1
0

The War that Pat Wanted


 invite response                  
2025 Apr 28, 3:39am   93 views  1 comment

by PanicanDemoralizer   ➕follow (10)   ignore (3)  

Not our Pat, but the Paleocon hero, Buchanan.


He told the San Francisco Chronicle that he would support covert action to get rid of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, and in other respects he seems more activist than Bush. Speaking to a group of Croatian-Americans in Burlingame, Calif., Buchanan said: ‘I’ll tell you what I’m going to do in the campaign: Every time the question, ‘Pat Buchanan, are you an isolationist?’ comes up, I’ll say, ‘Listen, I’m for recognizing the independence of Croatia.’ ” (Bush is still reluctant to do so.) As President, Buchanan added, he would “send the Sixth Fleet on a courtesy call to Dubrovnik,” the historic Adriatic port city that has been caught in the recent fighting between Serbia and Croatia.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-01-27-me-530-story.html


“Pat Buchanan, one can say, permitted a dual loyalty to influence him. Although he had denied any vital American interest in either Kuwait’s oilfields or Iraq’s oilfields or its aggression, in l991 he urged that the Sixth Fleet be sent to Dubrovnik to shield the Catholics of Croatia from Serbian attack. “Croatia is not some faraway desert emirate,” he explained. “It is a ‘piece of the continent, a part of the main,’ a Western republic that belonged to the Habsburg empire and was for centuries the first line of defense of Christian Europe. For their ceaseless resistance to the Ottoman Turks, Croatia was proclaimed by Pope Leo X to be the ‘Antemurale Christianitatis,’ the bulwark of Christianity.””

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/pats-dual-loyalty-rich-lowry/

Pat Buchanan was against the First Iraq War and it's very limited aims to kick Saddam out of Kuwait a US ally and a major source of cheap oil... but wanted the USN to intervene for Croatia in 1992.

In actuality, the Paleocons were birthed in the 80s, however much they pretend their roots go back much earlier.

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   PanicanDemoralizer   2025 May 7, 11:56am  

AmericanKulak says


In actuality, the Paleocons were birthed in the 80s, however much they pretend their roots go back much earlier.

Might have to write something up about this.

Paleocons play a con game where they pretend to be the "True Conservatives" that were "Pushed out" by Buckley. In reality, the Republican party has never been an ultra social con, distributionist, hyper-isolationist party. From long before FDR to day one. It's Grant, McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, Hoover, Eisenhower, Nixon... none of whom were remotely "Paleocon". Neocons were also a nothing burger during the Cold War; Reagan put a few of the influential ones in positions they could do no damage.

A guy like Thomas Fleming or Pat Buchanan? No way.

The funny thing is that both whinged about intervention, except during the Yugoslav War. Buchanan famously wanted the 6th Fleet to visit Dubrovnik; but Fleming was on the side of the Serbs.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste