patrick.net

Patrick says

I suspect that the real problem with Punjab is that it is clearly one of the wealthiest parts of India and could do fine in its own.

So the rest of India fears that it will leave.

Very much like Catalonia in Spain, also a rich province.

I think creating small countries etc. are not needed and by nature Sikhs are not separatists.
If you look at our religion, It is by default accepting of all and unifying the humanity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbat_da_bhala

At the same time Sikhs want to live like equal citizens everywhere while contributing to society positively and are patriotic to land they live in.
Hindooo cult by nature is divisive and treasonous and deliberately trample the rights of Sikhs to make them ask for separation.

What Bharat needs is defeat of Hindooo cult and rise of unifying forces to provide better life to people.
I think what "Bharat" needs is federal system of US, or some kind of European union.
(Note that Europe is all Christian and white but boundaries are based on language.. same can happen in Bharat).

Also Punjab won't survive by itself as it has no sea link.

You're just smitten with the Left's policies that are killing people and creating food insecurities around the world.
There actual political agenda is to starve millions of people to death. So it could be, you're more responsible for your post title than the Hindus are.
They are over there, in no way influencing American politics, while you're over here, bad mouthing the only guy in the world capable of saving the world, while you praise the Jackals and Hyenas trying to destroy the world.
Stop killing your people!

Tenpoundbass says

You're just smitten with the Left's policies that are killing people and creating food insecurities around the world.
There actual political agenda is to starve millions of people to death. So it could be, you're more responsible for your post title than the Hindus are.
They are over there, in no way influencing American politics, while you're over here, bad mouthing the only guy in the world capable of saving the world, while you praise the Jackals and Hyenas trying to destroy the world.
Stop killing your people!

I am not smitten by any red/blue thing. You are smitten by "red" and will follow them blindly even if they kill small farmers and mom/pop businesses.
My loyalty is to common man and small entrepreneur only.

Now tell me who did this to US farmers. They are trying to do same to Bharti farmers who are already struggling massively.
https://time.com/5736789/small-american-farmers-debt-crisis-extinction/
'They're Trying to Wipe Us Off the Map.' Small American Farmers Are Nearing Extinction

DonewithDebate says

I am not smitten by any red/blue thing. You are smitten by "red" and will follow them blindly even if they kill small farmers and mom/pop businesses.
My loyalty is to common man and small entrepreneur only.

If you think fighting for our lives and taking a stance against Communism is a "Red Vs Blue" thing, then go your ass the fuck back home.

I voted for the Democrat Sherriff in Broward this last election, because the interim Sheriff that was put there by DeSantis(A Red guy!) instilled more law and order in Broward county, than I have ever seen since I came here in 1985. The only problem I have with Sheriff Tony now, is he hasn't locked that cocksucker Scott Israel up for being the evil mother fucker he was. But for the last 2 MLK day in South Florida, for the first time in over 20 years. Our highways haven't been hijacked by marauding thugs on Motorcycles and ATV's terrorizing motorists and communities all over South Florida. The BSO put a stop to that shit. We don't see thugs and gangs out in the open like we have for decades.

Name one Democrat worth backing and I'll gladly do it, I have been a lifelong Independent, I voted for Ross Perot, and Ralph Nader every time he ran. I have planned to vote for Donald Trump as an independent voter, ever since he was doing talk shows espousing his politics since the late 80's. When he was threatening to run as an independent.

So I registered to become a Republican so I could vote for him in the 2016, primary.

There now I gave you reasoning and conviction on my views.

Now defend your "Red Vs Blue" lazy cop out rhetoric or shut the fuck up already!

Tenpoundbass says

If you think fighting for our lives and taking a stance against Communism is a "Red Vs Blue" thing, then go your ass the fuck back home.

Communism is against "personal freedom" and also against land owning and small businesses.
When did I say "farmers" land should be given to Govt or big business in cahoots with govt... I always favored small business and personal freedom.

Now like Hindooo morons here who just call unifying Sikh religion separatists WITHOUT ANY PROOF to project their own discriminatory/treasonous cult.. You can carry on.. I have no interest if deep down you love communism.

So you have no American convictions, but you sit your ass over here taking advantage of our freedoms and everything it affords you. While you besmirch America and our way of life, with your blasé attitude while we discuss our problems. You seek to diminish our fears and concerns, while you worry and toil over what is going on India while deriding Hindus.

You have no convictions.

I'm, unlike YOU, am living in the country I'm defend and concerned about.
While YOU on the other hand, live in the country you are detached and disassociated in the day to day politics, while you finger point about the pollical upheavals in your country where your allegiance lies, where you are powerless to do dick all about it.

You're just a finger pointing shit talker that's all. Red vs Blue my ass!

Tenpoundbass says

So you have no American convictions, but you sit your ass over here taking advantage of our freedoms and everything it affords you. While you besmirch America and our way of life, with your blasé attitude while we discuss our problems. You seek to diminish our fears and concerns, while you worry and toil over what is going on India while deriding Hindus.

