armor?

Fixed it for you!

GNL says

Require all attendees sign a waiver?

Not a bad idea and maybe they do. The other thing is I don't know if tickets are sold for these rallies. If it's free then someone has to pay the insurance if a tragedy happens or you get sued by an attendee. Usually the person having the event pays something.

RWSGFY says

Should be be the same with that event insurance: deposit couple of mil into some escrow acct and you're gtg. If nothing happens you get it back. Could be talking out of my ass, though.

Sounds logical. But some of that money is taken regardless otherwise how does the insurance company make money? The amount I have no clue. I was just throwing out numbers.

Either way it's likely to make campaigning more expensive for Trump. He has the money to handle it, but some venues might not allow him and he might not be able to campaign in key locations. I just think it's another avenue to thwart his campaign. They've thrown everything at the guy. Wouldn't be surprised if this is another one.

https://slaynews.com/news/whistleblower-exposes-secret-service-cover-up-ronald-rowe-personally-ordered-agents-cut-trump-rally/

Whistleblower Exposes Secret Service Cover-Up: Ronald Rowe ‘Personally’ Ordered Agents Cut from Trump Rally

A Secret Service whistleblower has just dropped explosive new allegations to expose a major cover-up at the federal agency regarding the events surrounding the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump.

Secret Service Acting Director Ronald Rowe testified that the agency didn’t cut resources from Trump’s security detail.

However, a whistleblower has now alleged that Rowe “personally directed” agents to be cut from Trump’s protection.

If true, the whistleblower’s allegations mean Rowe lied before Congress.

The whistleblower reportedly provided the information to Republican Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO).

I love that Trump has them running around like headless, lying chickens. I hope that bodes well for his administration.

Pundit Juan O Savin stated that the photographer who used a high frame rate camera, which allegedly recorded a bullet trace past Trump's head at the Pennsylvania killing field, was the same photographer who set up the set piece with the black teacher and black students the day Shrubbie got the ear whisper about the execution of the 9/11 false flag.

So, were the assassins planning to enjoy an extremely slo mo of Trump's head getting splatted? There was absolutely no reason to be using a high frame rate camera in that context.

Was it team Trump who wanted the high frame rate camera to validate the attempt? Was it photoshopped? Curious minds would like to know.

https://blissandblisters.substack.com/p/attempted-assassination-anomalies

The cops reacted cautiously to the sniper because they told the USSS to cover the roof, and probably believed the sniper was an agent at first.


https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1821644193774686497

Footage of roof climb revealed.



I have a feeling the local PD knows the FIB is going to try to blame them for the failed responsibility of the USSS, so they're leaking.

Sloped roof. Lol. Apparently no one on the USSS has been on a roof? That is child's play. You fall off that you're a retard.

It's more obvious day by day it was a setup. Get some moron with suicidal thoughts to shoot at a former POTUS. Thinking he'll be some hero. There's people that know what happened. It's not the 60's anymore. There's a trail to follow. Some people are likely needing to clean their underwear.

All we are going to get is branching versions of disinformation and distraction resulting in a chaos of NADA.

There was never a proper forensics around the alleged patsy, all bizarre half assed theater. Somebody took the blurred footage of his face and was able to use computer pixel analysis to reconstruct a clear picture, and it wasn't Crooks, it was the other guy they first showed in the closeup, probably some kid shot through the head at close range (maybe from a morgue, drug deal gone bad?) and plopped up there to be patsy. However, he and Crooks do not look enough alike to make the mistake of confusing them.

I don't waste my time on any of their alleged movies, the whole thing was a theatrical fake.

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/suspicions-rise-as-new-footage-shows-secret-service-helping-adjust-trump-shooters-scope

https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1821669119978066305

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/expensive-things-friday-august-9

Yesterday, Fox ran a story headlined, “Fuming police officer says he told Secret Service to secure Trump shooter building days before rally: bodycam.” Once again showing a level of transparency the Secret Service could only dream of, assuming it could get to sleep in the first place, Butler County’s Police Department released its July 13th bodycam footage. Once again, the story changed. Once again, things got murkier.

The first new fact revealed in the story is that they still don’t know how Crooks got onto the roof. The bodycam shows officers wondering whether Crooks used a thin wooden pallet leaning against the warehouse wall to scale the side of the building (carrying a rifle). But more than that, it became clear they only have theories for how Crooks got up there without help.

The footage also shows the officer arriving on the scene at around 18:12 p.m., about a minute after Crooks was shot
dead by a countersniper. The officer is desperately looking to scale the building and asks a fellow officer if there was
a ladder he could climb.
"No, he used that board right there probably," the other officer says, with the video showing a stack of wooden pallets
resting against the side of the building. It's not clear if Crooks used those pallets to climb on top of the building.
Previous reports revealed that Crooks had purchased a ladder at a local Home Depot, but no ladder was found at the
scene.

In other words, the officers: (1) could not get onto the roof without help. So how did Crooks do it without help? (2) They still don’t know how Crooks got up there, it’s all guesses. (3) The ladder Crooks bought at Home Depot is still missing. Could it have been removed by someone?

The officer manages to hoist two countersnipers onto the roof by helping them onto a large storage shed, and they
then use a pallet on the roof of the shed to access the roof. The pallet had initially been resting against the building
next to the storage shed and could also have been used by Crooks.

The second major development was that one of the officers at the scene can be heard repeatedly and angrily telling others that days before, he’d warned the Secret Service to put someone on the roof. “I told the Secret Service, post a f---ing guy over here. I told them that f---ing at the meeting on Tuesday,” he said.

Several minutes of the bodycam video are available at the article’s link, starting at the top and then scattered through the article. See what you think.

The Venn diagram of places a 20 yo thin guy can climb is a big circle around the Venn diagram of places your typical fat 40 yo popo in body armor can climb.

Good prediction, though I have to say a lot of people expected the DNC/CIA to try it.

Trump supporter who has been to 22 Trump rallies told an interviewer that this was the ONLY rally he had been to where they were not vetting, searching or giving background checks for anyone getting near the stage the night before. Another says that he could drive straight through and he had to walk around just to find anyone. How does anyone explain this other than the fact that it looks like a complete set up from the very beginning?
"I was here Friday night for the volunteer set up. I was able to drive my vehicle right and park five feet from the stage. I was never searched or nothing. I've never saw that before I mean volunteered at plenty of (Trump) events and this is the first time I was able to drive right up to the stage. So you've covered other Trump events before? Yeah twenty two of them. So they're typically locked down thirty-six hours prior to the rally. This was still completely unlocked twelve hours prior to the rally. Usually, your search, vetted, background checks to even get anywhere near that place Friday night. None of that happened.

https://rumble.com/v5ay10s-no-security-no-vetting-no-background-checks-at-trump-assassination-attempt-.html


original link

https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1823907656941142106