patrick.net

Will Trump start a war

Trump will go after ISIS, but other than that nothing major.

At least his password wasn't pizz@

Remember the 2008-2012 narrative of Dems winning because they are oh-so-internet-savvy.... LOL

Hell, in 2014-2015 Hillary's narrative was that she was this highly skilled technical expert, who knew all the tricks of the Chinks and Ruskies to spy on her. Talking about meeting under a tent to prevent Chinese with telescoping cameras from taking pictures of their phone screens.

I gotta find that clip.

They need to send in an IHL skank stealth pussy bomber, and make Trumpligula pull back a puddled, boiling mass of stinky Chlamydia and yeast pus on his hand.

Heze gud peples!

http://thepigmancometh.com/2017/01/18/hollywood-liberals-to-protest-trump-inauguration-by-committing-mass-suicide/

Hollywood Liberals To Protest Trump Inauguration By Committing Mass Suicide

zzyzzx says

Hollywood Liberals To Protest Trump Inauguration By Committing Mass Suicide

I can hardly wait.

A new merchandising opportunity. Trump branded "pucker up to suck my dick, America!" MAGA lip balm.

The only reason they announced is to hide the embarassment of not being invited...

Ironman says

More than 60 Democratic lawmakers now skipping Trump’s inauguration.

"The only reason they announced is to hide the embarassment of not being invited..."

Yes, I'm sure that's it. Because the tickets are so hard to get.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/scalpers-losing-money-tickets-trump-inauguration-article-1.2947620

"Some flippers, who acquired tickets to Trump's inauguration with the intent of reselling them on the secondary market, are striking out in their efforts to peddle them and are now looking at some relatively "yuge" losses."

http://mashable.com/2017/01/17/trump-inauguration-facebook-ad/#lyULqiuHvaq3

joeyjojojunior says

there are many more. Republicans blocked a great number of bills that had strong public support. You need to listen more, I guess.

You're still talking about republicans; you are still having reading comprehension problems. I was talking about these guys (democratic inauguration boycotters) facing shit storm moving forward, if they try to behave in an obstructionist manner.

joeyjojojunior says

wtf are you talking about? I was obviously referring to Republican Congressmen

Because you were changing the subject to fit some narrative that you are trying to push. Im saying that these democratic congressmen will face shit storm for any future attempt to behave in obstructionist manner. My writing is fine, your ability to read, on other hand, sucks.

joeyjojojunior says

"Where are links that these democrats standing in solidarity behaved in obstructionist manner during obama presidency. Links or you are talking out of anus"

wtf are you talking about? I was obviously referring to Republican Congressmen who did exactly that over the last 8 years during the Obama Presidency. Why would a Dem. obstruct a Democratic President? Are you an idiot?

Did any of these democrats boycotting the inauguration ever behave in a manner supportive of obstructionist republicans, how complicated is that to understand?

MMR says

Are you an idiot?

Youre still too much of pussy to admit that you are a limousine liberal who votes for welfare to keep coloreds on their side of tracks. Of course, you lie to yourself and say that you're doing it for the 'betterment of society'.

By the way, what kind of pussy changes their handle from tatupu70 to joeyjojojunior?......pathetic.joeyjojojunior says

Why would a Dem. obstruct a Democratic President? Are you an idiot?

Why would republicans vote against trump....what kind of retard are you?

"Did any of these democrats boycotting the inauguration ever behave in a manner supportive of obstructionist republicans, how complicated is that to understand?"

It's not complicated. It's just a stupid question.

joeyjojojunior says

I think you need a writing class. Your overuse of the pronoun "they"

You're the one who has overused the pronoun "they" as I was quoting you, dumbass

joeyjojojunior says

It's not complicated. It's just a stupid question

Why is it a stupid question, same thing happened between establishment GOP and trump?

why is it so hard to comprehend that these reps are digging a ditch for themselves that will be hard to overcome. No proposal of these guys will see light of day.

joeyjojojunior says

I think you need a writing class. Your overuse of the pronoun "they" makes it impossible to determine your point.

The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills

"You're still talking about republicans; you are still having reading comprehension problems. I was talking about these guys (democratic inauguration boycotters) facing shit storm moving forward, if they try to behave in an obstructionist manner."

Of course I'm talking about Republicans. Do you really not follow the point? Republicans were in this exact situation in 2008 and were obstructionist for the next 8 years with no consequences. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

"Because you were changing the subject to fit some narrative that you are trying to push. Im saying that these democratic congressmen will face shit storm for any future attempt to behave in obstructionist manner. My writing is fine, your ability to read, on other hand, sucks."

