« First « Previous Comments 68 - 72 of 72 Search these comments
A consumption tax extracts taxes from each person in proportion to the affluence of the lifestyle they enjoy. Last time I checked, the rich were buying and consuming far more than the poor. So how is it that a consumption tax is regressive?
BTW, while a consumption tax would be better for the economy (encourages savings and investment), a change to such a tax would be worse for anyone who has been saving money for the future. They have already been taxed on that money as income, and would then be taxed again when the money is spent.
The good feature in Prop 13 was putting a cap on the tax rate. Government spending was ballooning out of control and people were literally being taxed out of their homes at the time that prop 13 was passed. It put an end to those unbridled tax increases.
The bad feature was putting a cap on the assessed value. This cap on value (subject to 2% inflation) is what has long-time owners paying ridiculously low taxes compared to new owners. This is not equitable, and it leaves local governments underfunded.
Like many extreme problems, this one was overcorrected by prop 13.
It should be noted that prior to prop 13 the taxes were also not equitably distributed as well. This was because the assessment process was a combination of random assessments and rotational assements. Your home could get reassessed while your neighbors stayed at a lower assessment. So uneven taxation existed in the pre-prop 13 world.
To be equitable, assessments should be done on all homes in the same year, so that everyone is assessed under the same market conditions and relative value levels. Many communities do it precisely this way.
Surfer-X:
I am pretty sure that Larry Stone will lower the property tax as the value declines. Check out this article from 2003: http://tinyurl.com/fzc9x
Property values dropped a few years ago and it was hardly noticed. I was just like most of you renters for over 13 years here in BA. My income finally rose to the point where I could afford a traditional 30-yr fixed with 10% down. I'm in it for the long haul. It is not without risk, but I got what I wanted and I'm not hurting. This whole blog just shows me that there is still plenty of pent up demand in RE. You have to accept that our parents struggled to buy a house. It isn't easy. The current market is out of control, but it won't go down as much as many here hope.
« First « Previous Comments 68 - 72 of 72 Search these comments
Suggested by Jimbo.