Comments 1 - 33 of 33 Search these comments
Poor Orban. 😭 Being left one-on-one with very well armed Nazis whom he's been pissing off for the last 10 years is no picnic. 😱
On the bright side the fat fuck is good for at least 5 lampshades. 🤣
I like Orban
NATO should be dissolved. We won.
Kicked the Warsaw pacts ass.
The Associated Press ran the story, headlined “Why Trump's joint remarks to Congress won't be a 'State of the Union' address.” Nor will wine-soaked Nancy Pelosi be anywhere near a copy of the speech she can drunkenly rip up.
The President’s first address to the joint Congress starts at 9pm EST. It is not called a State of the Union, as most first-year addresses aren’t, but a “Joint Address to Congress.”
There is reason to think it won’t be any ordinary kind of joint address. First of all, the President mysteriously teased in all caps yesterday that it will be a "big” night and he will “tell it like it is.” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told Fox News over the weekend people can “expect fireworks.”
A White House official told reporters that the address’s theme will be the "Renewal of the American Dream.” According to the anonymous preview, Trump will “focus on his record thus far, the economy, border security, and what the official called the President's plans for ‘peace around the globe.’”
White House spokeslady Karoline Leavitt promised it “will be MUST-SEE TV.”
Social media is abuzz with speculation about the auspicious date, March 4th, mainly because it was the original Constitutional date for the Inauguration, later moved up to January 20th by federal statute in 1933. The very first Congress met on March 4th in 1788. It’s also the date when 28 other presidents have made similar addresses.
There is a sense that Trump picked the date on purpose for its historic significance. ...
I wouldn’t dare offer any predictions. Everything Trump has done since he took office has defied predictions or even reasonable expectations. It has also been meticulously planned out.
What I expect for tonight’s address is the unexpected. Stay tuned.
That board-wiping tool role may well explain why, when Yeltsin and Putin repeatedly expressed desire to join the NATO, the Deep-State controlled "western leaders" sniggered at the idea. NATO was set up to disarm Europe, and making Europeans easier to harvest.
Nah. I predict more overt asslicking and creampuffing for Israel than has ever been done in the history of man, yet a sizeable portion of zoomers and alphas still won't get the message.

Even if we really did promise the Soviet Union that we would not expand NATO, the Soviet Union no longer exists.
USA leaving NATO is a mistake.
It is clearly in the USA national interest that Europe be secure from Putin or whoever may replace him.
France and the UK have nukes. The Germans and Swedes could probably field their own within 8 - 12 months.

If he does, that would be MAGAwesome!