patrick.net

Ok, Randy,

Glad there are no hard feelings --sorry, if I got a tad personal.

I see your point on the game theory/foreign currency manipulation angle. We can all agree that the increasing politicization of monetary policy, science, etc. is a bad thing for society overall, and us plebians in particular. How to go about de-politicizing it is another question.

How to go about de-politicizing it is another question.

Or, more importantly, how to exploit the situation when we know that nothing can be done.

HARM,

How to go about de-politicizing it is another question.

That's easy: space colonization. The only politics of the new-world colonies for at least the first couple hundred years would be ridding themselves of Earth's unfair taxation without representation.

Of course, all of this could end up moot. If energy prices keep rising and urban communities keep flourishing, then eventually this suburban sprawl will stop as people can’t afford the commute. Will it take $10 gas? Maybe. Of course, all bets are off if some replacement comes along and makes travel cheap. I think at that point, the inevitable suburban expansion will continue. Well, unless population starts to drop. I think the US is near joining the list of nations where each woman has less than 2 children.

Exactly. There are so many exogenous forces constantly at work on influencing consumer choice and individual priorities, there's no way to precisely predict what people will choose tomorrow. This is also why central planning will never completely replace open markets as a more efficient resource allocation mechanism. Too many unknown interrelated variables, too many complicated feedback loops, too much change.

>>We can all agree that the increasing politicization of monetary policy, science, etc. is a bad thing for society overall, and us plebians in particular.

I agree with everything but the word "increasing." Are you sure it's increasing? I can't tell that from reading accounts of previous eras.

@Michael Anderson,

Point taken. Well, I haven't been alive (or at least as an adult tuned into housing/politics/finance) long enough to qualify as an "expert", but my relatively short span, I've observed subjects that used to be (somewhat) sheilded from the election cycle becoming MUCH more politicized --especially in the last 15 years. Of course, this is merely my subjective opinion, but... remember Paul Volcker? The guy who raised the Fed funds rate above 18% in the early '80s and triggered the worst recession since the Great Depression. And did it to break the back of out-of-control inflation.

Can you imagine the current fed chief doing that today?

I can also recall a time when the CPI reflected something close to "true" inflation. Before the magical "improvements" of hedonics, substitution and plain-old leaving shit out. Oh well...

Can't just blame the Repugnican pols, either (though they do happen to be in charge of all 3 branches of government at the moment). Those big, wonderful speculative-inducing tax breaks occurred under Clinton's watch. Ditto for starting the trend of blatantly gaming the CPI and blowing asset bubbles. Plus, I see the level of shrillness rising on both sides, to the detriment of useful discourse.

Btw, I'm sure you've all seen this by now, but Bernanke pussied out and raised FFR a paltry .25%. And indicated they are probably done raising them:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/monetary/2006/20060629/default.htm

Should still be enough to help break the HB's back, though more slowly than we would have liked.

I remember a time when political wars were waged in the Middle. That was the way Reagan got elected by landslides. Political battles are now waged on the margins, not in the middle. We now distill everything, from social issues to economic issues to military issues to simple, black and white, you're either with us or them choices. Such choices are deceptively satisfying, but generally fail to address the real root of the issues. Such politics disillusions the majority in the middle who simply tune out, turn on reality TV, and ignore it all as long as they can. It's not as simple as sheeple morons wasting time watching American Idol. A lot of it is that American Idol is immeasurably more pleasurable to many folk than watching/listening to engineered personalities scream over one another in crude, staged, demonization fest, non-debates.

>>but… remember Paul Volcker?

Well, that's a good point. But I like to look at that as one guy just being incredibly great.

I always thought that the most political time for these jobs was 1940-1980 when Democrats were so powerful they held an iron grip. But I guess because they were so dominant, it was all just understood. Maybe the shrillness comes from some level of parity.

>>Such choices are deceptively satisfying, but generally fail to address the real root of the issues.

That's true. And nothing really gets solved so these battles become touchstones.

The only thing about American Idol that appeals to me is that it's the first public entertainment in decades that reaches across the generations. Everything else is so niche focused that a grandma doesn't know what a granddaughter is talking about.

American idol is stupid rehash of Star Search.

We should have American Chef instead.

We should have American Chef instead.

First contestant: Peter P
food theme: toro

I am actually on topic this time !

Interesting little article on Fed :
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/columnists/14924782.htm

The author is quite optimistic about BB being the man. They actually did omit the line today "further policy blah blah may be needed" etc. Stock markets took that as a sign of a pause that will happen very very soon.

Given the language, that might very well be true. I am not as confident about BB as the author of this editorial. There is too much political pressure to pause.

If the Fed does pause, I would not be so confident about crash/correction. The long term and mortgage rates show no sign of correcting. They are higher than a year ago, but still historically very low. And apart from increasing rates, I don't see what can cause this bubble to burst quickly.

There will be high inventory, low sales, no appreciation or even a small decrease in prices which remain flat for decades. But 10-15% drop does not help me.

First contestant: Peter P
food theme: toro

How about..

Fresh Toro Tartar
White truffle oil, quail egg, chives, white pepper

And apart from increasing rates, I don’t see what can cause this bubble to burst quickly.

There will be high inventory, low sales, no appreciation or even a small decrease in prices which remain flat for decades. But 10-15% drop does not help me.

I for one have never predicted a sharp or fast decline (you can scan the archives for my posts/predictions from a year ago and see this is true), though I highly doubt FBs can hold onto their negative cash-flow properties for "decades". I always expected the Fed would stop short of doing what was necessary to really "pop" this thing in a big way, as they have become little more than cheap political hacks, seeking to please/ensure re-election for the current crop of lying shitbags who appoint & confirm them.

This does not mean the bubble cannot/will not deflate, however. Though, yes, it will probably be slow & very sticky on the way down. The last one took some 6-7 years from peak to trough (using either sales or median price as a barometer) and I see no reason to be certain it will proceed more quickly this time around. Recall there are two ways for prices and rents/incomes to "revert to the mean": (1) prices holding relatively flat while inflation raises the price of everything else + wages, (2) nominal price cuts.

The correction/pop will most likely come as a combination of both (as it also did last time). We are already seeing nominal price drops in many CA locations (see recent CAR/Dataquick numbers). And we are at the very beginning of the down cycle. Have patience.

And why did the Japanese leader with the cool hairdo seem way smarter than Bush today?

they always do... why isn't the leadership of the free world subject to the rules of merit like everywhere else?

substitute any other govt as required:

And why did the ________ leader with the ________ seem way smarter than Bush today?

Why does he seem smarter than Bush? ... Because he is smarter than Bush.

Just to give you a nice graphical representation about just HOW dependent the economy is on MEW right now, here's a lovely chart from Calculated Risk:

MEW = Mortgage Equity Withdrawal: cash-out refinancing, HELOCs, etc.

Oh, and this doesn't even take into account the impact on HH incomes/employment when RE-related employment falls off a cliff. Remember, approx. 40% of all jobs created in the last 5 years have been RE related.

Randy says:
Half the time I hear “let the market decide” the commentor probably couldn’t even define the relevant market and explain the mechanism by which it “decides”, let alone tell me “what’s wrong or right with letting it decide”. Invoking free-market doctrine when convenient is nothing more than ideology, and does a disservice to those who truly favor free market solutions.

didn't you know? markets are benign, super-intelligent organisms that always produce the best result for everybody involved and for the environment.

'Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.'
John Maynard Keynes

more keynesian quotes:

The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods.

Successful investing is anticipating the anticipations of others.

Americans are apt to be unduly interested in discovering what average opinion believes average opinion to be.

Education: the inculcation of the incomprehensible into the indifferent by the incompetent.

For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to every one that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not. Avarice and usury and precaution must be our gods for a little longer still.

I work for a Government I despise for ends I think criminal.

Like Odysseus, the President looked wiser when he was seated.

Most men love money and security more, and creation and construction less, as they get older.

The day is not far off when the economic problem will take the back seat where it belongs, and the arena of the heart and the head will be occupied or reoccupied, by our real problems - the problems of life and of human relations, of creation and behavior and religion.

In the long run, we're all dead.

RIP JK Galbraith, by the way (that's me, not keynes)

‘Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.’

No doubt JMK said that with great irony, while more or less agreeing with the basic premise. Sort of similar to this one:

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
--Sir Winston Churchill

Throw that in with greed. We have become a nation of greedy, ego-centric, selfish jerks. How did we get here?

hmmm, you split off from the noble, moderating influence of great britain...

Water vapor is some 70% of the atmospheric greehose gases but it wouldn’t do to drain the Chinese rice paddies or pull the plug on their hydro projects now would it?

surely there is a lot more water vapour coming off the earth's oceans than the rice paddies.

methane is more destructive than CO2, but less of it is produced.

which glaciers are growing?

