by Al_Sharpton_for_President follow (6)
« First « Previous Comments 295 - 334 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
He was only at college for one semester and dropped out. Top 5% Test Scores

ABC News said he had a 34 composite score for ACT.
AD says
ABC News said he had a 34 composite score for ACT.
That's excellent, Ivy League level, less than 1.5% get that.
Most parents have little clue what their teen/adult kids are doing on the inner tubes.
Apparently, he had a roommate and was living elsewhere.
So you think Tyler Robinson was dialed in like MK Ultra or influenced ?
Yes he was not living with his Republican parents, as he was studying as an electrician apprentice.
But he had to associate with others, like classmates, people at his part time job, etc. So he was that coy as far as the plan even if the plan was to be a patsy ?




The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim on his podcast.
The New York Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that Jewish communities are “pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites” that they want people to stop using against them. However, Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing The New York Times’ correction to be made.
“An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” the correction reads.
In actuality, Kirk clarified that not all Jews are pushing hatred onto white people. He stated that certain communities have pushed it by supporting left-wing causes such as Black Lives Matter.
Shooter was living tranny boyfriend. Anyone verified this?
Wow. Dad turned him in!

Tyler Robinson's social media presence includes the following:
Discord: Robinson's Discord account was shared with the authorities, but no content promoting violence was found. 2
X (formerly Twitter): Robinson is registered as an "unaffiliated" voter, meaning he is neither a Democrat nor a Republican. 24
Social media posts: Images of Robinson from 2017 were found, showing him wearing a costume of President Donald Trump for Halloween. 3
Charlie Kirk’s assassin surrendered to Utah police at 11pm on Thursday, September 11th.
Earlier that day, Utah father Matt Robinson saw what looked like his son’s picture appear everywhere in the media. He also knew his son had recently raged about hating Charlie Kirk. His blood froze in its veins.
Matt immediately drove two hours to his son’s apartment in a nearby city, and confronted lanky gamer Tyler, 22. “Tyler, is this you? This looks like you,” Matt frantically asked.
Despite initial resistance, Tyler finally confessed.
Matt pleaded with his son to surrender. At first, Tyler insisted he preferred to kill himself rather than be captured. Matt recruited help from a youth pastor from the Washington, Utah family’s local LDS church, who convinced the young man to give himself up, and ultimately accompanied Tyler and his father to a police station in St. George.
In other words, the FBI was not required to hunt Tyler down. His family did the right thing.
Stephen Miller is going nuclear…
“This is not fringe anymore. Tape, after tape. Federal workers, bureaucrats, educators, professors, nurses… people celebrating and cheering the assassination of Charlie Kirk! There is a domestic terrorist movement growing in this country.”
While top Democrats remained silent, rank-and-file progressives whined about invasions of their First Amendment speech. In other words, they implicitly argued that, even if their words were hateful, they should still enjoy constitutional protection.
That is legally false.
First of all, the Supreme Court has long and repeatedly held that speech intended to incite violence is not protected by the First Amendment. There are boundaries, of course; to be considered “inciteful,” the speech must meet certain conditions and not simply reflect some general sentiment. “Let’s fight back!”, for example, is not inciteful speech.
But that’s not what we’re looking at here, is it?
Second, and maybe more important, employees generally do not enjoy any First Amendment protection, even for their private words posted to social media. Private employers aren’t constrained by the First Amendment. Only the government is.
In early 2021, I consulted with many employees who’d been fired for posting things on social media questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election. In one case, a woman who’d worked at a commercial real estate broker’s office for 22 years was fired after posting a meme on her private Facebook page amusingly captioned, “Joe and the Hoe.”
I had to sadly inform her that, since she was an “at will” employee, there was nothing that could legally be done about it. ...
Not only that, but Democrats have no problem firing government employees for speech that they don’t like. In 2022, Reuters ran a long, rambling story about Professor David Clements, who was fired by New Mexico University for his videos alleging cheating in the 2020 election and for questioning the vaccines ...
And then there’s Colorado election clerk Tina Peters, who was fired and imprisoned for “unauthorized access” crimes, after she provided journalists with evidence of voting irregularities in Dominion voting machines.
Since Democrats cheered the cancellation of election deniers, anti-maskers, and anti-vaxxers, not to mention people who compared covid to the flu, it will be hard for them now to object to the firing of folks who don’t just express unpopular political opinions, but actually cheer for and incite political violence.




Shooter was living tranny boyfriend. Anyone verified this?
Wow. Dad turned him in!
Yes, not strictly for justice, but to prevent any further murders.


« First « Previous Comments 295 - 334 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,688 comments by 15,721 users - Ceffer, UveBeenNudged1 online now