Narrative? I'm showing you what happened in the past under almost the exactly same scenario.

"The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills"

wtf is wrong with you. I didn't change the subject. I used an example from recent history to show that Republicans, facing the same scenario, were strong obstructionists and suffered no consequences.

joeyjojojunior says

. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

I think you are discounting the social media and 'fake news' factors; trump is a master of it and these guys will most likely face more negative publicity than any other times of their respective careers

"Youre still too much of pussy to admit that you are a limousine liberal who votes for welfare to keep coloreds on their side of tracks. Of course, you lie to yourself and say that you're doing it for the 'betterment of society'."

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions.

joeyjojojunior says

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions

You think that this publicity stunt won't face retaliation and you are using past precedent to predict future events.

I'm saying you are stupid because people like you totally thought trump couldn't win.

Also, republicans did everything in their power to obstruct trump, your past precedent couldn't predict that either.

boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea"

But otherwise joeyjojo makes a lot of sense and has the comprehension skills of an einstein.

"Hey Tatty, Where's the list I asked for?? I'm STILL waiting."

If you want to find the list, try www.google.com. I don't have time to do research for you.

"boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea""

Yep--I'd say no big deal. It will be forgotten in 1 month.

"Translation: I can't back up the statements I make."

What statement would that be?

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

The King eats first. Thought we were a democracy.

joeyjojojunior says

Yep--I'd say no big deal. It will be forgotten in 1 month.

maybe the boycott will be forgotten, but every boycotter will be under increased scrutiny and hair trigger twitter and fake news attacks for everything they do counter to the Trump agenda. Stupid political move.

Still discounting the power of social media and 'fake news'. Par for the course for someone who seeks confirmation bias via MSM sources

Why do you keep posting the same fake tweet over and over? You can do better than that.

Their presence is not required

joeyjojojunior says

If you want to find the list, try www.google.com. I don't have time to do research for you.

The list was number of republicans who boycotted a democratic presidential inauguration. The number is zero, why do you have to be such a fucking pussy?

Ironman says

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasted in early 2016 that America will never see 3.0% economic growth again.

CBO non-partisan, but what if the US is a matured economy like Europe before. We might be able to get some short term gains, but can't say for sure if those gains would be sustainable.

"The list was number of republicans who boycotted a democratic presidential inauguration. The number is zero, why do you have to be such a fucking pussy?"

How is that being a pussy exactly? Why is it my job to do Ironman's research? I have no idea if a Republican has ever not attended a Democratic inauguration. I'd be surprised if it's never happened in the history of the US, but you could be right.

"maybe the boycott will be forgotten, but every boycotter will be under increased scrutiny and hair trigger twitter and fake news attacks for everything they do counter to the Trump agenda. Stupid political move.

Still discounting the power of social media and 'fake news'. Par for the course for someone who seeks confirmation bias via MSM sources"

You presume that being against the Trump agenda will hurt these candidates in their election. Which is a bad assumption. I bet if you look, Trump lost badly in pretty much all of the non-attendee's districts. Supporting Trump would hurt them a lot more in a primary--which is what they are more worried about.

I understand some dumb fucking Democrat presidents are going to attend.
FUCK ALL DEMOCRAT VOTERS.
How many Republican presidents have attended Democrat Inaugurations?

Go ahead ! Tell me it's not a big club.
I'm not dumb enough to believe you.

Did you find which statement I supposedly can't back up yet?

joeyjojojunior says

I bet if you look, Trump lost badly in pretty much all of the non-attendee's districts. Supporting Trump would hurt them a lot more in a primary--which is what they are more worried about.

Which is why they feel emboldened to boycott the inauguration. Lot of those districts consist of the LCDs of the democratic vote bank. I think having a lot of negative publicity thrust upon them for such a transgression will come back to bite them in ass, because unlike the last 8 years, no one was using twitter and social media like trump did in his relatively cost-effective campaign.

Kind of surprised that the democrats didn't think of it first, since they are the party that tends to be more tech-savvy, at least when compared to older, stodgy establishment republicans.

joeyjojojunior says

How is that being a pussy exactly? Why is it my job to do Ironman's research? I have no idea if a Republican has ever not attended a Democratic inauguration. I'd be surprised if it's never happened in the history of the US, but you could be right.

Because you know the answer is zero and you are not even remotely willing to concede the point. But again, if you're willing to provide a link that is contrary, I would certainly read it and consider it.