« First « Previous Comments 73 - 100 of 100 Search these comments
According to Reuters, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has canceled two major contracts worth $766 million with Moderna for its experimental mRNA H5N1 bird flu injections—terminating both late-stage development funding and any government purchase commitments.
The terminated contracts include:
$590 million awarded in January 2025 under the Biden administration for expanded late-stage clinical trials
$176 million awarded in 2024 to support early development of Moderna’s mRNA flu platform
While Moderna announced “positive interim data,” HHS pulled the plug—marking a major policy shift away from dangerous mRNA injection programs.
This is a very positive development. mRNA-based injections have repeatedly shown complete failure and cause catastrophic harm, as we’ve seen with COVID-19 and RSV.
The CDC is literally still recommending the COVID shots for everyone, including babies, children, adults and pregnant women, ‘healthy’ or otherwise.
No One Knows What This Was About
On Tuesday, Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy (RFK Jr.) announced on X that, “As of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.”
Industry was confused because literally nothing changed. It was all theatre.
HHS Did NOT Issue an Official Government Press Release
Not only, was no one from the CDC’s leadership in the press video on the alleged changes to the CDC recommendations for the COVID-19 injections, but neither HHS, nor the FDA nor the CDC issued an official press statement.
The FDA did issue a press statement on moving forward with the production of the 2025-2026 FDA-approved COVID-19 booster formulations despite major public pushback with nearly 100,000 comments being submitted to the COVID-19 Booster FDA Advisory Committee.
Medicaid Is Still Providing Reimbursement for the COVID Shots
Secretary Kennedy did not mention if the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other insurance providers would continue to cover the COVID shots for all patients. Since the FDA did not revoke the authorization for children under the age of 12 or revoke the FDA approvals, nothing has changed in regard to US residents having access to getting the shots. Doctors who are “pro-COVID shots” can still push the shots to their patients and be reimbursed.
Enough With the Theatre, Recall the Shots
We are well past the threshold for the FDA to issue a Class 1 recall for the COVID-19 injections. According to 21 CFR § 7.41, the FDA has the authority to issue a Class 1 recall when any disease or injuries have already occurred from the use of the product.
This week, Fox ran another encouraging story headlined, “HHS ends Biden-era COVID-19 testing program that bled taxpayers years after pandemic.”
No more free covid tests! "With COVID-19 behaving more like the seasonal flu — rising and falling through the year — and tests widely available at retail stores nationwide, continued federal distribution is a significant waste of taxpayers’ dollars," HHS told Fox on Tuesday.
What will covid fetishists do now? Pay for their own tests? Are you kidding me?
An Open Letter to HHS Scy Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Makary - Stop mRNA shots, deliver on your campaign promises
May 31, 2025
Dear HHS Secretary Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary,
We are writing this open letter to express deep concerns about recent policies emerging from HHS, the CDC and the FDA: specifically, the omission of the dangerous mRNA injections from the recently released “MAHA Report”; and the reaffirmation of the CDC’s recommendations for mRNA injections. Removal of the mRNA platform from the market is one of the main goals of the grassroots MAHA movement.
Millions of concerned parents set aside partisan differences and identities to embrace the historic MAGA/MAHA alliance. Instead of policy action on these key issues, we, the undersigned, along with many other citizens, see a set of distractions, linguistic misdirections, and watered-down policy announcements that avoid taking serious action on the deadly mRNA injections.
Contrary to what Dr. Makary recently stated, we do not need more data to establish whether the mRNA platform should or should not be recommended. The data are in, from many credible sources, including numerous peer reviewed publications, the analysis of the Pfizer documents released via Aaron Siri’s lawsuit, VAERS and vSAFE datasets, and data produced by foreign governments. The data show catastrophic levels of deaths and serious damage from the mRNA injections, as well as reproductive damage, including high miscarriage rates.
We do not need more studies to pull the mRNA injections from the market. You do not need Congress nor another election. You do not need a new mandate from voters – your own appointments to HHS and the FDA, and the election of President Trump in the MAGA-MAHA alliance, are the mandate.
Indeed, your recent wordplay about “removing” the mRNA injection from being recommended to “pregnant women” and “healthy children” appears misleading, vis-à-vis the actual policy changes published by the FDA and CDC. The published policies reserve the power to “recommend” them for every child except the “healthy”.
Most US children, as you, Secretary Kennedy, have pointed out yourself, have health issues, and healthcare encounters often involve a currently sick child who may be labeled “immunocompromised.” If a child has asthma or allergies, pre-diabetes or is overweight, has a damaged heart or an impaired immune system, that child is not “healthy,” yet that child will now be targeted with an mRNA shot. It appears that you are going to continue to recommend the shots that now have an FDA warning for heart damage, to children with heart damage.
The new FDA Covid shot policy claims to be evidence-based. However, no evidence was provided, and none exists to our knowledge, that supports statements that the categories of people marked as “vulnerable” by this FDA policy, would benefit from mRNA injections.
Conflating clearly established risks with automatically assumed benefit from a product that is still legally a poorly-regulated, liability-free EUA Countermeasure under PREP Act emergency declaration, defies scientific reason and common sense.
You stated the shots were removed from the CDC recommendation for pregnant women. But pregnancy remains listed as a “high risk” health category in the revised FDA policy for mRNA vaccines. It is especially troubling that the new versions of mRNA injections are recommended for all pregnant women, without this platform ever having been tested and proven safe in pregnancy. Pregnant women have not been made any safer by your wordplay.
Lastly, there is evidence of the removal of parental rights to choose the health treatment for their children, buried in CDC’s language. Even for healthy children, the CDC insists on parents “sharing the decision” with healthcare providers, including pharmacists who lack authority to treat patients. By stating the decision to inject a child with mRNA is a “shared decision”, while “routine” injections are treated as the “default decision to inject”, a dangerous legal precedent is being set, assigning powers to the Federal government that have legally belonged only to parents.
We object strongly to any more equivocation and prevarication from HHS. We did not fight for you to be in positions of leadership, so that our clearly stated policy goals would suffer a “bait and switch” that rebrands MAHA’s powerful objection to the damaging mRNA platform as a concern about the coloring agents added to Skittles.
MAHA is not the possession of Secretary Kennedy, Commissioner Marty Makary, advisor Calley Means, or Surgeon General nominee Dr. Casey Means. MAHA is the voice of millions of desperate parents, many with injured or deceased children. Those furious parents were active before any of you were in office, and their activism will outlast any administration.
The MAHA vote, especially of independent moms, is an historic game-changer. Neither MAGA nor the Democrats could have won without this critical swing vote.
MAHA voters can walk away if we continue to see inaction, let alone condescending non-policy, on our core issues.
And we will.
If you continue to ignore the centerpiece of our policy agenda – taking all mRNA products covered by PREP Act emergency declarations entirely off the market – you will pay a political price. We will run our own candidates at the state level; and we will find other challengers and sponsors, who share our values and get behind our draft bills, at the Federal level, for the midterms and even for 2028. We ask you to deliver our actual policy goals in the near term, or we advise that you will face the electoral consequences:
Ban mRNA/gene therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines, due to definitively
demonstrated abject failure regarding safety, efficacy and disease prevention in the real-world setting of over 4 years of deployment and billions of administered doses.
Terminate the PREP Act declaration for COVID injections, as there is no emergency. Extension of this declaration, with its ironclad liability shield for manufacturers and administrators, serves no public health interest whatsoever.
Recommend that Congress repeal the PREP Act entirely, due to numerous Constitutional conflicts.
Ban pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising, as is the case in every other country except New Zealand.
Review and revise current HHS level policies that create perverse incentives for
healthcare providers for medical coercion, including but not limited to vaccinations.
End conflicts of interest at CDC, FDA, NIH and NIAID.
Sincerely,
Not For Sale co-signatories:
Mary Talley Bowden MD, Americans for Health Freedom
Dr Naomi Wolf, The Pfizer Papers
Shannon Joy, The Shannon Joy Show
Sasha Latypova, Due Diligence and Art
Debbie Lerman
Dr. Henry Ealy, Energetic Health Institute
Brad Skistimas, Five Times August
Toby Rogers
Catherine Austin Fitts, The Solari Report
Allen and Taylor Martin, in memory of Trista Martin
Thomas Haviland, 2022, 2023, and 2024 "Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Surveys"
https://www.notforsalesignatures.com/ - Site under construction
Contact: NotForSaleRelease@gmail.com
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just announced the removal of all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—the panel tasked with recommending vaccines for the American public—citing longstanding corruption, persistent conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and a documented history of rubber-stamping vaccines without adequate scrutiny.
The full statement from Secretary Kennedy, published in The Wall Street Journal, is below:
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics, but there is one thing all parties can agree on: The U.S. faces a crisis of public trust. Whether toward health agencies, pharmaceutical companies or vaccines themselves, public confidence is waning.
Some would try to explain this away by blaming misinformation or antiscience attitudes. To do so, however, ignores a history of conflicts of interest, persecution of dissidents, a lack of curiosity, and skewed science that has plagued the vaccine regulatory apparatus for decades.
That is why, under my direction, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is putting the restoration of public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda. The public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies. This will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible.
Today, we are taking a bold step in restoring public trust by totally reconstituting the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP). We are retiring the 17 current members of the committee, some of whom were last-minute appointees of the Biden administration. Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028.
ACIP evaluates the safety, efficacy and clinical need of the nation’s vaccines and passes its findings on to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine. It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons. It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women. To make matters worse, the groups that inform ACIP meet behind closed doors, violating the legal and ethical principle of transparency crucial to maintaining public trust.
In 2000 the House issued the results of an investigation of ACIP and another vaccine advisory committee under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration—the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. It found that enforcement of its conflict-of-interest rules was weak to nonexistent. Committee members regularly participated in deliberations and advocated products in which they had a financial stake. The CDC issued conflict-of-interest waivers to every committee member. Four out of eight ACIP members who voted in 1997 on guidelines for the Rotashield vaccine, subsequently withdrawn because of severe adverse events, had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies developing other rotavirus vaccines. A 2009 HHS inspector-general report echoed these findings. Few committee members completed full conflict-of-interest forms—97% of them had omissions. The CDC took no significant action to remedy the omissions.
These conflicts of interest persist. Most of ACIP’s members have received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, including those marketing vaccines. The problem isn’t necessarily that ACIP members are corrupt. Most likely aim to serve the public interest as they understand it. The problem is their immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy. The new members won’t directly work for the vaccine industry. They will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry—unafraid to ask hard questions.
A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science. In the 1960s, the world sought guidance from America’s health regulators, who had a reputation for integrity, scientific impartiality and zealous defense of patient welfare. Public trust has since collapsed, but we will earn it back.
It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.
That disgraceful finding —twenty-five years ago!— came after the disastrous Rotashield vaccine scandal. That jab had been roundly blessed by ACIP, but had to quickly be withdrawn from the market due to severe adverse events. The House Report found that half of the Committee members who voted for Rotashield’s approval “had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies developing other rotavirus vaccines.”
The CDC knew about the members’ conflicts of interest, but just issued a global conflict waiver to the entire committee. And, Bob’s your uncle, just like all the covid shot blessings, Rotashield was approved anyway.
This may shock you, but not everyone was pleased. Dr. Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association, who doesn’t know his stethoscope from a garden hose, whined that the mass firing "upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives." Okay, doc.
Dr. Scott didn’t bother explaining how blanket conflict-of-interest waivers constitute transparency.
Gone, but still NOT PUNISHED.
NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week.
They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and became a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns, and a professor of operations management. ...
The new appointees include Vicky Pebsworth, a regional director for the National Association of Catholic Nurses, who has been listed as a board member and volunteer director for the National Vaccine Information Center...
Another is Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. ...
Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. ...
