Comments 1 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
Let's see how the mainstream media spins the message around.
I also suspect the War-in-Venezuela rumors were a Trump Trick to get the Media to cover it, hoping for a "Evil Warmonger" moment.

How can Trump claim that he caused drug prices to have decreased 400, 500 600 percent? Are we being paid to take medications now?
Early this morning, the New York Times did what it loves best. It ridiculed and mischaracterized the Republican President, in an nasty story headlined, “Trump Delivers Attacks and Deflects Blame for Americans’ Economic Worries.” Two days ago, the White House announced the quickly scheduled speech, which started last night at 9 pm EST, ran for about 20 minutes, and preempted regularly scheduled primetime programming on all the alphabet networks.
I’ll concede that, in terms of mechanics, it wasn’t Trump’s best. He speed-read the speech, producing a kind of high-energy monotone (for him), which allowed salivating critics to describe it as shouting. Not crazy old man shouting, like some other former official I could name. It was more like someone had told him, “you have to finish before the 9:30 shows start, and for Pete’s sake, speak up.” (The story ended with this: “Afterwards, he asked how he had done. Ms. Wiles replied, ‘I told you 20 minutes and you were 20 minutes on the dot.’” So.)
In any case: “Mr. Trump spoke loudly and at a fast clip,” the Times giddily noted. Yeah, we get it. He had to wrap it up before the commercial break.
But in terms of content, the speech was a knockout; almost too jam-packed, nearly too much material for a 20-minute address. That’s because there is too much good news. It was probably hard to decide what to leave out. Supporters noted how cleverly the President forced the media to cover his successes, by promoting them himself...
It was hard to find an issue that wasn’t mentioned. He declared no wars, and announced no new policies (except one— active U.S. servicemembers will get a $1,776 Christmas bonus from tariff revenue. That’s nice.) Rather, the speech was a mission review from his first 11 months in office, with a particular focus on prices.
The mask is now off. The Times got right to it, in the article’s second sentence: “The president has been on the defensive recently over the issue of affordability, which congressional Democrats hope to use to sweep back into power during the midterm elections.” (Meaning, the Times hopes to use affordability to help sweep Democrats back into power, but whatever.) ...
It’s wild that the Democrats could create Bidenflation, then, with the full cooperation of the media, gaslight everybody that it’s Trump’s fault because he isn’t fixing it fast enough. It’s like those twins who murdered their parents demanding sympathy for being orphans now. ...
And perhaps most importantly, he confirmed real wages were rapidly improving. “After years of record-setting falling incomes, our policies are boosting take-home pay at a historic pace,” the President said.
We can’t lower prices enough to dig our way out of Bidenflation. Wages must rise faster than inflation. It’s the only way.
The only reaction quote the Times cared to include came from Trump’s top Congressional enemy, ratlike Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), 93.5, who likes to puts the cheese on BBQ burgers while they are still frozen. I did not make that up. He probably also eats raw chicken. “President Trump’s speech just showed he lives in a bubble,” said the generic statement hastily excreted by the Senator’s office. “People are feeling squeezed harder and harder every day and tonight Donald Trump took a victory lap.”
One imagines Trump’s speech must have been solid if Schumer couldn’t come up with anything more specific to criticize.
Congress voted to stop it twice, both votes failed. So it’s happening, and yes it’s for oil. Probably next year. It’s Christmas.
If anyone has the transcript, please post it.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
Congress voted to stop it twice, both votes failed. So it’s happening, and yes it’s for oil. Probably next year. It’s Christmas.
Cool, if we didn't enforce the Monroe Doctrine we'd be really in trouble.
How can Trump claim that he caused drug prices to have decreased 400, 500 600 percent? Are we being paid to take medications now?
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
Congress voted to stop it twice, both votes failed. So it’s happening, and yes it’s for oil. Probably next year. It’s Christmas.
Cool, if we didn't enforce the Monroe Doctrine we'd be really in trouble.
Except we hadn't enforced it for ages. If we did there won't be Kommie Kunts regime sitting in Cuba.
Do we really believe the average American is $1,000 above inflation?
Except we hadn't enforced it for ages. If we did there won't be Kommie Kunts regime sitting in Cuba.
Do we really believe the average American is $1,000 above inflation?
Absolutely no brakes on this train.
TrumpRx replacing Obamacare, so beautiful. No more government hosted rigged "Healthcare" market where ludicrous deductibles at ludicrous prices only become "merely" ridiculous with big fat subsidies for the insurance companies. Next step: Kill Medicare Plans, the same kind of bullshit.
$1776 bonus for all military
Every single new job (almost all private sector, not Bideniflation era Government Jobs) went to native born Americans.
$1000 wage increase after inflation for the average American. More than that for factory workers and miners.