patrick.net

Been there!

Patrick says

Ah, yes Plymouth Rock. Home of the Johnny-come-lately colonists.

Yet, the rationale given for "Arctic panic" of the current admin is "receding ice". So they seem to buy that GW BS too.

Obligatory: Dan Britt - Orbits and Ice Ages, The History of Climate"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yze1YAz_LYM

EDIT: I know it's a badtube link, but one of the key points of this talk is that up until ~50 million years ago, there were no ice caps. What happened is that India collided with South Asia, raising the Himalayas and the Tibeten Plateau. This exposed gigatons of rock to weathering, which sucked all the CO2 out of the atmosphere. This made the climate of the Earth susceptible to the Milankovich cycles (variations in the Earth's orbit and nutation) and led to periodic ice ages ever since.

Not only are the Chindians fucking with our country's jobs, but the very earth of India and South Asia have been fucking with the climate for 50,000,000 years.

Fuck Mt. Meru, I want temperate climate worldwide.

My take is who cares? The data you present makes sense to me, but we can't make a difference in anything either way. Our orbit isn't perfect. We move 1 mile closer temps might jump 0.1ºF. We're just spinning around this sun of a bitch with no control.

Given the distance CO2 is a none factor. Solar flares from the sun. Ice caps melt. Tectonic plates move. Which is the cause of water level rise? Yet we place it on CO2 that helps trees and crops grow that are good for us. So we have food and move "if" the water level rises.

All the facts for anything get buried at the end. I always start at the bottom of an article and go up. You can lie and get away with it with most people. I tend to read online content backwards.

It's important to point out that the climate has always varied and that humans are not a significant influence on it because right now there is an attempt to grab power and reduce our standard of living by declaring a "climate emergency".

The sun's energy output is not constant, so no clear conclusion about humans causing anything can't be made, ever.

Also, global warming occurred at the same time on Mars and Titan, too.

@MolotovCocktail That's super interesting.

Got a link?

Found one:

https://johnstonsarchive.net/environment/warmingplanets.html

Mars: Various spacecraft have observed Mars from orbit from 1971 to the present, many able to provide a long baseline of climate observations. In 2001 Malin et al. (2001) found that images of Mars' south polar cap taken one Martian year apart showed small retreats (of about 1-3 meters) in the cover of frozen carbon dioxide. This frozen CO2 sublimes directly from ice to gas in Mars' thin atmosphere. Observations over the next few Martian years' (one Martian year = 1.88 Earth years) showed continuing retreat, resulting in expanding pits in the residual polar cap (Benson and James, 2005; Thomas et al., 2005; James et al., 2007). This retreat has now been observed over four Martian years.
Several global warming believers have been quick to state that this is a regional climate change. However, Fenton et al. (2006) and Fenton et al. (2007) have identified trends in changes in the reflectivity of the surface dust on Mars from 1976 to 2000. From observed albedo changes they have used models to estimate a global annual air temperature increase of 0.65° C. The direct cause of this predicted temperature change is a change in the distribution of darker dust on Mars' surface, and the resulting warming could be a factor in the retreat of Mars' south polar ice. One proposed root cause of this climate change could be slight shifts in Mars' axial tilt or orbital eccentricity: such changes have also been proposed as key drivers in changing Earth's climate between glacial and interglacial conditions (i.e. starting and ending ice ages). These shifts involve very long timescales on Mars as well as Earth, making this an inadequate explanation for the changes observed currently. Internal variations in Mars' climate, as opposed to influences from solar output changes, are likely at work, but this issue is unresolved.

Patrick says

MolotovCocktail That's super interesting.

Got a link?

Patrick says

https://x.com/amuse/status/1921881216283787423

https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1921844841383625064

Patrick says

https://x.com/amuse/status/1921881216283787423

They're gay. Supposed to be 90ºF Thursday here. I'll be outside mowing and getting shit done. Polluting the earth and making it warmer because that's what I want... lol.

If you can't handle 78ºF you are a legit faggot. Come to IL when it's 95ºF and a heat index of 103ºF and 95% humidity, 70% dew point plus. I'm not joking, I love it. Go outside and sweat it off. Grab some water and cleanse yourself. A natural steam room in my state is a blessing. Can burn off the beer and other shit just by sweating and doing yard work. I feel better.

https://joannenova.com.au/2025/05/no-one-knows-what-caused-the-blackout-but-spain-is-using-more-gas-and-nukes-and-less-solar/

https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/updates-may-2025

Patrick says

" https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/updates-may-2025 "

CO2 is not warming anything because the Earth is not radiating heat
at the frequency which CO2 absorbs, namely 15 microns. Given that
Earth is roughly at 59°F then our planet is radiating unimpeded into
space at 10 microns.

Besides, CO2 is life! Without CO2 there is no photosynthesis, there are
no plants, no animals and no life on this planet! In addition, humans are
exhaling 50,000 ppm CO2. So the notion that CO2 is pollution is bunk.
We need more trees and more CO2. Not less.

https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-mit-professor-net-zero-hoax/

Dr. Richard Lindzen, a world-renowned atmospheric physicist and MIT professor emeritus, is sounding the alarm about the globalist push to enforce so-called “Net Zero” policies.

Lindzen is warning the public about the global campaign to comply with “Net Zero” by 2050.

In his view, the plan is not only astronomically expensive but virtually useless. ...

“If you reach Net Zero by 2050, if you do it worldwide, you avoid about a third of a degree of warming,” says Lindzen in a new interview.

“If it’s just Europe and the Anglosphere, it’s closer to a tenth of a degree.

“So you have avoided a tenth of a degree of warming at a cost of probably tens of trillions of dollars.

“Doesn’t seem like a bargain to me,” he adds.

“How far will the population go in saying, we will sacrifice ourselves for a symbolic gesture?” ...

“When somebody says the change of a tenth of a degree, or when [UN Secretary-General António] Guterres says, if it changes a half-degree, we’re finished as a species, this is an existential threat – people have to ask, what the hell are they talking about?”

He dismisses climate doomsday predictions as political theatrics.

“2030 will pass. 2050 will pass,” he states.

“Fifty years will pass.

“There will be no climate catastrophe.”

43 years ago, Florida was going to be a quarter underwater