Peter P Says:
Glad I didn’t do any shorting. The market roaring today.

Something does not smell right. Expect a surprise soon.

I assume it's held to be OK to invest and speculate in stocks, because they are intangibles and discretionary items, but not OK for investors to turn their attention to property as a wealth creation vehicle because it is human shelter, i.e. that the concept of owner-occupied property should trump the concept of residential property as an investment class?

No doubt JMK said that with great irony, while more or less agreeing with the basic premise.

I don't think he did.

I have read that the essential difference about Americans is that we succeed despite our gov't. Therefore, for the most part, it doesn't matter which set of hacks we have in there.

Europeans look toward their gov't to manage things.

I don't know if it's true, but it rings true.

I don’t know if it’s true, but it rings true.

like many things that ring true at first, i think that oversimplifies things. and comes from a funny place, like libertarianism or something

oscar wilde was gay also

John Maynard Keynes may have been the ultimate anti-Monetarist, but he was still a capitalist. And a pretty good one at that.

'a pretty good capitalist'? how so? he was an economist, commenting on a capitalist system

here are some quotes from the vilely gay oscar wilde. naturally, anyone who is straight, such as schmend rick, will always contribute far more to society than someone who is gay, so i don't know why anyone even paid attention to oscar wilde - presumably he is just useful as some sort of moral example of utter wrongness. schmend rick will follow up with links to his own set of highly superior and thoughtful plays and witticisms which enrich all our lives.

A man can be happy with any woman as long as he does not love her.

Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.

America had often been discovered before Columbus, but it had always been hushed up.

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination.

Arguments are to be avoided; they are always vulgar and often convincing.

Biography lends to death a new terror.

Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.

I always like to know everything about my new friends, and nothing about my old ones.

Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.

I am not young enough to know everything.

If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures.

It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information.

One should always play fairly when one has the winning cards.

no, i'm not, actually... it would be the worse for you if i were, heh

>>does gathering facts improve our life?

Facts for facts sake? That's trivia. It can be a good hobby, and a hobby can improve your life.

I just watched a children’s educational presentation on Global Climate Change. They trotted out the Mann “Hockey Stick” graph. You know, the one that shows no Medieval Warming Period. The nice facilitator might as well have been wearing a Brownshirt.

so true. we'll just have to wait and see... wish england would get warmer soon...

So much bad science! Don’t you know the real truth? Global warming is caused by the steady decline in the number of pirates in the world. Look at the data. The correlation is very strong on this – stronger than the facts supporting any other theory!

Here is a link for this and other great knowledge about our universe and its creator: http://www.venganza.org/

the latter. assuming you're collectiong at all...

Imagine growing a wide range of crops in Siberia, and further north in Canada. Throughout history the prosperity of mankind and advancement of civilization has been positively correlated with world temperatures. Global warming, while disruptive if too fast, should bring another episode of such prosperity.

could happen...

>>maybe our economy is going to collapse because the whole country wont stop blogging.

Smartest thing said today.

>>maybe our economy is going to collapse because the whole country wont stop blogging.

Smartest thing said today.

yes, but it's a bit self-referential and recursive...

Sure the ocean effects overwhelm the paddy emissions.

what does irish flatulence have to do with it? surely they're no worse than any other country...

Different Sean Said:
‘a pretty good capitalist’? how so? he was an economist, commenting on a capitalist system

John Maynard Keynes: The Economist As Savior 1920-1937 : A Biography
by Robert Skidelsky

His net worth was over ₤500,000 in 1936, or more than ₤13 million at current values (p. 524). Keynes achieved similar success (and failures) for his friends and for King's. Skidelsky succeeds in bringing out the relationship between Keynes' pursuit of wealth and his pursuit for good life in a clear manner and in captivating detail.

And...

The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics
Biography of John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)

"...Contrary to some of his critics' assertions, Keynes was a relatively strong advocate of free markets. It was Keynes, not Adam Smith, who said "there is no objection to be raised against the classical analysis of the manner in which private self-interest will determine what in particular is produced, in what proportions the factors of production will be combined to produce it, and how the value of the final product will be distributed between them." Keynes believed that once full employment was achieved by fiscal policy measures, the market mechanism could then operate freely. "Thus," continued Keynes, "apart from the necessity of central controls to bring about an adjustment between the propensity to consume and the inducement to invest, there is no more reason to socialize economic life than there was before.""