by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 116,975 - 117,014 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
mell says
There should be zero risk if there is a disclaimer saying answers are for informational/entertainment purposes only amd not actual legal advice.
I mean that there is a risk to you if you pay for an answer before seeing it. The answer might be crap.
And in the other direction, if you demand to see the answer before paying, the person who answered has the risk of not getting paid for a good answer.
you validate that background permits me to awnser a specifix type of quesrion
What I meant is there is no risk of "experts" suing you as long as there is a disclaimer.
mell says
What I meant is there is no risk of "experts" suing you as long as there is a disclaimer.
I'm not entirely sure of that. Need to ask a lawyer! Lol.
But the general idea of registered experts answering questions seems validated by the existence of https://go.experts-exchange.com/
Thing is, they demand a monthly subscription fee, which is bad. I think paying per answer is better.
One of my college jobs was in the HR room at Bechtel in Ann Arbor, where they had a staff of several people who would literally validate every line on every incoming resume for nuclear power plant job
Is "you" patrick.net or the person asking the question?
If it's patrick.net, I don't really know how to validate someone's resume without doing a lot of work.
"Israel's model will be followed"
"Israel's model will be followed"
So, you're going to take over the land of a marginalized ethnic group and then do a slow methodical genocide over the course of a century or two?
Whose land?
« First « Previous Comments 116,975 - 117,014 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,260,079 comments by 15,047 users - AmericanKulak, Ceffer online now