« First « Previous Comments 51 - 90 of 91 Next » Last » Search these comments
Christine Grady, Wife Of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Among Many Fired From NIH In Massive Purge
Woah - SNAP is about 25% of Coke's revenue!?
Woah - SNAP is about 25% of Coke's revenue!?
They killed his father and his uncle (and possibly his nephew). How credible would a threat to him now to do the same to him and his family be?
Yesterday, the Boston Globe ran a story headlined, “RFK Jr. will order ‘placebo’ testing for new vaccines, alarming health experts.” What would we do without alarmed health experts? Is there any other kind? Anyway, not only was the Globe’s article another fine example of journalistic malpractice, but for careful readers, it accidentally cut the vaccine industrial complex’s femoral artery.
On some future day, aging medical school doctors will look back on our time, and tell their fresh-faced students how, back in the day, pharma firms used to test vaccines by leaving them out overnight and seeing whether they were still there in the morning. If the wee vaccine fairies didn’t spirit the needles away in the small hours, then Bob’s your uncle: approved.
I exaggerate, but just barely.
Yesterday, Secretary Kennedy and HHS made what could be the simplest but most impactful announcement in American history (if you count in total life-years-saved). From now on, with limited exceptions (like the annual flu shot), the FDA will require all vaccines —including those already on the schedule— to be tested against an inert placebo, like pure saline.
“All new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure — a radical departure from past practices,” an HHS spokesperson told The Washington Post. ...
You trusted that they were doing the work. You gullible dopes actually believed they weren’t just chanting “supercalifragilistic” ten times and hoping for the best.
But no. Here’s the giveaway: despite the article’s main theme was about how testing against placebos alarms experts, the Globe never bothered to explain how vaccines are currently tested. If non-placebo testing is so wonderful, then why didn’t that information come first, right up front? But that bit was conspicuously absent, concealed behind empty technical jargon and meaningless buzzwords like “correlates of protection” and “biological responses.”
Nearly every other drug except for vaccines must succeed against a placebo. But under long-standing FDA regulations, vaccines are excepted. ...
Not only that, but they don’t even test for efficacy anymore by measuring whether the drug actually reduces the disease or prevents hospitalizations. They just test whether victims’ immune systems produce certain antibodies. If so, they assume that also means fewer people will be hospitalized for the disease, which is a classic but oddly-named logical fallacy called “begging the question.”
They know it’s circular reasoning, yet they all keep pretending “everything is going to be fine.”
But now it’s all over. Placebos are back! You are probably feeling relieved and thinking, good, at least we have that debate settled, glad we have all behind us now. Sorry! Au contraire, mon ami. We must now deal with the experts. ...
Michael Osterholm, the University of Minnesota infectious-disease expert on Biden’s transition team, said the change _threatened the existence of coronavirus vaccines_. I’m not sure Osterholm realized what he was admitting there. If covid jabs can’t survive a placebo-controlled trial, then… they shouldn’t be sold. Again, it’s common sense, doc. ...
The Globe and the rest of corporate media studiously ignored a very basic problem with all the experts’ arguments: the simple fact that all other drugs require placebo testing. So any ethics concerns, delays in releasing, additional expense, and ‘risks’ of non-approval are equally applicable to all other medicines. Somehow, for all other drugs except vaccines, placebo testing is considered not just acceptable but de rigueur.
What jab experts need to explain isn’t why placebo trials are ‘too risky’ — it’s why vaccines get a hall pass while new blood thinners, cancer drugs, and antidepressants must run the full gauntlet. If a heart drug that could save millions is required to beat a sugar pill in a fair fight, why not a shot you’re giving to a perfectly healthy infant? ...
The experts aren’t afraid that RFK Jr. is wrong— they’re afraid he’s right. They are terrified the public might start noticing how little scrutiny vaccines have actually received compared to every other drug on the market. If experts were confident in the science, they’d welcome placebo trials as vindication. Fine, go ahead and do your little placebo trials, you’ll see we were right all along. Their panic tells you they’re not afraid of being disproven — they’re afraid of being exposed.
This simple policy change was much more than a first step. It was a seismic move. With only a little luck, it could change everything.
HHS Halts Deadly Disease Research at Fort Detrick BSL-4 Biolab in 'Safety Stand-Down'
Decision follows "identification and documentation of personnel issues involving contract staff that compromised the facility's safety culture."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Health and Human Services (HHS) has ordered the halt to deadly disease research conducted at the Integrated Research Facility (IRF), located within Fort Detrick, a U.S. Army base in Frederick, Maryland.
Fort Detrick has long served as the U.S. military’s bioweapons epicenter—where government scientists conducted classified gain-of-function research, aerosolized virus dispersion trials, and weaponization of deadly pathogens like anthrax, plague, tularemia, and Ebola under secretive programs such as the U.S. Army’s Special Operations Division and Project Jefferson, much of it hidden behind black budgets and shielded from congressional oversight.
The facility’s director, Connie Schmaljohn, has been placed on administrative leave, according to a Wednesday WIRED report.
Moderna Pulls Application for FDA Approval of Flu-COVID Shot After FDA Calls for New Clinical Trials
Moderna is withdrawing its application for FDA approval of its mRNA-1083 combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, the company announced today.
Pfizer, Moderna Must Add Stronger Warnings About Possible Heart Damage From COVID Vaccines, FDA Says
The vaccine makers must expand information about the age groups at risk and warn that myocardial damage has commonly been long-lasting among those who suffer vaccine-related myocarditis, the FDA said.
Pfizer and Moderna must revise their COVID-19 vaccine labels to include more detailed warnings about the risks of heart damage, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Wednesday.
Letters issued to both companies state that post-marketing analysis shows greater risks than previously indicated for myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, which refers to inflammation of the sac-like membrane surrounding the heart.
Concurrently, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is considering removing these products from the childhood vaccine schedule, stating on April 23, 2025: "The recommendation for children was always dubious... So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk?"
What the MAHA Report Got Right—and What It Refused to Say
Processed food, chemical exposures, screens, drugs, and hypervaccination are fueling the chronic disease epidemic—but the MAHA Report stays silent on the elephant in the room. ...
But notably absent from the report is any mention of the catastrophic and deadly COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign—perhaps the most urgent medical crisis of all. The FDA recently revealed their plan to continue pushing mRNA injections upon a large portion of the American population which are labeled as “high-risk”...
On Tuesday, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Stated that COVID-19 vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women in the CDC’s immunization guidelines.
This change follows last year's push by the Biden administration to boost healthy children despite no clinical data supporting repeat boosters in that group.
The FDA is overhauling its COVID-19 vaccine approvals, with plans to limit future shots to older adults and those at higher risk of serious illness.
... the CDC’s vaccine recommendation schedule had not been updated online as of Tuesday morning.
Today on the Ultimate Human Podcast with Gary Brecka, RFK Jr. stated:
“We're probably going to stop publishing in the Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and those other journals because they're all corrupt. And even the heads of those journals, like Marcia Angell, who for 20 years was head of the New England Journal of Medicine, says that we no longer are a science journal. We are a vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.”
He’s right. These journals have become nothing more than vessels for pharmaceutical propaganda.
Dr. Marcia Angell, who served as Editor-in-Chief of The New England Journal of Medicine for over 20 years, has publicly acknowledged that her journal and others have been captured by industry. Her exact words:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
RFK Jr. also referenced Dr. Richard Horton, current editor-in-chief of The Lancet, who admitted:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
In the podcast, RFK Jr. laid out a clear plan to remedy this corruption:
NIH scientists will stop publishing in these corrupted journals unless major reform occurs.
NIH will allocate 20% of its budget to replication studies—restoring scientific integrity.
Peer review will become transparent and public.
New, independent NIH-backed journals will be launched within each health institute—becoming the new standard for legitimate science.
At the McCullough Foundation, we’ve encountered the Journal Cartel firsthand. A prime example of this is when Elsevier blatantly violated COPE guidelines by censoring our study “A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination” — shortly after successful peer review and official acceptance — likely because it demonstrated a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Our study had just become the #1 trending research paper worldwide across all subject areas before Elsevier abruptly intervened...
According to Reuters, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has canceled two major contracts worth $766 million with Moderna for its experimental mRNA H5N1 bird flu injections—terminating both late-stage development funding and any government purchase commitments.
The terminated contracts include:
$590 million awarded in January 2025 under the Biden administration for expanded late-stage clinical trials
$176 million awarded in 2024 to support early development of Moderna’s mRNA flu platform
While Moderna announced “positive interim data,” HHS pulled the plug—marking a major policy shift away from dangerous mRNA injection programs.
This is a very positive development. mRNA-based injections have repeatedly shown complete failure and cause catastrophic harm, as we’ve seen with COVID-19 and RSV.
The CDC is literally still recommending the COVID shots for everyone, including babies, children, adults and pregnant women, ‘healthy’ or otherwise.