Dr. James Hibbeln, who formerly headed a National Institutes of Health group focused on nutritional neurosciences and who studies how nutrition affects the brain, including the potential benefits of seafood consumption during pregnancy.
Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies business issues related to supply chain, logistics, pricing optimization and health and health care management. In a 2023 video pinned to an X profile under his name, Levi called for the end of the COVID-19 vaccination program, claiming the vaccines were ineffective and dangerous...
Dr. James Pagano, an emergency medicine physician from Los Angeles.
Dr. Michael Ross, a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist.
Not sure I trust Malone, but all the others sound pretty good to me.
I’ll tell you where the Times has been for the last 20 years of ACIP ethical conflict. They’ve been in the back room, counting their pharma advertising money, that’s where.
Nobody cares what the Times thinks. It needs to sit down and shut up. Science!
If you’ve ever felt conflicted over Malone’s appointment to the vaccine committee, perhaps consider who his enemies are. A dark thread in the conservative influencer community has been savaging Malone for his early vaccine advocacy, which immediately changed after he personally was injured by the jabs. He told me the story himself at a speaker dinner in 2021.
Hilariously, Malone has been promptly posting about what’s happening since he was appointed to ACIP. The first thing he got after the news broke was an ‘offer’ to ‘consult’ for pharma for $450 an hour:
In other words, first they tried to create a conflict of interest. When that didn’t work, well, it was time for “Plan B.” Roll out the New York Times ‘investigators,’ who couldn’t find their bruised bottom if it were strapped into a dog collar and leashed.
It’s not just the Times. They’ve all let slip the dogs of cancel culture war. Yesterday, Malone reported the Atlantic is also writing a character assassination story, this one about his misinformation superspreading ways...
Recently, Secretary Kennedy made some changes to the voting membership of CDC’s vaccine committee. However, the voting members are surrounded by 36 non-voting members who all shill for industry interests at the expense of vaccine safety.
A next step toward bringing just a bit of balance would be to add the following groups to the list of non-voting members:
• Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
• Medical Academy of Pediatrics & Special Needs (MAPS)
• Physicians for Informed Consent
• Children’s Health Defense
• Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
The Secretary of HHS already has this authority directly under ACIP’s charter, as it allows for “such other non-voting liaison representatives as the Secretary deems necessary.”
This small change would bring us a bit closer toward making CDC a place that works for people and not pharma interests when it comes to vaccines.
Something is happening this week in MAHA history. Something big. Kennedy, criticized by hopeful MAHAnians yearning for the whole thing to be torn down right now, took a few months to get his running gears oiled and spinning smoothly. I may be misreading the political entrails, but I’m starting to think the thimerosal essay Kennedy tweeted yesterday (with footnotes!) was a formal declaration of war.
Today’s news was that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s new ACIP vaccine committee —flushed and reconstituted within the last two weeks in a surprise coup— met yesterday in public for the first time. It was everything you’d have hoped it would be. ...
Martin Kulldorff, former professor of medicine at Harvard University and the committee’s new chair, sounded the battle trumpet by immediately inviting people to share any and all criticisms of vaccines, and torched the media for “fanning the flames of vaccine hesitancy” with lazy “anti-vaxxer” labels for the new panelists. Dr. Robert Malone, the panel’s vaccine-injured co-chair, said he considers the label “anti-vaxxer” to be “high praise.” Kulldorff reminded everyone he’d been fired from Harvard for refusing to get a covid shot because he already had natural immunity.
Dr. Kulldorf then announced the panel will soon review the entire childhood vaccine schedule, all 72 shots, not just individually, but also for their combined effects: “In addition to studying and evaluating individual vaccines, it’s important to evaluate the cumulative effect of a recommended vaccine schedule,” he said. ...
The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively rage-quit, boycotting the meeting —its first absence in decades— sneering that, “we won’t lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health.” Okay (cough, school closures, cough). Other attending organizations, like the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, whined about their new inability to unmute their microphones without being called on.
