Cancer, diabetes, AIDS... are the cash cows that mainstream big pharmaceutical companies use to make money. The new crown vaccine💉 causes cancer and then plans to launch expensive cancer treatment drugs. /. France🇫🇷Freelance health reporter: Han Rongli 癌症、糖尿病、艾滋病…,是主流大药厂借此赚钱的摇钱树💰新冠疫苗💉导致癌症进而布局推出昂贵的癌症治疗药物。/。法国🇫🇷自由健康记者:韩荣利 … … The Evolution And Validation Of The Metabolic Theory Of Cancer For the past 70 years the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) guided all research and treatment in cancer. Why are so few aware that it was overturned 15 years ago by the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC)? PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA NOV 4
In my last post of this series on cancer, I summarized the history of the scientific discoveries which led to the current consensus theory on the cause of cancer which is called the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT). I concluded by presenting evidence from the Human Genome Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas Project that emerged in the last 15 years which paradoxically, instead of confirming its validityy, instead contradicted it.
I suggest you read that first post on the SMT before delving into the current post which traces the history and evolution of the competing, and in my and other’s opinion, more scientifically valid theory called the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC). Please know that this post was highly informed by the amazing books by Travis Christofferson (Tripping Over the Truth or what I will reference below as TOTT), Thomas Seyfried (Cancer As a Metabolic Disease), and Siddhartha Mukherjee (The Emperor of All Maladies). I ask those authors for forgiveness if I mis-referenced or failed to reference statements made below as I wrote much of it from memory and notes.
My other cancer posts are:
The History Of My Newfound Interest In Treating Cancer The Prevailing Scientific Theory Of Cancer Has Been Overturned The Scientific Basis For The Somatic Mutation Theory Is Invalid If you have not read the previous posts, I will quickly review and summarize the conceptual foundation of the two competing theories so you can better understand this post.
SMT adherents believe that cancer arises solely from direct DNA damage, i.e. carcinogens cause mutations in the DNA contained in the chromosomes in the nucleus. These mutations then drive the cell to adopt “cancerous” properties, of which there are 8:
1. it stimulates its own growth
2. it evades growth suppressing signals
3. it resists cell death (apoptosis)
4. it enables replicative immortality
5. it induces the ability to grow new blood vessels to further tumor growth (angiogenesis)
6. it spreads to distant sites (metastasis)
7. it evades the immune system
8. it has a “reprogramming of energy metabolism”
Meanwhile, MTOC adherents believe that cancer results from injury to the mitochondria (the energy forming unit of the cell which is in the cytoplasm). They focus on the fact that all cancer cells, instead of using oxygen to make energy, rely on glucose for energy, something that occurs only when mitochondria are damaged. … …
癌症、糖尿病、艾滋病…,是主流大药厂借此赚钱的摇钱树💰新冠疫苗💉导致癌症进而布局推出昂贵的癌症治疗药物。/。法国🇫🇷自由健康记者:韩荣利
… …
The Evolution And Validation Of The Metabolic Theory Of Cancer
For the past 70 years the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) guided all research and treatment in cancer. Why are so few aware that it was overturned 15 years ago by the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC)?
PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA
NOV 4
https://open.substack.com/pub/pierrekory/p/the-evolution-and-validation-of-the
READ IN APP
In my last post of this series on cancer, I summarized the history of the scientific discoveries which led to the current consensus theory on the cause of cancer which is called the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT). I concluded by presenting evidence from the Human Genome Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas Project that emerged in the last 15 years which paradoxically, instead of confirming its validityy, instead contradicted it.
I suggest you read that first post on the SMT before delving into the current post which traces the history and evolution of the competing, and in my and other’s opinion, more scientifically valid theory called the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC). Please know that this post was highly informed by the amazing books by Travis Christofferson (Tripping Over the Truth or what I will reference below as TOTT), Thomas Seyfried (Cancer As a Metabolic Disease), and Siddhartha Mukherjee (The Emperor of All Maladies). I ask those authors for forgiveness if I mis-referenced or failed to reference statements made below as I wrote much of it from memory and notes.
My other cancer posts are:
The History Of My Newfound Interest In Treating Cancer
The Prevailing Scientific Theory Of Cancer Has Been Overturned
The Scientific Basis For The Somatic Mutation Theory Is Invalid
If you have not read the previous posts, I will quickly review and summarize the conceptual foundation of the two competing theories so you can better understand this post.
SMT adherents believe that cancer arises solely from direct DNA damage, i.e. carcinogens cause mutations in the DNA contained in the chromosomes in the nucleus. These mutations then drive the cell to adopt “cancerous” properties, of which there are 8:
1. it stimulates its own growth
2. it evades growth suppressing signals
3. it resists cell death (apoptosis)
4. it enables replicative immortality
5. it induces the ability to grow new blood vessels to further tumor growth (angiogenesis)
6. it spreads to distant sites (metastasis)
7. it evades the immune system
8. it has a “reprogramming of energy metabolism”
Meanwhile, MTOC adherents believe that cancer results from injury to the mitochondria (the energy forming unit of the cell which is in the cytoplasm). They focus on the fact that all cancer cells, instead of using oxygen to make energy, rely on glucose for energy, something that occurs only when mitochondria are damaged. … …
癌症代谢理论的演变与验证
在过去的 70 年里,体细胞突变理论 (SMT) 指导着所有癌症研究和治疗。 为什么很少有人知道它在 15 年前就被癌症代谢理论 (MTOC) 推翻了?
皮埃尔·科里,MD,MPA
11 月 4 日
在应用程序中阅读
在这个关于癌症的系列的最后一篇文章中,我总结了科学发现的历史,这些发现导致了当前关于癌症原因的共识理论,即体细胞突变理论(SMT)。 最后,我提供了过去 15 年中出现的人类基因组计划和癌症基因组图谱计划的证据,这些证据非但没有证实其有效性,反而与之相矛盾。
我建议您先阅读关于 SMT 的第一篇文章,然后再深入研究当前的文章,该文章追溯了竞争的历史和演变,在我和其他人看来,更科学有效的理论称为癌症代谢理论 (MTOC)。 请注意,这篇文章的内容来自特拉维斯·克里斯托弗森(Travis Christofferson)(绊倒真相或我在下面提到的 TOTT)、托马斯·塞弗里德(Thomas Seyfried)(癌症作为代谢性疾病)和悉达多·穆克吉(Siddhartha Mukherjee)(万病之王)的精彩书籍。 。 如果我错误引用或未能引用下面的陈述,我请那些作者原谅,因为我根据记忆和笔记写下了其中的大部分内容。
我的其他癌症帖子是:
我对治疗癌症的新兴趣的历史
流行的癌症科学理论已被推翻
体细胞突变理论的科学基础是无效的
如果您还没有阅读之前的文章,我将快速回顾和总结这两种竞争理论的概念基础,以便您可以更好地理解这篇文章。
SMT 的拥护者认为,癌症完全是由直接 DNA 损伤引起的,即致癌物质导致细胞核染色体中的 DNA 发生突变。 这些突变随后会驱动细胞产生“癌”特性,其中有 8 种:
1.刺激自身成长
2.它逃避生长抑制信号
3.它抵抗细胞死亡(细胞凋亡)
4.它能够实现复制永生
5.它诱导生长新血管以进一步肿瘤生长(血管生成)的能力
6. 扩散到远处(转移)
7.它逃避免疫系统
8.它具有“能量代谢的重新编程”
与此同时,MTOC 的拥护者认为癌症是由线粒体(位于细胞质中的细胞能量形成单位)损伤引起的。 他们关注的事实是,所有癌细胞都不使用氧气来产生能量,而是依赖葡萄糖来获取能量,这种情况只有在线粒体受损时才会发生。… …