patrick.net

joeyjojojunior says

It's not complicated. It's just a stupid question

Why is it a stupid question, same thing happened between establishment GOP and trump?

why is it so hard to comprehend that these reps are digging a ditch for themselves that will be hard to overcome. No proposal of these guys will see light of day.

joeyjojojunior says

I think you need a writing class. Your overuse of the pronoun "they" makes it impossible to determine your point.

The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills

"You're still talking about republicans; you are still having reading comprehension problems. I was talking about these guys (democratic inauguration boycotters) facing shit storm moving forward, if they try to behave in an obstructionist manner."

Of course I'm talking about Republicans. Do you really not follow the point? Republicans were in this exact situation in 2008 and were obstructionist for the next 8 years with no consequences. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

"Because you were changing the subject to fit some narrative that you are trying to push. Im saying that these democratic congressmen will face shit storm for any future attempt to behave in obstructionist manner. My writing is fine, your ability to read, on other hand, sucks."

Narrative? I'm showing you what happened in the past under almost the exactly same scenario.

"The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills"

wtf is wrong with you. I didn't change the subject. I used an example from recent history to show that Republicans, facing the same scenario, were strong obstructionists and suffered no consequences.

joeyjojojunior says

. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

I think you are discounting the social media and 'fake news' factors; trump is a master of it and these guys will most likely face more negative publicity than any other times of their respective careers

"Youre still too much of pussy to admit that you are a limousine liberal who votes for welfare to keep coloreds on their side of tracks. Of course, you lie to yourself and say that you're doing it for the 'betterment of society'."

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions.

joeyjojojunior says

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions

You think that this publicity stunt won't face retaliation and you are using past precedent to predict future events.

I'm saying you are stupid because people like you totally thought trump couldn't win.

Also, republicans did everything in their power to obstruct trump, your past precedent couldn't predict that either.

boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea"

But otherwise joeyjojo makes a lot of sense and has the comprehension skills of an einstein.

"Hey Tatty, Where's the list I asked for?? I'm STILL waiting."

If you want to find the list, try www.google.com. I don't have time to do research for you.

"boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea""

Yep--I'd say no big deal. It will be forgotten in 1 month.

"Translation: I can't back up the statements I make."

What statement would that be?

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

The King eats first. Thought we were a democracy.

joeyjojojunior says

Yep--I'd say no big deal. It will be forgotten in 1 month.

maybe the boycott will be forgotten, but every boycotter will be under increased scrutiny and hair trigger twitter and fake news attacks for everything they do counter to the Trump agenda. Stupid political move.

Still discounting the power of social media and 'fake news'. Par for the course for someone who seeks confirmation bias via MSM sources

Why do you keep posting the same fake tweet over and over? You can do better than that.

Their presence is not required

joeyjojojunior says

If you want to find the list, try www.google.com. I don't have time to do research for you.

The list was number of republicans who boycotted a democratic presidential inauguration. The number is zero, why do you have to be such a fucking pussy?

Ironman says

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasted in early 2016 that America will never see 3.0% economic growth again.

CBO non-partisan, but what if the US is a matured economy like Europe before. We might be able to get some short term gains, but can't say for sure if those gains would be sustainable.

"The list was number of republicans who boycotted a democratic presidential inauguration. The number is zero, why do you have to be such a fucking pussy?"

How is that being a pussy exactly? Why is it my job to do Ironman's research? I have no idea if a Republican has ever not attended a Democratic inauguration. I'd be surprised if it's never happened in the history of the US, but you could be right.

"maybe the boycott will be forgotten, but every boycotter will be under increased scrutiny and hair trigger twitter and fake news attacks for everything they do counter to the Trump agenda. Stupid political move.

Still discounting the power of social media and 'fake news'. Par for the course for someone who seeks confirmation bias via MSM sources"

You presume that being against the Trump agenda will hurt these candidates in their election. Which is a bad assumption. I bet if you look, Trump lost badly in pretty much all of the non-attendee's districts. Supporting Trump would hurt them a lot more in a primary--which is what they are more worried about.

I understand some dumb fucking Democrat presidents are going to attend.
FUCK ALL DEMOCRAT VOTERS.
How many Republican presidents have attended Democrat Inaugurations?

Go ahead ! Tell me it's not a big club.
I'm not dumb enough to believe you.

Did you find which statement I supposedly can't back up yet?

joeyjojojunior says

I bet if you look, Trump lost badly in pretty much all of the non-attendee's districts. Supporting Trump would hurt them a lot more in a primary--which is what they are more worried about.

