0
0

I don't even know what to think.


 invite response                
2006 Apr 11, 4:31pm   15,921 views  175 comments

by surfer-x   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Bubble Conspiracists Unite!

Ok, so a friend I've know since grade school forwarded me this jibber jabber bull$hit email. At first read it is just pure crap, but as I read on I realized that this embodies current Amerika; I believe this thinking to be the origins of the real estate bubble.

We deserve it. It being many things. We as Amerikans deserve cheap gas, big massive asses and cars, and the ability to borrow Chuck, borrow.

Let it rip.

Trolls need not apply.

Copyright Surfer-X
All rights reserved, all wrongs denied.

"GAS WAR - an idea that WILL work

This was originally sent by a retired Coca Cola executive It came from one of his engineer buddies who retired from Halliburton. It's worth your consideration.

Join the resistance!!!! I hear we are going to hit close to $ 4.00 a gallon by next summer and it might go higher!! Want gasoline prices to come down? We need to take some intelligent, united action. Phillip Hollsworth offered this good idea. This makes MUCH MORE SENSE than the "don't buy gas on a certain day" campaign that was going around last April or May!

The oil companies just laughed at that because they knew we wouldn't continue to "hurt" ourselves by refusing to buy gas. It was more of an inconvenience to us than it was a problem for them. BUT, whoever thought of this idea, has come up with a plan that can really work. Please read on and join with us!

By now you're probably thinking gasoline priced at about $1.50 is super cheap. Me too! It is currently $2.79 for regular unleaded in my town. Now that the oil companies and the OPEC nations have conditioned us to think that the cost of a gallon of gas is CHEAP at $1.50 - $1.75, we need to take aggressive action to teach them that BUYERS control the marketplace..not sellers With the price of gasoline going up more each day, we consumers need to take action. The only way we are going to see the price of gas come down is if we hit someone in the pocketbook by not purchasing their gas! And, we can do that WITHOUT hurting ourselves.

How?

Since we all rely on our cars, we can't just stop buying gas. But we CAN have an impact on gas prices if we all act together to force a price war.

Here's the idea: For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY gasoline from the two biggest companies (which now are one), EXXON and MOBIL. If they are not selling any gas, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. If they reduce their prices, the other companies will have to follow suit. But to have an impact, we need to reach literally millions of Exxon and Mobil gas buyers. It's really simple to do! Now, don't wimp out on me at this point...keep reading and I'll explain how simple it is to reach millions of people!!

I am sending this note to 30 people. If each of us send it to at least ten more (30 x 10 = 300) ... and those 300 send it to at least ten more (300 x 10 = 3,000)..and so on, by the time the message reaches the sixth group of people, we will have reached over THREE MILLION consumers. If those three million get excited and pass this on to ten friends each, then 30 million people will have been contacted! If it goes one level further, you guessed it..... THREE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE!!!

Again, all you have to do is send this to 10 people. That's all! (If you don't understand how we can reach 300 million and all you have to do is send this to 10 people.... Well, let's face it, you just aren't a mathematician. But I am . so trust me on this one.) :-)

How long would all that take? If each of us sends this e-mail out to ten more people within one day of receipt, all 300 MILLION people could conceivably be contacted within the next 8 days!!! I'll bet you didn't think you and I had that much potential, did you! Acting together we can make a difference.

If this makes sense to you, please pass this message on. I suggest that we not buy from EXXON/MOBIL UNTIL THEY LOWER THEIR PRICES TO THE $1.30 RANGE AND KEEP THEM DOWN. THIS CAN REALLY WORK"

#housing

« First        Comments 153 - 175 of 175        Search these comments

153   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 7:54am  

The new SUVs have backup cameras that show what is behind you on the GPS screen.

This is a good feature. GPS should become standard.

154   Randy H   2006 Apr 12, 7:59am  

Randy H & Peter P do NOT = typical American debtor

I'm the sort that gets more excited about a good arbitrage opportunity than the superbowl. That isn't typical?