No One Knows What This Was About
On Tuesday, Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy (RFK Jr.) announced on X that, “As of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.”
Industry was confused because literally nothing changed. It was all theatre.
HHS Did NOT Issue an Official Government Press Release
Not only, was no one from the CDC’s leadership in the press video on the alleged changes to the CDC recommendations for the COVID-19 injections, but neither HHS, nor the FDA nor the CDC issued an official press statement.
The FDA did issue a press statement on moving forward with the production of the 2025-2026 FDA-approved COVID-19 booster formulations despite major public pushback with nearly 100,000 comments being submitted to the COVID-19 Booster FDA Advisory Committee.
Medicaid Is Still Providing Reimbursement for the COVID Shots
Secretary Kennedy did not mention if the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other insurance providers would continue to cover the COVID shots for all patients. Since the FDA did not revoke the authorization for children under the age of 12 or revoke the FDA approvals, nothing has changed in regard to US residents having access to getting the shots. Doctors who are “pro-COVID shots” can still push the shots to their patients and be reimbursed.
Enough With the Theatre, Recall the Shots
We are well past the threshold for the FDA to issue a Class 1 recall for the COVID-19 injections. According to 21 CFR § 7.41, the FDA has the authority to issue a Class 1 recall when any disease or injuries have already occurred from the use of the product.
This week, Fox ran another encouraging story headlined, “HHS ends Biden-era COVID-19 testing program that bled taxpayers years after pandemic.”
No more free covid tests! "With COVID-19 behaving more like the seasonal flu — rising and falling through the year — and tests widely available at retail stores nationwide, continued federal distribution is a significant waste of taxpayers’ dollars," HHS told Fox on Tuesday.
What will covid fetishists do now? Pay for their own tests? Are you kidding me?
An Open Letter to HHS Scy Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Makary - Stop mRNA shots, deliver on your campaign promises
May 31, 2025
Dear HHS Secretary Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary,
We are writing this open letter to express deep concerns about recent policies emerging from HHS, the CDC and the FDA: specifically, the omission of the dangerous mRNA injections from the recently released “MAHA Report”; and the reaffirmation of the CDC’s recommendations for mRNA injections. Removal of the mRNA platform from the market is one of the main goals of the grassroots MAHA movement.
Millions of concerned parents set aside partisan differences and identities to embrace the historic MAGA/MAHA alliance. Instead of policy action on these key issues, we, the undersigned, along with many other citizens, see a set of distractions, linguistic misdirections, and watered-down policy announcements that avoid taking serious action on the deadly mRNA injections.
Contrary to what Dr. Makary recently stated, we do not need more data to establish whether the mRNA platform should or should not be recommended. The data are in, from many credible sources, including numerous peer reviewed publications, the analysis of the Pfizer documents released via Aaron Siri’s lawsuit, VAERS and vSAFE datasets, and data produced by foreign governments. The data show catastrophic levels of deaths and serious damage from the mRNA injections, as well as reproductive damage, including high miscarriage rates.
We do not need more studies to pull the mRNA injections from the market. You do not need Congress nor another election. You do not need a new mandate from voters – your own appointments to HHS and the FDA, and the election of President Trump in the MAGA-MAHA alliance, are the mandate.
Indeed, your recent wordplay about “removing” the mRNA injection from being recommended to “pregnant women” and “healthy children” appears misleading, vis-à-vis the actual policy changes published by the FDA and CDC. The published policies reserve the power to “recommend” them for every child except the “healthy”.
Most US children, as you, Secretary Kennedy, have pointed out yourself, have health issues, and healthcare encounters often involve a currently sick child who may be labeled “immunocompromised.” If a child has asthma or allergies, pre-diabetes or is overweight, has a damaged heart or an impaired immune system, that child is not “healthy,” yet that child will now be targeted with an mRNA shot. It appears that you are going to continue to recommend the shots that now have an FDA warning for heart damage, to children with heart damage.
The new FDA Covid shot policy claims to be evidence-based. However, no evidence was provided, and none exists to our knowledge, that supports statements that the categories of people marked as “vulnerable” by this FDA policy, would benefit from mRNA injections.
Conflating clearly established risks with automatically assumed benefit from a product that is still legally a poorly-regulated, liability-free EUA Countermeasure under PREP Act emergency declaration, defies scientific reason and common sense.
You stated the shots were removed from the CDC recommendation for pregnant women. But pregnancy remains listed as a “high risk” health category in the revised FDA policy for mRNA vaccines. It is especially troubling that the new versions of mRNA injections are recommended for all pregnant women, without this platform ever having been tested and proven safe in pregnancy. Pregnant women have not been made any safer by your wordplay.
Lastly, there is evidence of the removal of parental rights to choose the health treatment for their children, buried in CDC’s language. Even for healthy children, the CDC insists on parents “sharing the decision” with healthcare providers, including pharmacists who lack authority to treat patients. By stating the decision to inject a child with mRNA is a “shared decision”, while “routine” injections are treated as the “default decision to inject”, a dangerous legal precedent is being set, assigning powers to the Federal government that have legally belonged only to parents.
We object strongly to any more equivocation and prevarication from HHS. We did not fight for you to be in positions of leadership, so that our clearly stated policy goals would suffer a “bait and switch” that rebrands MAHA’s powerful objection to the damaging mRNA platform as a concern about the coloring agents added to Skittles.
MAHA is not the possession of Secretary Kennedy, Commissioner Marty Makary, advisor Calley Means, or Surgeon General nominee Dr. Casey Means. MAHA is the voice of millions of desperate parents, many with injured or deceased children. Those furious parents were active before any of you were in office, and their activism will outlast any administration.
The MAHA vote, especially of independent moms, is an historic game-changer. Neither MAGA nor the Democrats could have won without this critical swing vote.
MAHA voters can walk away if we continue to see inaction, let alone condescending non-policy, on our core issues.
And we will.
If you continue to ignore the centerpiece of our policy agenda – taking all mRNA products covered by PREP Act emergency declarations entirely off the market – you will pay a political price. We will run our own candidates at the state level; and we will find other challengers and sponsors, who share our values and get behind our draft bills, at the Federal level, for the midterms and even for 2028. We ask you to deliver our actual policy goals in the near term, or we advise that you will face the electoral consequences:
Ban mRNA/gene therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines, due to definitively
demonstrated abject failure regarding safety, efficacy and disease prevention in the real-world setting of over 4 years of deployment and billions of administered doses.
Terminate the PREP Act declaration for COVID injections, as there is no emergency. Extension of this declaration, with its ironclad liability shield for manufacturers and administrators, serves no public health interest whatsoever.
Recommend that Congress repeal the PREP Act entirely, due to numerous Constitutional conflicts.
Ban pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising, as is the case in every other country except New Zealand.
Review and revise current HHS level policies that create perverse incentives for
healthcare providers for medical coercion, including but not limited to vaccinations.
End conflicts of interest at CDC, FDA, NIH and NIAID.
Sincerely,
Not For Sale co-signatories:
Mary Talley Bowden MD, Americans for Health Freedom
Dr Naomi Wolf, The Pfizer Papers
Shannon Joy, The Shannon Joy Show
Sasha Latypova, Due Diligence and Art
Debbie Lerman
Dr. Henry Ealy, Energetic Health Institute
Brad Skistimas, Five Times August
Toby Rogers
Catherine Austin Fitts, The Solari Report
Allen and Taylor Martin, in memory of Trista Martin
Thomas Haviland, 2022, 2023, and 2024 "Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Surveys"
https://www.notforsalesignatures.com/ - Site under construction
Contact: NotForSaleRelease@gmail.com
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just announced the removal of all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—the panel tasked with recommending vaccines for the American public—citing longstanding corruption, persistent conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and a documented history of rubber-stamping vaccines without adequate scrutiny.
The full statement from Secretary Kennedy, published in The Wall Street Journal, is below:
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics, but there is one thing all parties can agree on: The U.S. faces a crisis of public trust. Whether toward health agencies, pharmaceutical companies or vaccines themselves, public confidence is waning.
Some would try to explain this away by blaming misinformation or antiscience attitudes. To do so, however, ignores a history of conflicts of interest, persecution of dissidents, a lack of curiosity, and skewed science that has plagued the vaccine regulatory apparatus for decades.
That is why, under my direction, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is putting the restoration of public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda. The public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies. This will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible.
Today, we are taking a bold step in restoring public trust by totally reconstituting the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP). We are retiring the 17 current members of the committee, some of whom were last-minute appointees of the Biden administration. Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028.
ACIP evaluates the safety, efficacy and clinical need of the nation’s vaccines and passes its findings on to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine. It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons. It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women. To make matters worse, the groups that inform ACIP meet behind closed doors, violating the legal and ethical principle of transparency crucial to maintaining public trust.
In 2000 the House issued the results of an investigation of ACIP and another vaccine advisory committee under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration—the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. It found that enforcement of its conflict-of-interest rules was weak to nonexistent. Committee members regularly participated in deliberations and advocated products in which they had a financial stake. The CDC issued conflict-of-interest waivers to every committee member. Four out of eight ACIP members who voted in 1997 on guidelines for the Rotashield vaccine, subsequently withdrawn because of severe adverse events, had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies developing other rotavirus vaccines. A 2009 HHS inspector-general report echoed these findings. Few committee members completed full conflict-of-interest forms—97% of them had omissions. The CDC took no significant action to remedy the omissions.
These conflicts of interest persist. Most of ACIP’s members have received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, including those marketing vaccines. The problem isn’t necessarily that ACIP members are corrupt. Most likely aim to serve the public interest as they understand it. The problem is their immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy. The new members won’t directly work for the vaccine industry. They will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry—unafraid to ask hard questions.
A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science. In the 1960s, the world sought guidance from America’s health regulators, who had a reputation for integrity, scientific impartiality and zealous defense of patient welfare. Public trust has since collapsed, but we will earn it back.
It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.
That disgraceful finding —twenty-five years ago!— came after the disastrous Rotashield vaccine scandal. That jab had been roundly blessed by ACIP, but had to quickly be withdrawn from the market due to severe adverse events. The House Report found that half of the Committee members who voted for Rotashield’s approval “had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies developing other rotavirus vaccines.”
The CDC knew about the members’ conflicts of interest, but just issued a global conflict waiver to the entire committee. And, Bob’s your uncle, just like all the covid shot blessings, Rotashield was approved anyway.
This may shock you, but not everyone was pleased. Dr. Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association, who doesn’t know his stethoscope from a garden hose, whined that the mass firing "upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives." Okay, doc.
Dr. Scott didn’t bother explaining how blanket conflict-of-interest waivers constitute transparency.
Gone, but still NOT PUNISHED.
NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week.
They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and became a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns, and a professor of operations management. ...
The new appointees include Vicky Pebsworth, a regional director for the National Association of Catholic Nurses, who has been listed as a board member and volunteer director for the National Vaccine Information Center...
Another is Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. ...
Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. ...
Dr. James Hibbeln, who formerly headed a National Institutes of Health group focused on nutritional neurosciences and who studies how nutrition affects the brain, including the potential benefits of seafood consumption during pregnancy.
Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies business issues related to supply chain, logistics, pricing optimization and health and health care management. In a 2023 video pinned to an X profile under his name, Levi called for the end of the COVID-19 vaccination program, claiming the vaccines were ineffective and dangerous...
Dr. James Pagano, an emergency medicine physician from Los Angeles.
Dr. Michael Ross, a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist.
Not sure I trust Malone, but all the others sound pretty good to me.
I’ll tell you where the Times has been for the last 20 years of ACIP ethical conflict. They’ve been in the back room, counting their pharma advertising money, that’s where.
Nobody cares what the Times thinks. It needs to sit down and shut up. Science!
If you’ve ever felt conflicted over Malone’s appointment to the vaccine committee, perhaps consider who his enemies are. A dark thread in the conservative influencer community has been savaging Malone for his early vaccine advocacy, which immediately changed after he personally was injured by the jabs. He told me the story himself at a speaker dinner in 2021.
Hilariously, Malone has been promptly posting about what’s happening since he was appointed to ACIP. The first thing he got after the news broke was an ‘offer’ to ‘consult’ for pharma for $450 an hour:
In other words, first they tried to create a conflict of interest. When that didn’t work, well, it was time for “Plan B.” Roll out the New York Times ‘investigators,’ who couldn’t find their bruised bottom if it were strapped into a dog collar and leashed.
It’s not just the Times. They’ve all let slip the dogs of cancel culture war. Yesterday, Malone reported the Atlantic is also writing a character assassination story, this one about his misinformation superspreading ways...
Recently, Secretary Kennedy made some changes to the voting membership of CDC’s vaccine committee. However, the voting members are surrounded by 36 non-voting members who all shill for industry interests at the expense of vaccine safety.
A next step toward bringing just a bit of balance would be to add the following groups to the list of non-voting members:
• Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
• Medical Academy of Pediatrics & Special Needs (MAPS)
• Physicians for Informed Consent
• Children’s Health Defense
• Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
The Secretary of HHS already has this authority directly under ACIP’s charter, as it allows for “such other non-voting liaison representatives as the Secretary deems necessary.”
This small change would bring us a bit closer toward making CDC a place that works for people and not pharma interests when it comes to vaccines.
« First « Previous Comments 51 - 90 of 91 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelation-notices-saturday-february