3
0

Trump SOTU Tomorrow: Announces US to leave NATO?


               
2025 Mar 3, 3:36pm   587 views  33 comments

by MolotovCocktail   follow (4)  




If he does, that would be MAGAwesome!

Comments 1 - 33 of 33        Search these comments

1   Eric Holder   2025 Mar 3, 5:06pm  

Poor Orban. 😭 Being left one-on-one with very well armed Nazis whom he's been pissing off for the last 10 years is no picnic. 😱

On the bright side the fat fuck is good for at least 5 lampshades. 🤣
2   steverbeaver   2025 Mar 3, 6:51pm  

Nah. I predict more overt asslicking and creampuffing for Israel than has ever been done in the history of man, yet a sizeable portion of zoomers and alphas still won't get the message.
3   Eric Holder   2025 Mar 3, 7:26pm  

Eric Holder says

Poor Orban. 😭 Being left one-on-one with very well armed Nazis whom he's been pissing off for the last 10 years is no picnic. 😱

On the bright side the fat fuck is good for at least 5 lampshades. 🤣


Looks like the fat pedo fuck is reading the forum. There is no other explanation to the sole dislike. 🤣
4   Patrick   2025 Mar 3, 7:34pm  

I like Orban and agree with everything he says. His interview with Tucker was pretty good.
5   RWSGFY   2025 Mar 3, 9:29pm  

Patrick says


I like Orban


Too bad: he's gonna be thrown under the Nazi bus once NATO is no more. His country is land-locked, small and with population conditioned to not resist invasions. Zel will wear his skin as a cape and drink schnapps from his skull.

"It's a bad neighborhood".
6   Onvacation   2025 Mar 3, 9:35pm  

NATO should be dissolved. We won.

Kicked the Warsaw pacts ass.
7   MolotovCocktail   2025 Mar 3, 9:55pm  

Onvacation says

NATO should be dissolved. We won.

Kicked the Warsaw pacts ass.


Yeah..THIRTY FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO.

We should have shut it down before 2000.
8   Onvacation   2025 Mar 4, 9:10am  

ALL of the former Warsaw pact nations, except the USSR which dissolved in 1989, are now members of NATO.

Is Russia paranoid?

Those that forget their history are condemned to repeat ir.
10   zzyzzx   2025 Mar 4, 9:54am  

Even if we really did promise the Soviet Union that we would not expand NATO, the Soviet Union no longer exists.
11   Reality   2025 Mar 4, 10:18am  

The sheep don't understand that the dogs and the rancher are working together. Ever since the British Pound was transformed into a fake gold-receipt standard in the 18th century (allowing the issuance of far more receipts than there is real gold in the warehouse, thereby blowing huge bubbles) resulting decades later its first secular crisis requiring instigating French Revolution to eliminate account holders en masse, Russia has proven itself to be a good board wiping tool with little to no real territorial ambition in the European human farming ground. The Russian army was in Paris in the early 19th century, and again in Berlin by 1945, yet they went back to their steppes afterwards each time on their own like the nomads in pre-modern history after cleaning the board in the farming zone, taking out bank account holders on both the Right and the Left in Europe, removing liabilities for the institutions. The British politicians with an army that has more horses than tanks today (and the other European armies in even worse shape) are doing little more than setting the table up for slaughtering the sheep in those "modern welfare states."

That board-wiping tool role may well explain why, when Yeltsin and Putin repeatedly expressed desire to join the NATO, the Deep-State controlled "western leaders" sniggered at the idea. NATO was set up to disarm Europe, and making Europeans easier to harvest.
13   Patrick   2025 Mar 4, 11:13am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/far-away-tuesday-march-4-2025-c-and


The Associated Press ran the story, headlined “Why Trump's joint remarks to Congress won't be a 'State of the Union' address.” Nor will wine-soaked Nancy Pelosi be anywhere near a copy of the speech she can drunkenly rip up.

The President’s first address to the joint Congress starts at 9pm EST. It is not called a State of the Union, as most first-year addresses aren’t, but a “Joint Address to Congress.”

There is reason to think it won’t be any ordinary kind of joint address. First of all, the President mysteriously teased in all caps yesterday that it will be a "big” night and he will “tell it like it is.” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told Fox News over the weekend people can “expect fireworks.”

A White House official told reporters that the address’s theme will be the "Renewal of the American Dream.” According to the anonymous preview, Trump will “focus on his record thus far, the economy, border security, and what the official called the President's plans for ‘peace around the globe.’”

White House spokeslady Karoline Leavitt promised it “will be MUST-SEE TV.”

Social media is abuzz with speculation about the auspicious date, March 4th, mainly because it was the original Constitutional date for the Inauguration, later moved up to January 20th by federal statute in 1933. The very first Congress met on March 4th in 1788. It’s also the date when 28 other presidents have made similar addresses.

There is a sense that Trump picked the date on purpose for its historic significance. ...

I wouldn’t dare offer any predictions. Everything Trump has done since he took office has defied predictions or even reasonable expectations. It has also been meticulously planned out.

What I expect for tonight’s address is the unexpected. Stay tuned.
14   Ceffer   2025 Mar 4, 11:32am  

Reality says


That board-wiping tool role may well explain why, when Yeltsin and Putin repeatedly expressed desire to join the NATO, the Deep-State controlled "western leaders" sniggered at the idea. NATO was set up to disarm Europe, and making Europeans easier to harvest.

Yes it's harvest time and flesh tithing and scything required by the tunnel reptoids again. Look at that Euro leadership. Macron voted out twice, and yet, there he still is. You have Monarch DPD's, Baphomets, Illuminati witches, child catamites elevated as installations with tranny handlers, Rothschild Hitler hybrids, coneheads, and mere depraved Royals, Druids, human sacrificers, Vatican Jesuit shills and pedophiles. You are looking at the animated, knotted scum of Hell on earth over there, protecting international criminal enterprises.

The monsters snigger, giggle and laugh at Trump as if he doesn't know their score.

The long established astrologic banking cycles of seed and harvest are at the blood 12 o'clock and cannot be stayed because they have already been delayed too long for the appetites of the demons.

They need to be finally and righteously amputated from our country. Whether they poke and prod Russia to perform the Zardoz task for the Phoenix resurrecting bloodlines is up to them.
15   Ceffer   2025 Mar 4, 12:21pm  

Boy, it would be such a relief if Trump pulled out of NATO and that whole sniggering demon-plex known as Europe.
16   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Mar 4, 12:35pm  

Please Please Please

"But what IF this and what IF that?"

Psst, you don't need a formal Alliance to help from a distance OR enter a war.
17   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Mar 4, 12:35pm  

steverbeaver says

Nah. I predict more overt asslicking and creampuffing for Israel than has ever been done in the history of man, yet a sizeable portion of zoomers and alphas still won't get the message.

I predict more whinging about Israel, which is not in NATO and why it was brought up in this context is a mystery.
18   Ceffer   2025 Mar 4, 11:28pm  

Well shiver my gently nudged timelines.



19   Ceffer   2025 Mar 4, 11:42pm  

Life in the bleachers can be a bit of a bitch at times.

https://t.me/DeepDives/38571
20   Ceffer   2025 Mar 5, 12:54am  

And.... thus we trip the light fantastic back the Republic now? Or not?

23   WookieMan   2025 Mar 5, 6:12am  

zzyzzx says

Even if we really did promise the Soviet Union that we would not expand NATO, the Soviet Union no longer exists.

Russia now knows they are weak. WITHOUT NATO's full protection coming at them. We have all the leverage. An agreement was made with a different entity/country. Z is a dip shit, but Russia doesn't have it without going to nukes. Bad idea.

Putin made a mistake, picked on the weak little kid, which Z is. It's back fired. He has bigger friends. Even IF Ukraine was NATO, no one is attacking Russia. It's just an alliance. And now Z has made an ass out of himself after billions in money and military gear were sent his way.

It also makes Europe look weak AF. If you're scared of Russia, handle it. Hopefully diplomatically. People have to stop running to my fucking bank account to pay for this shit. Figure it out.
24   clambo   2025 Mar 5, 7:03am  

USA leaving NATO is a mistake.
It is clearly in the USA national interest that Europe be secure from Putin or whoever may replace him.
Russia's military is today weak, but he has missiles; he's like a monkey with a hand grenade, don't get too close to him.
25   WookieMan   2025 Mar 5, 7:28am  

clambo says

USA leaving NATO is a mistake.

Leaving NATO likely wouldn't be permanent. The way Trump works is he'd leave, see the reaction and then likely rejoin in a year. Europe has to put its big boy pants on basically. If we left with the secret intention to return, it would be a win.

Europe needs to know they would be toast without us in WWI and II. Pushed the Soviet Union out. At some point they have to own where they live. If you don't want to protect it, you're kind of on your own. I ain't paying it. Tax season, so I'm pissed right now. Europe is fucking trash. I don't want a dime going over there. They're lazy, egotistically fucktards.
26   MolotovCocktail   2025 Mar 5, 12:29pm  

clambo says


It is clearly in the USA national interest that Europe be secure from Putin or whoever may replace him.


What interest would that be?

NATO was for the Cold War. That ended 34 years ago. Russia is no Soviet Union - which was a threat because of Communism spreading if left unchecked.

And Russia is on a demographic cliff worse than Italy & South Korea has. Possibly worse than China's. They have done wonders with arms production but won't be able to field the army they need to have just to keep the RF together, let alone threaten Europe.

France and the UK have nukes. The Germans and Swedes could probably field their own within 8 - 12 months.

If the Eloi can't or won't secure their own damn security, then this isn't an alliance.
27   Ceffer   2025 Mar 5, 1:07pm  

The Euros are under direction from the tunnel demons and soul harvesters to start WWIII. They are promised that their bloodlines will be preserved when they dive into their fallout tunnels or flee to the Southern Hemisphere, jets at the ready.

They sold out to the empowerments that made them the prison camp guards and harvesters of human slaughter and suffering, and they are going lockstep in that direction. Their job is to maximize human suffering and death for their demon portal masters. We are only a husbanded food source to them.

There will be no planned cease of the Ukrainian situation from them until their crime scene is obliterated or WWIII is instigated. Those are their goals and their assigned missions. IHLlary was a fawning pawn of the Globalists (Rockefeller/Rhodes) and was 100 percent on board with the WWIII theme, and we might be grateful to the fulsome incompetency and shallow criminality of the Biden regime because their demoralization tactics also created gross incompetency at achieving the mission.

Just look at the disgusting Dem Congress Klowns, a Chinese fire drill of greed, incompetence, treason and various subscriptions to idiot foolishness with pidgins and trannies at the helm. Some of them mimic the Euro Baphomets in admiration of their Satanic foreign masters and idols, but they are behind the curve of the ancients.
29   Ceffer   2025 Mar 5, 4:37pm  

Booger says





I think she's the reason for double layer burkas with no escape clause but a flap for dick insertion.
30   MolotovCocktail   2025 Mar 6, 7:38am  

OkDOGEisAmountingToSomething says

France and the UK have nukes. The Germans and Swedes could probably field their own within 8 - 12 months.


Well, well, well...


31   stereotomy   2025 Mar 6, 11:24am  

Hell yeah! If Germany wants to develop a nuclear deterrent, they'll have to start up all their as yet not demolished nuclear reactors. Better yet, they'll have to design additional reactors for high neutron flux so that they can create more plutonium and tritium for thermonuclear weapons.
32   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Mar 6, 1:43pm  

1980s Germany: 99 Luftballoons! Keine Nukes!
1990s Germany: Keine Nukes!
2000s Germany: Keine Nukes!
2010s Germany: Keine Nukes! Halt Der Radioactivitat!!! Fukushima!!!
2020s Germany: Mehr Nukes!
33   stereotomy   2025 Mar 6, 2:24pm  

How fucked up a national psyche is if a country lost two major wars, the first which was kind of not their fault, and the second of which has yet to be objectively adjudged. After WWII, the finance minister of Germany was executed, while the first post-war finance minister of Japan who adopted the same economic plans as the Germans was mad head of the Bank of Japan?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=princes+of+the+yen&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dp5Ac7ap_MAY

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste