0
0

Lex on US Housing Market


 invite response                
2006 May 24, 2:59am   15,844 views  186 comments

by Randy H   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Homebuilders
Readers of the FT will be familiar with the (newly expanded) Lex Column. Today's featured an interesting little bit on US housebuilders, and its relation to the US housing market.

Feeling sorry for the builders does not come naturally to most homeowners. But as US households worry about the value of their dwellings, they might spare a thought for those even less fortunate. Since July last year, shares in US homebuilders have lost over a third of their value.

Things have been most painful at the top end of the market. Shares in Toll Brothers, the luxury homebuilder, have more than halved. Over the past few months, the question for most investors has changed from whether there will be a slowdown, to how bad things could possibly get.

The column goes on to mention:

  • Signs of significant inventory overhang in many regions
  • Speculative buyers trying to unload holdings
  • Owners hoping to upgrade increasingly finding they cannot sell their old homes for the prices they need/expect.
  • Nonetheless, builders have not significantly slowed new building efforts

Toll is considered a bellwether indicator. Why? Because it markets upscale homes to a sophisticated clientele. Sentiment has grown so negative on Toll that their recent guidance further cutting earnings forecasts actually triggered a relief rally. The market capitalization of Toll is less than the value of all its land and inventory.

Or is it? The problem is that the only potential buyers for construction projects in-progress are other builders, who are similarly depressed for the same reasons. This kind of "vicious circle" is hard to break and usually causes an overshooting of reasonable valuation.

But before you jump in to buy undervalued REITs or homebuilder stocks, keep in mind that this may just be the beginning. The entire sector is trading at about 5.5 times ever shrinking earnings estimates. But (and this is a big but), direct costs are skyrocketing, general inflation is increasing, rates are rising, and industry consolidation is probably nowhere near done. Lex's conclusion: it will be increasingly difficult for these builders to defend returns as capital costs soar. Result, more downside probably left.

Why on earth do we even care? We're sure to hear from at least one Troll that "New Home Starts" don't matter, or that homebuilders aren't relevant, or that "sales of existing homes" is the only game in town. My answer: perhaps, this time, everything is different and we've entered a great new economic paradigm where leading indicators no longer lead. Or, the correction is well underway.

--Randy H

#housing

« First        Comments 176 - 186 of 186        Search these comments

176   Peter P   2006 May 24, 11:27am  

I don’t like In and Out french fries, so I guess I lose credibility with you.

Huh? I do not like their french fries either.

I much rather have a Fillet-O-Fish.

177   OO   2006 May 24, 11:33am  

Peter P,

you're not alone, I also prefer Fillet-O-Fish to In and Out.

178   Peter P   2006 May 24, 11:37am  

I prefer McDonald’s french fries.

Same here. But I do not eat much fries.

you’re not alone, I also prefer Fillet-O-Fish to In and Out.

That is what I usually eat there after breakfast time.

179   OO   2006 May 24, 11:45am  

How does McDonald's decide the price of their burgers? I used to head down LA by driving, and the closer you are to urban center, the cheaper the burger price becomes. If you are stuck in some main stop center along I-5, they charge you an arm and a leg for the same thing.

For example, Chicken burger (or whatever burger with chicken patty in it) costs 89-99 cents when you leave San Jose, it soars to 1.29 in San Luis Obispo, and reaches the height of around 1.59 an hour north of Bakersfield.

180   Joe Schmoe   2006 May 24, 11:56am  

It's funny, the McDonald's accross from the (former) World Trade Center in NY charged close to $8.00 for a Crispy Chicken Sandwhich Value Meal in the mid-90's. The very same meal in Chicago's financial district was $4.85.

I guess they charge whatever the market will bear.

181   Peter P   2006 May 24, 12:37pm  

You guys are so funny. You’re talking about french fries?!?!

I mean Freedom Fries. :)

182   Peter P   2006 May 24, 12:37pm  

New thread: The Perfect House

183   Peter P   2006 May 24, 12:40pm  

Apple Pie Rocks … (Twice)

I am hungry. ;)

184   Randy H   2006 May 24, 1:21pm  

Joe Schmoe,

In Chicago McD's had to compete with Billy Goat's.

185   astrid   2006 May 24, 1:55pm  

I prefer all in-n-out offerings to all McD offerings (Yes, even over the precisely engineered McD fries. In-n-out fries taste more authenic because they're fresh.

However, I'm still going against that Newport Beach McMansion. No $5M estate should be placed that close to the street. It looks like a monstrous McMansion...kind of a funny concept, a McMansion mansion.

186   HARM   2006 May 24, 3:53pm  

Great tips, Bap33 - thanks!

« First        Comments 176 - 186 of 186        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions