patrick.net

Let me get this straight. You like the possibility of having lots of these...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_longevity_of_service

The problem isn't those overly tenured "Elected" officials. The problem is the quality of political opponents in their primaries before the election.
To just callously call "Un Fair!" and demand their removal just because how long they have been there, is foolish. To what end, to end up with AOC or Latoya What's her race, "Injected" into the seat, because the people in those districts, didn't trust the opposition in previous elections, they wont blindly support him in an election stemmed from political manipulation, just because of preconceived ageism? Those voters will sit it out, and the Commies or Rinos will win.

If you really want change, then get involved with your local party and help be the gatekeeper of the quality of candidates that runs in the primaries and elections. 90% of every Primary challenger in most Republican districts around the country. Are professional candidates, they are given money to run, and hype the voters into thinking there are alternatives. But they don't spend one thin cent on campaigning or trying to get elected. They don't do one single television spot, they don't say one single negative word about the incumbents or how their policy would be better. If they even outline a policy.

I'm all for cognitive and even IQ tests for all elected officials and even potential candidates. But I'm 100% against blindly removing effective leadership, that has no realistic challengers in their hometown. And just throw them out, because some pimple faced punk let some boomer child molester convince them that old people are all dumb as fuck and how brilliant the FOMO generation is and can do better.

Piss the fuck off with that stupid shit. I would take Thomas Sowell even in his 90's over 90% of anyone in Congress under the age of 35.

The difference in me and folks who believe it, is they have been brainwashed by the media that hates Trump. Trump is past what anyone would call his prime. Do you really want a political system that would have saddled us with Kamala Harris, because Trump was too old to run?

Really? Low IQ much?

Chuck Grassley was a horrible example to make your point, just a piss poor option, horrendously stupid.

Chuck Grassley would be exhibit number fucking one, I would hold up to defend experienced candidates.

He's been a solid warrior compared to Lindsey Graham, and he is no where near the monster that Schumer and Pelosi are.
In fact, I would bet that if he, Schumer and Nancy had to take a cognitive test, he would be the only one that passed it.

Grassley is just more proof of the quality of candidates that run to oppose him. You don't actually think Grassley's office is manipulating local and state elections to keep his seat like Democrats do, do you? Unlike Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and the like who actually do. It's the election security and integrity that is the most important issue facing our election today. Don't let the commies confuse you into thinking it's about old farts.
Have an honest election we can all believe in, then let those experienced candidates speak for themselves, by their win or lose.

Who is anyone from districts on the other side of the country, to dictate to voters in Grassley's district who to vote for?

And if Pelosi and Schumer and the like are actually being elected by their voters, then more power to them, but there still at least should be a cognitive test.

Grassley has done more to expose the hypocrisy and lies against Trump and has unmasked the DOJ weaponization against Trump more than anyone in Congress or the Senate. Jim Jordan, nor Matt Goetz says a damn word until Chuck Grassley spoke up.

Don't believe me go back and watch the congressional hearings all through Biden's term. He was the first to break ranks.