patrick.net

That is sort of like asking the Dems to commit voluntary election hari kari. They will not abide.

Trump will have to find cause to make it an executive order.

Ceffer says

Trump will have to find cause to make it an executive order.

Why do ppl think presidents can simply make EOs for anything and everything?

They can't.

Won't pass in the Senate and probably not even in the House.

Uniparty will make sure this is DOA.

There is no rational logical reason it shouldn’t pass. It will certainly flush out the elected officials that vote against it. I would imagine there is a heavy lobby by the voting machine companies. Certainly fodder for the 26 elections. How many times does an election have to end at the supreme court before we change the law? I’m not sure what partisan voter initiatives means, as my IQ has dropped to the 120s thanks to the wonders of alcohol.🍺

SharkyP says

There is no rational logical reason it shouldn’t pass.

Yes there is. We just listed a few.

Senate won't pass because of filibuster, easy.

And the identity of the senator(s) placing the hold is kept secret unless they want to go public.

MolotovCocktail says

Why do ppl think presidents can simply make EOs for anything and everything?

They can't.

He'll have to do it under emergency powers. Foreign interference in elections is an act of war.

Ceffer says

MolotovCocktail says

Why do ppl think presidents can simply make EOs for anything and everything?

They can't.

He'll have to do it under emergency powers. Foreign interference in elections is an act of war.

Riight. Has war been declared? No?

MolotovCocktail says

Why do ppl think presidents can simply make EOs for anything and everything?

They can't.

he can secure election locations where it has been established that there is corrupt elections being ran there.
They can invoke Civil Rights laws to have the National Guard deployed and force Democrat to NOT intimidate Republican poll workers and disenfranchise them. He can't make them not do anything they claim their laws supports. But he can EO that the Voters aren't commiting any Federal Crimes, and the workers at the polls aren't violating anyone's constitutional rights. The Guard can't audit the votes in real time, but they can damn well protect Nick Shirley(or like minded people) work as a poll workers and make damn sure everything is on the up and up, without intimidation or threats.

Besides, let's be real here. Nick Shirley is the only thing that has rattled the Minnesota corruption and fraud to its core. No Government agency could have done what Nick has done. So Yes Trump has a duty and responsibility to make damn sure Nick Shirley and anyone that looks like him, to participate in the vote verification process. Democrats sue all the time to be poll watchers, and have legal teams wrapped around the process. For the first time, Conservatives will be doing the same thing to them, they have done to us for years. But we're using to prove they have been cheating for years, while excluding the very people they falsely claim are suppressing and intimidating them.

Trump didn't have DOJ or command to prevent the 2020 election theft. Since then, Courts has given him out right authority that he can make sure Federal election laws are enforced. There's no Federal law that says they can't have drop boxes, can't have mail in votes, don't have to have IDs. But it still is Federal law any voter has to be an official vote, by an official lawfully registered voter, and can only vote one time. No dead voters, no illegal aliens, and double scans, no ballots that don't align with the scanner.

Republicans should be in place for every step of the way, ballot creation, paper procurement, and machine certification. Have a back up plan for misprinted, and misaligned ballots, inspect them weeks before they are sent out.

The passage or failure of this Act will only bring more attention to the right places, where attention is needed.

Tenpoundbass says

he can secure election locations where it has been established that there is corrupt elections being ran there.

Ceffer was stating he can legislate the SAFE Act with an EO. He can't.

You mention other things unrelated to that.

MolotovCocktail says

Ceffer was stating he can legislate the SAFE Act with an EO. He can't.

You mention other things unrelated to that.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

- Require photo ID to vote
- Require citizenship verification to register to vote
- Require states use paper ballots for federal elections
- Voter roll maintenance requirements
- Requires mail in ballots be received on election day
- Bans ballot harvesting
- Bans ranked choice voting
- Bans Universal vote by mail
- Bans partisan voter initiatives

Tenpoundbass says

There's no Federal law that says they can't have drop boxes, can't have mail in votes, don't have to have IDs. But it still is Federal law any voter has to be an official vote, by an official lawfully registered voter, and can only vote one time. No dead voters, no illegal aliens, and double scans, no ballots that don't align with the scanner.

Tulsi Gabbard's presence at the Georgia raid signaled foreign interference, since domestic intelligence is not supposed to interfer with strictly domestic issues. She would not have been there unless the issue of foreign interference deemed, and her presence signaled that.

Pundit Juan O Savin has stated that on the basis of foreign interference, Trump will declare a national emergency and issue the 'order' on that basis. The order has already been processed and vetted legally. It is just a matter of public education and timing now.

All Federal voter rolls will be vacated and voters will have to re-register with valid ID and notarization before they can vote at strictly Federal voting locations. No machines, paper ballots, same day counting etc.

States are still free to engage election fraud tactics at their peril. People will wonder why Federal and State election require two different standards.

That order will embrace OP principles stated above without legislation. Legislation would be nice, but the Democrats purely survive on election fraud achieved through various foreign and domestic entities. They will stand on election fraud to the bitter end.

Stupid idea, unconstitutional possibly and will be challenged AND definitely not enforced. Republican dream, swarm of cheap labor that can’t citizen or vote.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

Stupid idea, unconstitutional possibly and will be challenged AND definitely not enforced. Republican dream, swarm of cheap labor that can’t citizen or vote.

How is this unconstitutional? This is a great idea, esp. since it's codified into law whereas EOs get blocked by activist judges and expire eventually.

mell says

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

Stupid idea, unconstitutional possibly and will be challenged AND definitely not enforced. Republican dream, swarm of cheap labor that can’t citizen or vote.

How is this unconstitutional? This is a great idea, esp. since it's codified into law whereas EOs get blocked by activist judges and expire eventually.

It’s illegal to put a poll tax. And you think Democrats will enforce it? It’s a stupid idea. Just need to deport.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

mell says

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

Stupid idea, unconstitutional possibly and will be challenged AND definitely not enforced. Republican dream, swarm of cheap labor that can’t citizen or vote.

How is this unconstitutional? This is a great idea, esp. since it's codified into law whereas EOs get blocked by activist judges and expire eventually.

It’s illegal to put a poll tax. And you think Democrats will enforce it? It’s a stupid idea. Just need to deport.

There is no poll tax. And it's entirely constitutional. That's leftoid bullshit whinging about the "cost to meet the requirements" lol, as opposed to rampant cheating by having zero requirements, like in CA, where voting integrity is worse than many banana republics

Tenpoundbass says

MolotovCocktail says

Ceffer was stating he can legislate the SAFE Act with an EO. He can't.

You mention other things unrelated to that.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

- Require photo ID to vote
- Require citizenship verification to register to vote
- Require states use paper ballots for federal elections
- Voter roll maintenance requirements
- Requires mail in ballots be received on election day
- Bans ballot harvesting
- Bans ranked choice voting
- Bans Universal vote by mail
- Bans partisan voter initiatives

Tenpoundbass says

There's no Federal law that says they can't have drop boxes, can't have mail in votes, don't have to have IDs. But it still is Federal law any voter has to be an official vote, by an official lawfully registered voter, and can only vote one time. No dead voters, no illegal aliens, and double scans, no ballots that don't align with the scanner.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

It’s illegal to put a poll tax

What poll tax?

mell says

There is no poll tax. And it's entirely constitutional. That's leftoid bullshit whinging about the "cost to meet the requirements" lol, as opposed to rampant cheating by having zero requirements, like in CA, where voting integrity is worse than many banana republics

Massie's reason to vote against it, probably. "The couple of billion out of trillions is too much! Fiscally irresponsible! Government overreach! Leave the Dems alone!"

Professors Cloward and Piven of Cloward Piven Strategy standing behind President Bill Clinton when he signed the Motor Voter Law.

MolotovCocktail says

So where am I saying unrelated things in my post above that you most likely didn't read?
What I said in my post was all of the things he would like to see legislation to put a stop to. He can EO the enforcement of all of the Election laws that Democrat State laws tries to circumvent. Trump can't stop States from trying to run through shitty votes, but the States can't stop from making sure every vote passes the sniff test on the Federal end. Sure go ahead and throw a bunch of dead and illegal voters in the batch, but Trump can stop them from being counted. And I say he most definitely will in the next two elections anyway. I don't think the Save Act or anything like it, will pass until we replace every RINO up for reelection in November.

It won’t pass, unconstitutional fight will be big, but even if it does it’s not enforceable. I don’t get the gullible who think making it double triple illegal to do that will make a difference.

Those who aren’t following laws now, won’t follow after this either. Republicans living a pipe dream fantasy of “we can bring illegals here to work, and it won’t affect elections if we just pass the bill”. Same selfish and stupid thinking that brought negro slaves and lead to civil war.

Tenpoundbass says

What I said in my post was all of the things he would like to see legislation to put a stop to.

So what? Wishes & Horses, etc.

Tenpoundbass says

He can EO the enforcement of all of the Election laws that Democrat State laws tries to circumvent

So what? Not what I was talking about.

You're the one who didn't read.Tenpoundbass says

I don't think the Save Act or anything like it, will pass until we replace every RINO up for reelection in November.

Agreed.