« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
The moderators are lying, too, with the presumptions of their questions in which the conclusion (propaganda) is contained in the question.
Why the hell did anyone waste their time on this?
VP debates don't effect the election outcome worth shit.
They have shown to move the needle by less than a percent nationally, by a bit more on the state level. If you trust the polling historically
In general, debates don’t matter that much for presidential votes. Debates are important in inverse proportion to the importance of the office. So, for instance, in presidential debates, most voters know already who they’re leaning to vote for because of political polarization. But if you get down to, say, congressional seats, they may not know as much about members of Congress, and so they learn more about the individual candidates.
Presidential primaries can have large fields of candidates. Voters may not know a lot about each one, and so there is an opportunity for a candidate to say something, or to act in a way that sticks in voters’ minds and makes them think more positively about them.
CBS Shut Off Vance's Mic After He Mentioned "CBP One" App, Allowing Illegals To Apply Online For "Asylum" To Fast Track Them Into The Country
mell says
They have shown to move the needle by less than a percent nationally, by a bit more on the state level. If you trust the polling historically
No. Studies have shown that debates in general do not matter in effecting election outcomes. The Trump-Biden one is a historic exception to that rule, of course.
CBS Shut Off Vance's Mic After He Mentioned "CBP One" App, Allowing Illegals To Apply Online For "Asylum" To Fast Track Them Into The Country
They have been shown to move the needle by less than one percent nationally, potentially more in swing states due to smaller numbers of voters, so in a close election they can matter. US elections have become quite closer, with the exception of Bush v Gore (recount).
mell says
They have been shown to move the needle by less than one percent nationally, potentially more in swing states due to smaller numbers of voters, so in a close election they can matter. US elections have become quite closer, with the exception of Bush v Gore (recount).
Bullshit. Close elections happen no matter what. Have NOTHING to do with the debates. Also, the majority of ppl who even watch the debates only do so for the first 20 - 30 mins only.
"Debates matter!" is just 100% Grade A copium bullshit that political junkies say to themselves. True.
Sorry dude. I used to fall into that trap myself.
mell says
They have been shown to move the needle by less than one percent nationally, potentially more in swing states due to smaller numbers of voters, so in a close election they can matter. US elections have become quite closer, with the exception of Bush v Gore (recount).
Bullshit. Close elections happen no matter what. Have NOTHING to do with the debates. Also, the majority of ppl who even watch the debates only do so for the first 20 - 30 mins only.
"Debates matter!" is just 100% Grade A copium bullshit that political junkies say to themselves. True.
Sorry dude. I used to fall into that trap myself.
Dan Quayle begs to differ.
Nixon too.
Just telling you what the polls historically show
Veep debates, even less. How many Americans do you think are not even aware WHO is the current Veep right now? Yes, even though she's running for POTUS?
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://rumble.com/v5es7od-real-americas-voice-247.html