patrick.net

Rollo Tomassi needs to be placed in a cage pit with some immense hirsute lesbians and trannies all armed with table legs. He will soon be struggle sessioned immaculate.

I imagine anybody who manages to get a significant slice of media traction at some level and have an editorial slant will find themselves 'supported' and pied piper'd by vested interests to prompt them higher in viewerships and media efforts if they support a propagandist viewpoint. Every little bit counts.

I think one of the reasons Patnet hasn't been attacked more is because it hasn't been analyzed as having sufficient traction in the scheme of things to matter so much, it is too far off the media beaten tracks. I guess lucky us so far, yet even here the glowies glow on occasion.

In a decade, hardly a dozen people have been killed by "Incels", and that's being generous, counting schizos and moderate to severe mentally handicapped as "incels".

This year so far, 54 kids have been raped by female Public School Teachers.

Guess which group the DHS is worried about?

Yep, GB"I" is a thing:

https://x.com/realpeteyb123/status/1994066051663839595

@realpeteyb123
Hey influencers, here is one of your final warnings…

If a company pays you to repost quote or amplify their content you must disclose it.

It does not matter if you are not selling a product or telling anyone to buy anything.

Under FTC rules payment plus amplification equals an endorsement.

Money, credits, favors future deals or coordinated messaging all count as “material connections”

If that connection is not clearly disclosed it is deceptive advertising.

You cannot hide behind reposts vague language or “just sharing.”

Both the influencer and the company are liable.

Trying to be discreet does not make it compliant.

It makes it illegal.

Nov 27, 2025