by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 75,630 - 75,669 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Seems like he's prolly ok:
http://gizmodo.com/these-cryptic-wikileaks-tweets-dont-mean-julian-assange-1787866602
To get the truth, just replace Hillary with Trump on all the news media reports. Ironman is right. The Clinton camp is so desperate, they are now reporting opposite of unbiased polls.
Get out there and hit every Hillary supporter you know that Hillary is an evil crooked corupt despot. That will slence all opposition any means neccessary. Today it's Assange tommorow it's them.
Remind them how Hitler started out, and his name started with Hi as well.
"Remind them how Hitler started out, and his name started with Hi as well."
Wow. I didn't really believe all of your Breitbart conspiracy stuff until now, but it's hard to argue with that one. Both names starting with Hi? That's no coincidence. I wonder if her parents named her Hillary as an homage to the dictator?
This was a test of your reading comprehension skills.
His name starts with "Ad"
You failed.
Wow. I didn't really believe all of your Breitbart conspiracy stuff until now, but it's hard to argue with that one. Both names starting with Hi? That's no coincidence. I wonder if her parents named her Hillary as an homage to the dictator?
I was in the North East last week, in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Delaware. Trump signs EVERYWHERE. On all the main highways, on cars, literally, everywhere. Even down here in GA, I've seen big ass billboards for Trump, and Hillary for Prison bumper stickers.
I was even in liberal havens and was only able to find one Hillary bumper sticker - taped to the inside of a backseat window of an old car.
I only know of 2-3 people - on both coasts - that would vote for her. Everyone else is all for Trump and getting rid of the hag.
Don't see how she even stands a chance.
Three recent polls of Party choice by Gallup, Fox and Pew has the electorate either even or a max of 3% apart. So, in almost every poll coming out in the last month or so, why is there always 10% to 20% more Dems surveyed in the poll versus Repubs?
I'd agree with you... But aren't there more Dem's in the population than Republicans? I'm wondering if they consistently sample it this way to represent the public?
Just wondering...
I was in the North East last week, in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Delaware. Trump signs EVERYWHERE. On all the main highways, on cars, literally, everywhere. Even down here in GA, I've seen big ass billboards for Trump, and Hillary for Prison bumper stickers.
That's illegal down here, but after the election I plan on wearing a red Make America Great Again hat everyday regardless who wins.
This movement will go into hyper drive after the election.
We have to keep Donald's feet to the coals, or we will need to beat back the foreign invaders, the Democrat party that is.
If Hillary wins, I'm starting the Crooked Party. And win every election I run in.
Historically, I believe there were more Dems, the question is, by what percentage. Here are three recent polls I saw that list party affiliation THIS year, 2016 from Fox, Pew and Gallup:
Oh cool, thanks for explaining. That does make a lot more sense now and helps validate your point.
I think there is a big shift this year as well - as in dem's registering as republicans. I saw an article the other day about 100,000 (in PA) switching parties to vote for Trump. While only 38,000 went the other way.
Liberty! Freedom! Tyranny is dead!
Run hence, proclaim, cry it about the streets.
Some to the common pulpits, and cry out
'Liberty, freedom, and enfranchisement!'
People and senators, be not affrighted;
Fly not; stand stiff: ambition's debt is paid.
Here, quite confounded with this mutiny.
Tits aren't lactating, baby looks really disappointed. It's a model with somebody else's baby.
Apparently in some circles, freedom means the freedom to kill those that disagree with you.
Note the similarity between this guy and the Taliban.
She needs to be riding Dad with her udders squirting all over him, screaming, with a riding crop. The baby needs to be jailed for child porn.
IMHO, I would say it has more to do with the age of the child. An infant doesn't have a clue about what you are doing, clearly. There's a difference between a baby napping and parents fooling around... and a baby napping and a person fooling around because the baby is turning him/her on. At what age does a child "record" what's going on? At what age would a child repeat what he/she saw? I'm writing out loud here... But if I were to draw the line, I would have to say it's when the child is old enough to record and repeat.
When you have an infant, no one would think twice about parents having sex with their door wide open. Why is the door open...? Because you want to be able to hear what's going on in the next room, right? It's not because you are trying to put on a show for the baby. It's not like you are going to stop having sex altogether because you can no longer have fort knox security. Is the person getting off because the kid is near? Of course not. Obviously, that's different if the person is getting off to the sounds coming off the baby monitor.
My kids were like eight before I could even close the door to use the bathroom. Again, not about putting on a show... It was a real need to make sure I could hear what was going on. My kids were so used to me not having an privacy, at all... that when my daughter walked in and I said to her that I could use some privacy, she said "Oh yes" and proceeded to close the door with her still inside the bathroom! Clearly mommy didn't mean privacy from her. On the good side, if you ever find yourselves in need of a tampon, you just have to yell up and even my son knows to ask which level of absorbency you require (though he only knows by color, so you have to say, "green," "yellow," or "purple.")
Maybe the dogs should fetch the tampons. They are the ones who think they are doggie treats.
Freedom of Speech should be extended to yelling "FIRE" in a theater.
Otherwise FREEDOM means nothing.
"Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin said conservatives may need to turn to physical violence in order to protect the United States against contemporary liberalism."
DAMN! How many Rep/Con /Teas receiving tax dollar support from liberal programs?
Does he want these SOCIALISTS to be killed?
Movements need to start someplace?
Would a civil war stop the distribution of milk from the govt. teat to Rep/Con/Teas?
That's nothing. I've seen it at 100,000 just on one site. Remember there are mirrors, and other sources besides the (great) Right Side Broadcasting.
Hillary brings less people to a rally than my family has on Thanksgiving.
Gee, turns out all those 'discredited' former secret service agents' claims are being backed up by FBI Documents.
PS She had temper tantrums within minutes of meeting foreign officials, and was suspected of entering the meeting totally Ferklempt and Besotten.
Tree of liberty must be refreshed...
You know the phrase Marcus, that's how these folks live under liberal oppression regime that filters faith out and promotes homosexual deviance.
Hillary heavily controls media, it's all in the leaks. Donald is one against big gov. media.
Tree of liberty must be refreshed...with the blood of queers.
Don't be so hard on yourself
Tree of liberty must be refreshed...with the blood of queers.
TRUMPFUCK's mouth does always look like it's wrapped around something when he talks.
The unholy legions of second amendment besotted redneck fools who think Trumpligula invented the Colt .45!
Trumpligula would have to use a low caliber weapon to shoot banksters, and even then, fucking the entry wound would be loose and sloppy.
If everyone simply f.ucked hoes (or sex robots in 20 years) like me, there wouldn't really be any issue in the world.
« First « Previous Comments 75,630 - 75,669 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,250,310 comments by 14,912 users - SouthMtn online now