Which is why they feel emboldened to boycott the inauguration. Lot of those districts consist of the LCDs of the democratic vote bank. I think having a lot of negative publicity thrust upon them for such a transgression will come back to bite them in ass, because unlike the last 8 years, no one was using twitter and social media like trump did in his relatively cost-effective campaign.

Kind of surprised that the democrats didn't think of it first, since they are the party that tends to be more tech-savvy, at least when compared to older, stodgy establishment republicans.

joeyjojojunior says

How is that being a pussy exactly? Why is it my job to do Ironman's research? I have no idea if a Republican has ever not attended a Democratic inauguration. I'd be surprised if it's never happened in the history of the US, but you could be right.

Because you know the answer is zero and you are not even remotely willing to concede the point. But again, if you're willing to provide a link that is contrary, I would certainly read it and consider it.

Where's Hoover - the other guy who dealt with a depressionary market crash?

This site has very different numbers for real GDP:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/238600/gdp-per-capita-growth-by-us-president-from-hoover-to-obama/

OLD NEWS!
I already knew DEMOCRATS SUCK!
Lewis Black: "Democrats are the party of no ideas."
They do have one idea.
Let's march protest,carry signs,placards,banners that say
"Hooray for our side." (That what the Republicans say,too).
I got interviewed on TV. Did You see me? Did you see me?
Look! Look! I've got it on video. Ain't I great?

Watch Ds & Rs when they gather to make an announcement.
There will be a large group of their ilk standing behind the speaker.
Each one thinking, We're the Greatest!

What's sad is that the retard ,slime voters keep electing these
DECEIVERS.

Ironman says

Reading comprehension issues again?

The fact that Hoover is included towards the end of your lackluster post and is specifically omitted from the graph says something about the bias in gateway pundit's head and the confirmation bias you are exhibiting by reposting such stories all day long. See ya tomorrow rust bucket.

Ironman says

Because that's NOT GDP, but GDP per capita.

That explains it I did see that the #s in your graph are listed elsewhere from neutral sources, so I believe them. The per capita GDP is more representative of what is achievable, so it is a much better measure of what is happening with the health of the economy.

Making fun of stupid,over & over is Patnet rule # 8.
Especially when it's funny.

Sounds like an Irish Spring advertisement, especially since most gnarly, unshaven mounds will give you road rash after a brief gnoshing.

That's what I figured. Ironman busted again.

A president has dick to do with the economy. He's a cog in a much bigger machine. You want to blame someone for poor growth, start with the ones who's hands are on the printing presses.

Now if you want to blame Obama for being a welfare junky, spending our tax dollars on endless vacations, you have my full support. Why a welfare junky you ask? Because welfare junky don't do shit, just sit around spending our money.

But I thought only Russia was attaching ISIS?

"I have a drone."

- Barack Obama

joeyjojojunior says

But I thought only Russia was attaching ISIS?

I thought ISIS didn't have open bases in Libya - until Hitlary got rid of Ghaddafyi.

Why is Ironman posting staged photos insinuating that America is purposefully droning innocent wedding parties? This is the kind of shit you would see on ISIS jihadi websites. Are you really that bummed that America is targeting ISIS training camps that you would ape ISIS propaganda with a doctored photo?

I am quite certain when Trump ramps up bombing attacks in the coming months, Ironman will be a big fan.

Another good merchandising opportunity: Trump branded pussy grabbing handhold chalk in multiple flavors.

"Don't let that pussy slip away without a good grab!"

" 4. Obama is enormously flawed, and when it comes to his drone assassination program, a war criminal."
FUCK Obama & Democrats!

"The body count for the Second US-Iraq was up to 1,033,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, about 110,000 Iraqi combat deaths, about 6,800 American military deaths, about 1,500 other coalition deaths, plus mercenary deaths."
Another LYING war criminal!

We need to destroy Libya!
That where Saddam's WMD are hidden.
DOUBLE FUCK you republican voters!
I thought the number was around 4500, 6800 makes g.w.bush a god to Dumb Ass Republicans.
FMTT.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/6/15/1307252/-GW-Bush-s-Iraq-War-vs-Obama-s-Iraq-War

Ironman says

U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said the camps housed ISIS fighters, many of whom had escaped the group's former stronghold in Sirte, on Libya's central coast. He added that officials are still working to assess the impact of the strikes, but they believe more than 80 ISIS fighters were killed.

Thank You Obama, that was not bad for a day's work. Trump will do better.

Ironman says

These cold blooded criminals are now walking the streets. I need a gun.