You have no convictions.

I'm, unlike YOU, am living in the country I'm defend and concerned about.
While YOU on the other hand, live in the country you are detached and disassociated in the day to day politics, while you finger point about the pollical upheavals in your country where your allegiance lies, where you are powerless to do dick all about it.

You're just a finger pointing shit talker that's all. Red vs Blue my ass!

I have very strong convictions without boundaries. It doesn't matter where I sit, I won't be like you or Hindooo always figuring out ways to divide humanity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbat_da_bhala

Sikhs are never powerless, They are the only minority which have always fought against tyranny irrespective of consequences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charhdi_Kala

https://twitter.com/gauravsabnis/status/1453303762051813382
Imagine if the next time a Hindu opens a restaurant or hotel or convenience store or tech startup in the US and mobs of evangelicals show up shouting "If you want to stay in America, you have to say Jesus Christ is Our Lord & Savior".
...
Anand (Gujarat). #Hindu extremists opposing the opening of a restaurant owned a Muslim.They are sloughing slogans "If you want to stay in India, you will have to say Jai Sri Ram". #Hindutva.#RSS

Hindooo cult is truly insecure.
May be All Hindooo cultists in US needs to be deported if Found with Hindooo land flags to give them tastes of their medicine.

Any time somebody seen with "Hindoo Land" flag should be declared terrorist to match their inhumanity and intolerance.
https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/1453172497604648962
Kashmir students who celebrated Pakistan’s victory over India in the #T20WorldCup booked under terror law http://aje.io/edn8qn

https://twitter.com/iJasOberoi/status/1452647405799686147
Millions have given up the Indian citizenship for countries like England, Australia etc.
Most of them still support & celebrate the Indian cricket team when it plays against their new home country.
Should they be lynched?
STOP this nonsense that an Indian can’t cheer for Pak.

Where is "Farmers Lives Matter" protest Hindooo cult?

Yes! This is good news.

Judging people based on their race is racist.

Judging people based on their sex is sexist.

Patrick says

Yes! This is good news.

Judging people based on their race is racist.

Judging people based on their sex is sexist.

Very True.

So far, my wife and I have taken about three doses apiece of horse ivermectin. I took my first two doses only to see if there were any ill effects i.e. upset stomach, diarrhea, etc. and there were none that I could tell. My wife also felt nothing. She got a cold, felt bad, so took two doses on two days and she said she went from feeling bad to feeling fine and cold free, her energy came back.

I started getting a cold yesterday. Woke up, sniffles, eyes were puffing up and itchy, I was sneezing like crazy, felt congested and coughy, so I took a dose of ivermectin. After a few hours, head cleared up a bit and all symptoms reduced to mild sniffles.

I am not recommending taking ivermectin, these are again low number testimonials without controls, but my wife and I are sold that it helps with viral illness. Hay tastes a lot better, too.

Amazon banned selling it for a while, but they are selling it again through various feed and animal stores.

Now the women who originally took his job are giving him blow jobs because he is rich.

https://www.vibesofindia.com/no-muslim-ownership-in-any-area-where-there-are-hindu-temples-gujarat-town-sprinkles-gangajal-to-purify-area/

Patrick says

Yes! This is good news.

Judging people based on their race is racist.

Judging people based on their sex is sexist.

Judging is ok. Women are weaker is a judgement, but it’s accurate, it’s not sexist.
Treating people like shit based on those is racist.

Just felt like clarifying view.

Fortwaynemobile says

Patrick says

Yes! This is good news.

Judging people based on their race is racist.

Judging people based on their sex is sexist.

Judging is ok. Women are weaker is a judgement, but it’s accurate, it’s not sexist.
Treating people like shit based on those is racist.

Just felt like clarifying view.

Not every woman is weaker than man.
Any one on this page will knock down most of the men.
https://americantopteam.com/fighters/women-fighters/

On what basis you say woman are weaker than men?

DonewithDebate says

On what basis you say woman are weaker than men?

Most women are weaker than most men.

All woman are weaker than the strongest 10% of men.

But by "judging" I meant judging negatively. I don't mean anything negative by the fact that women are on average weaker than men. They just are.

I also tried it myself and found no ill effects.

I figure about 1/7 of the horse dose is appropriate for a man weighing about 1/7th of a horse.

Patrick says

DonewithDebate says

On what basis you say woman are weaker than men?

Most women are weaker than most men.

All woman are weaker than the strongest 10% of men.

But by "judging" I meant judging negatively. I don't mean anything negative by the fact that women are on average weaker than men. They just are.

Majority of men are weaker than in shape athletic women.
With age based on what I see , Most women last men are more functional 50+ .

It is very misleading to say women are weaker. If a random meat eating white/black American woman is pitched against random vegetarian Hindooo guy, I will bet woman to come on top.

DonewithDebate says

It is very misleading to say women are weaker.

Not at all. It's the truth on average, and it's universal across all cultures.

Patrick says

Not at all. It's the truth on average, and it's universal across all cultures.

I think your assumption here is all things equal, Which are never in reality.
The variation in DNA,Diet and age are big factor.
As an example I provided that a "random meat eating black/white woman" will come on top of "random Hindooo vegetarian men".
I am saying based on both DNA and diet.

I think men peak too early in strength compared to women. Based on what I have observed woman fare better in later years.

DonewithDebate says

Majority of men are weaker than in shape athletic women.

Then why do they need me to open jars?

Onvacation says

DonewithDebate says

Majority of men are weaker than in shape athletic women.

Then why do they need me to open jars?

If they can push child out they can open jars too.
I guess some women have this disease to give "petty work" to men to feel superior.

Men need higher hand grip to keep them from squirming away in the midst of intercourse. It's a direct Darwinian feature called 'lock them down' grip strength.

And the stronger women got away and had fewer children.

DonewithDebate says

The variation in DNA,Diet and age are big factor.

Given the same parents, same diet, and same age, men are almost always stronger than women.

Taller, too.

It's just basic human biology.

Patrick says

And the stronger women got away and had fewer children.

May be that's against Darwinism to escape... Women tend to seek physically stronger men in general.

Patrick says

DonewithDebate says

The variation in DNA,Diet and age are big factor.

Given the same parents, same diet, and same age, men are almost always stronger than women.

Taller, too.

It's just basic human biology.

I would say that DNA/Diet is bigger factor than gender.
Do You disagree?

Ceffer says

Men need higher hand grip to keep them from squirming away in the midst of intercourse. It's a direct Darwinian feature called 'lock them down' grip strength.

I disagree, When women want kids they will hold men even stronger to not let them escape.
Rape is separate matter. Hindooo men typically do "gang rape" as they will have their "toto" chopped if alone.

Ceffer says

Men need higher hand grip to keep them from squirming away in the midst of intercourse.

Yes, and just how did you acquire that higher hand grip?

DonewithDebate says

On what basis you say woman are weaker than men?

On biological basis of facts

DonewithDebate says

When women want kids they will hold men even stronger to not let them escape.

?? Since when do women rape men to get sex? All a babe has to do smile and undo a blouse button.

HeadSet says

DonewithDebate says

When women want kids they will hold men even stronger to not let them escape.

?? Since when do women rape men to get sex? All a babe has to do smile and undo a blouse button.

Not rape, But holding tight the men running away from having kids.
Need strong arms to keep them there as "woke men" are very scared of kids.

DonewithDebate says

I would say that DNA/Diet is bigger factor than gender.
Do You disagree?

Well, men and women have significantly different DNA and that accounts for the enormous and unmistakable difference in strength between the sexes.

I think I actually understated the case. From the grip strength graph below, it looks like the very strongest women are not even at the median strength for a man:

Patrick says

I've just ordered it, sounds like he knows what he's talking about!

Kurt Smithpeters

5.0 out of 5 stars comprehensive survey of the administrators, researchers, and survivors of homeless camps
Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2021
Verified Purchase
"Sanfransicko chronicles the increase of homeless persons and changing policies in San Francisco and Los Angeles since the 1970s, and similar patterns in Seattle and Portland. There is much comparative analysis and insider interviews with principle administrators of homeless related programs, homeless advocates, and a number of survivors. Contrary to good intentions, the facts indicate that huge and growing expenditure is attracting more and more people into a miserable life of violent beatings, addiction, mental illness, unsheltered concrete, and for a very large percentage death on the street.

The author interviews social workers in Netherlands and Portugal where opposite policies - contingency management, operant conditioning, and assertive case management - have eliminated what they call Open Drug Scenes (aka 'Homeless Camps' in the US) and maintain high rates of addicts staying off drugs. Both European and US experience shows that most addicts and mentally ill respond to incentives -- only the incentives are leading them down opposite paths, re-entering society vs trapped on the streets.

The book advocates a plan 'Cal-Psych' for implementing the European method.

The book goes further and explores the structures fueling this constant growth. Politically, progressive politicians and administrators are afraid to change policy because when they try they are labeled as heartless and racist by advocate groups and drummed out of office. The advocate groups are anchored by the ACLU and believe that involuntary treatment of addiction and mental illness is a violation of civil rights.

The author locates the root cause not in politics but in culture and provides a thought provoking tour of sociological and psychological thinkers and critics. He explores the mechanics of victimology/victimhood and the opposing phenomenon of agency and heroism of recovery, and the interaction of social trends such as police violence, homicide, vice, and shifting perceptions of state legitimacy. He suggests a broader trend of declining responsibility and coddling, and a still broader environment of the effect on moral foundations caused by the transition from strenuous pre industrial labor and traditional religion, to leisure and non traditional secular religion. A number of trends brought progressive voters to dominance on the west coast in recent decades and they are ultimately the enforcers of the current policy."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka_Sirhind

HunterTits says

https://patrick.net/post/1341903/2021-10-14-reading-recommendations-thread

Thanks! I remember this one now and am going to delete mine!