155   HARM   2006 Apr 12, 8:06am  

I’m the sort that gets more excited about a good arbitrage opportunity than the superbowl. That isn’t typical?

Umm... suuuure. :roll:

156   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 8:07am  

Two points regarding debt:

1. Never use long-term debt to facilitate short-term consumption
2. Understand the risks involved in leveraged investments

157   Randy H   2006 Apr 12, 8:15am  

1. Never use long-term debt to facilitate short-term consumption

It's just a real good idea to try to match durations wherever possible. Don't get a 5 year loan on a car you'll want to sell in 3 years, etc. If you need to to afford it, you can't.

This raises an interesting issue that has come up as I've been scenario-stress testing "the Bubblizer". I believe I've quantitatively (re)proven the credit-bubble cause for rising house prices. (I say that sarcastically...I should have known better).

I can demonstrate that, because of tax benefits (both interest deduction and no cap gains), you are better off as a home debtor paying off minimal principal, owning minimal equity, and staying in your house for the fewest number of years. What!?! That is crazy talk, you say.

Well, the problem is that there is no priced-in risk adjustment for "what about if/when the music stops?" I tried to do this in the last version, but it's tough to do without Fewlesh-style (Fewlesh is an uber-quant semi-regular poster here) full simulation. In my model, you still are always better using crappy financing because taxes favor you being irresponsible.

I'm going to uninstall Excel.

158   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 8:19am  

It’s just a real good idea to try to match durations wherever possible. Don’t get a 5 year loan on a car you’ll want to sell in 3 years, etc. If you need to to afford it, you can’t.

I agree.

159   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 8:22am  

I’m going to uninstall Excel.

Well, I am the kind of person who will optimize a model until it is useless.

160   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 9:13am  

"I’m the sort that gets more excited about a good arbitrage opportunity than the superbowl. That isn’t typical?"

Of course that's typical, most Americans find football boring, obscure and incomprehensible.

161   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 9:20am  

I'd say a person have to take on some debt (in the form of low fixed interest rates and good 0% balance transfer deals) to stay ahead in this so called low inflation economy. The borrowed amount gives me some liquidity to play with if things get ugly.

162   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 9:36am  

If you are externally motivated, you may just as well take on more financial obligations or you may get stuck in complacency.

Not financial advice

163   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 9:40am  

Consumer credit is still incredibly easy to get and very very cheap. From my fairly unsophisticated perspective, that is the big arbitrage opportunity.

Unfortunately for the economy, tons of specuvestors knows too, without ever learning the definition of arbitrage.

(not financial advice)

165   Peter P   2006 Apr 12, 10:25am  

coming out of Calistoga and going onto the Petrified Forest Road my GPS shows me driving through the trees for about 1/2 mile

GPS cannot obtain a good signal in the forest.

You will discover more glitch. Mine shows that I am on a frontage road when I am on the freeway from time to time.

166   OO   2006 Apr 12, 10:35am  

Duration match is an old technique at banks before the popularization of derivatives, my first summer job was to sit at a Japanese bank's treasury dept of a local regional operation tallying all commercial loans and sorting them by duration, of course that was almost 20 years ago.

Nowadays, I heard no more commercial banks do that, you can always derivitatize or securitize the hell out of your loan portfolio.

167   HARM   2006 Apr 12, 10:37am  

@o.t.,

No way one oddball sale is going to make a difference and know way you'd ever talk anyone else into buying into this idea. The market will correct of its own accord, so there's no reason to worry about it.

Personally, if I lived in a bubble area, I'd sell it pronto before values come down any further. I'd sell it for market price and feel *no guilt whatsoever*. The specuvestor a$$holes who drove prices through the roof on me & millions of other working class people felt ZERO guilt about maximizing their return, so why should I?