What followed was a glorious fusillade of hard questions. The panelists probed representatives from various agencies and industry groups with unanswerable queries that echoed through the conference room’s hallowed walls. The CDC’s representatives were tense and even shell-shocked, apparently unprepared by their prior professional careers for responding to any skeptical inquiry.
Dr. Robert Malone immediately proved his value, speaking soberly in deep scientific terms, invoking volumes of vaccine terminology, and citing research studies by name, on topics like spike protein persistence, adverse-event clusters, and lot-to-lot variability:
https://x.com/Humanspective/status/1937985251936244225
The new committee members didn’t vote on anything yesterday. They just asked questions and listened carefully. The meeting continues today, and a public agenda disclosed plans to vote on thimerosal in flu vaccines next week (hence Kennedy’s missive). I can’t wait.
Let us not pass too quickly by this astonishing historical moment. This is the first time in U.S. history that the federal vaccine committee threw anything but weak softballs or theatrical skepticism. The war has begun. It’s a new, more health-focused day in Washington, and Trump’s HHS has emerged from the shadows of controversy and marched onto the battlefield.
In other words, Kennedy just burned the ships. It’s on. There’s no way out but through.
But wait, there was more. A lot more. Yesterday, the Washington Post ran a related story headlined, “RFK Jr. says U.S. will stop funding global vaccine alliance Gavi.” “Until Gavi considers the best science available,” Kennedy said, “the United States won’t contribute more.” Cue the media meltdown.
Gavi — full name Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance — is one of those shadowy-sounding, feel-good global “public-private partnership” NGOs that always seem to involve Bill Gates, the World Health Organization, and a firehose of taxpayer money. Founded in 2000, Gavi claims to be saving the world by buying vaccines in bulk and shipping them off to poor countries — mostly for kids. It acts as a kind of middleman: donors give money (like the U.S., the U.K., and Gates), pharmaceutical companies supply vaccines, and Gavi makes sure shots get delivered — whether the locals want them or not.
Gavi claims it’s about access and equity. In reality, it’s about funneling billions through a slick international bureaucracy with zero voter oversight, ironclad PR, and very cozy ties to vaccine makers. It’s like the UN met Big Pharma in a dark Davos bathhouse. Until now, the U.S. kicked in 12% of Gavi’s total funding — billions over the years — with almost nothing to show for it in terms of transparency, safety audits, or public debate.
The Washington Post framed it as a moral catastrophe. It quoted a gallery of aghast public health mandarins declaring that “children will die” and “RFK Jr. will be personally responsible.” They trotted out Atul Gawande to call the move a “travesty” and a “nightmare.” Gates himself crawled out into the light of social media to lament “devastating consequences,” warning of “more sick kids,” “overcrowded hospitals,” and “grieving parents.”
Kennedy praised Gavi for trying to help poor folks, but then promptly accused Gavi of brushing off safety concerns and, in his best line, explained, “When vaccine safety issues have come before Gavi, Gavi has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.” He cited a gold-standard study linking the DTP shot to increased childhood mortality — a topic corporate media won’t touch with a ten-foot hypodermic — and accused the “alliance” of ignoring inconvenient science.
None of WaPo’s hysterical experts bothered to cite any evidence that Gavi spends a single dollar on mitigating vaccine injuries or even troubling itself to track them. No quotes about surveillance systems. No mention of adverse event compensation. No data on injury rates.
Just emotion. Wild, hysterical emotion. ...
Gavi isn’t just about shots. It’s about control, narrative harmonization, and greasing the gears of global progressive power. Kennedy’s sudden cash withdrawal might jam more types of gears than the media is willing to openly admit: hence the hysteria. ...
We can finally begin to ask a thorny question no one has ever been able to satisfactorily answer: Is this what “draining the swamp” actually looks like in real life?
Not as a slogan or a rally chant. But as a methodical, piece-by-piece dismantling of the whole damnable machinery — the invisible gears of elite global influence, Marxist regulatory capture, and leftwing ideological graft.
First, USAID got scalped. Then NGOs were put on a starvation diet. Then came the DEI bloodletting. Then, the NIH closed the spigot for transgender rodent grants. Harvard’s gravy train went into the culvert. Big Pharma is suddenly playing defense in every direction. NATO’s finances are being strained to the limits of what Europe can bear, evaporating the dark budgets that once sloshed freely through the Swiss Alps. ActBlue investigations. DNC checks bouncing.
And now Gavi —the crown jewel of global health virtue signaling— just had its funding rug (a delightful 4000-thread-count Turkish classic) yanked right out from under it.
Piece by piece, dollar by dollar, what we’re witnessing is not chaos. Please. It’s not even payback. It’s a plan. We can now see the deliberate logic that was hiding behind the frantic scramble. It’s a strategic, rapid-fire offensive —carefully calibrated and coldly executed (cue Nessum Dorma)— aimed at dismantling the entire unaccountable infrastructure of elite global control.
The American Academy of Pediatrics pre-emptively rage-quit, boycotting the meeting —its first absence in decades— sneering that, “we won’t lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children’s health.” Okay (cough, school closures, cough). Other attending organizations, like the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, whined about their new inability to unmute their microphones without being called on.
Considering all the mRNA "vaccines" coming down the pipeline, it's probably necessary to have one expert in this field on the panel. That being said, Malone could be the Trojan Horse.
COVID-19 Vaccine Labels Updated With Expanded Warnings About Risk of Heart Inflammation
The Food and Drug Administration directed manufacturers to update the labels.
Federal regulators on June 25 updated labels for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines to expand warnings regarding heart inflammation.
The updated labels state that myocarditis, inflammation, and a related condition called pericarditis have occurred following receipt of one of the shots “most commonly in males 12 years through 24 years of age.”
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
@BusyDrT
Under RFK Jr.’s MAHA direction, the new ACIP just removed the universal flu shot recommendation — and voted against thimerosal-containing vaccines.
No press release. No spotlight. Just a quiet reversal after decades of pushing mercury-laced shots on the masses.
The science didn’t change. The politics did.
This is what happens when truth gets a seat at the table.
In a stunning about-face, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to issue a warning that Covid mRNA “vaccines” come with a real, measurable, and potentially long-term risk of heart damage, especially in young men and teenage males.
The FDA is only now acknowledging what critics have warned about for years.
Newly appointed FDA Commissioner Dr. Vinay Prasad issued a class-wide safety label update for all Covid mRNA injections.
The federal agency is finally admitting to the elevated risk of myocarditis and related cardiac injury among those who received the shots.
However, while the warning may be new, the data isn’t.
The FDA has had access to this information for years but chose to remain silent.
As Slay News has previously reported, Myocarditis is a “silent killer” at the center of the sudden deaths crisis that emerged after the Covid injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021. ...
However, this move, while necessary, feels more like damage control than genuine reform.
A label update is a belated admission of failure.
The agency admits it suppressed early safety signals, some under political pressure.
Yet there is still no reckoning.
There are still no hearings, prosecutions, or apologies.
You just cannot make this madness up. It is incredible that the greatest public health disasters OWS lockdowns and Malone mRNA vaccine are being covered up and presented as ‘saving lives’. And life goes on. And RFK Jr. has not removed the mRNA vaccines from market and I today will say never will. We have been fed a 6 for a 9 and IMO, all those in the health agencies now, some good people, are there ONLY to block for RFK Jr. and make you think change and fix is coming. Further from the truth. There are there to continue status quo and even expand mRNA to you all. It is all a game, like during COVID. All a lie and con. Word games. The public remains the loser.
The moment not one word was mentioned at POTUS Trump’s RNC convention of COVID or lockdowns or mRNA vaccine, the moment Ms. Wiles was made CoS, you knew the game. The con. The moment RFK Jr. advised he was endorsing Trump and then went silent on OWS lockdowns and COVID and mRNA vaccine, we knew something was up. It is all playing out now. The moment DNC and Biden also did not address COVID and the Malone deadly mRNA vaccine, in their DNC convention, you knew the fix was in.
« First « Previous Comments 73 - 100 of 100 Search these comments
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelation-notices-saturday-february