168   OO   2006 Apr 12, 10:39am  

I am a bit surprised that no one has ventured to securitize student loans. Ivy Leauge student loans bundled with AA rating, UC system A...Then of course 10 years down the road, we have enough statistics to tell if the Ivy graduates are living up to their reputation, at least in the loan-repayment aspect.

169   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 10:40am  

o.t.,

Nah, you're just risk adversed. However, be careful about holding bonds because while you're almost certainly assured of a nominal dollar yield, that amount may be less valuable due to inflation.

I wouldn't sell below market clearing price to pop the bubble. But if I was owning in this bubble, I would sell a little below current market clearing price just so I'd sell to realize a tidy sum from the sale that I can take to the bank. The security of knowing I won't be stuck in a down market makes me a little less greedy about asking price.

Given the big number of houses on the market and their ever lengthening DOM, I think a lot of current RE sellers are thinking just the same thing as I am in this hypothetical.

170   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 10:46am  

Owneroccupier,

I doubt it. UC students would have lower loan amounts. They're also more likely to have a low key life style. I think that would make UC students a better bet than the Ivies.

Student loans are not dischargeable in bankruptcy anyways, so the only way they wouldn't be paid is if someone becomes severely disabled or dead before the loan is up. That's a pretty good risk profile, unless a particular school is full of Sylvia Plaths.

171   OO   2006 Apr 12, 11:01am  

astrid,

OK, I buy your arguement. See, one more revenue stream for the ibanking industry. I was half joking there.

However, I do have an idea for securitization, and I hope someone will do it. Lots of international students come to this country to do law school and business school, in the hope of getting into high paid jobs and staying here permanently. Now, some of them will succeed, some will not. In any case, they usually have a problem accessing the traditional student loan pool, for example, only international students admitted to top business schools can get financing from a commerical bank, those who are shunned from the top schools can get no financing here. I understand perfectly why the commercial banks deny them loan access, because those who graduate from mediocre professional schools with hefty student loans are more likely to default, if they cannot find a job in the US and have to go back to their native country where the pay is significantly lower.

However, if one can pass on that risk back to, say, international investors, there is money to be made in that bucket for international student school loan. As long as these student loans can be packaged up and sold to a third party, preferably overseas, who cares if they can pay back or not.

However, the MBS shit that may blow up any time seriously dampen the possibility that such a securitized loan can be launched into the market.

172   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 11:17am  

Owneroccupier,

That is an interesting idea. It would be a valuable service for highly able international students without deep family backing. As you pointed out, this is primarily a problem for professional schools. I can see some value on such contracts. Essentially, an investor is betting that a large enough proportion of them become successful and stay in America, to pay them the principle and a good return...there might be a moral hazard there to encourage more students to go home rather than tough it out in America, but it is an interesting idea.

I fear too MBS and MBS equivalents will soon be a ugly word on Wall St. This is quite unfortunate, since these securitized loans can be highly valuable tool in the right hands.

Funny, as I was writing the earlier reply to your first post, I was thinking about how colleges and universities essentially accept candidates as calculated gambles. Starving poets = $ 0, Bill Gates = $1 Billion. Pool them together and you have an endownment. That's actually not so different from what you're proposing, except the potential generosity of an appreciative and wealthy alumni is potentially limitless.

173   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 11:42am  

grrrr, I posted twice. Surfer X or anyone else with editing powers, please erase one of the duplicated and also this post.

174   astrid   2006 Apr 12, 11:44am  

o.t.,

Yeah, it feels like we're standing on quiksand, doesn't it?

175   Different Sean   2006 Apr 12, 4:11pm  

Bill Gates = $1 Billion

except bill gates dropped out of college in 1st year in order to exploit the whole PC thing...

however, he single-handedly makes huge endowments to oxford/cambridge and where ever else, now has a knighthood from the queen, and several hundred honorary doctorates, probably...

not bad for an early college drop-out...

i did a computing/electronics degree, and i'd be struggling to start my own lawn-mowing business, let alone do a gatesy...

« First        Comments 153 - 175 of 175        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions