« First « Previous Comments 64 - 103 of 277 Next » Last » Search these comments
RH,
I was agreeing with Peter P who responded to your quote. I'm just joining the pile on top of Randy crowd. ;-)
I certainly agree that our Tax policies are a bigger threat to my long term economic health than the Fed meddling.
"predictable for the average Joe so he can plan accordingly and avoid getting stolen from."
Hopefully this would not include Uncle Al suggesting ARMs for mass-consumption in a rising-rate environment AND when rates are already at historical lows.
Red Whine,
Yo! Even the financial media struggled with the logic of that one! Those comments should have served as a warning to GTFO! Yo!
Just for a laugh check out www.sdcia.com. Man, talk about "equity locusts"! Got to the message boards and check out "Losing Shirt in Tucson". Freaking hysterical!
Harm wrote at the top, regarding FED priorities -
–Implement monetary policy by open market operations, setting the discount rate, and setting the reserve ratio
Yes, they’ve done a “mah-velous†job of flooding capital markets with unlimited liquidity, blowing asset bubbles and destroying the value of the USD –kudos to them!
Actually HARM, don't you think out of control federal, personal and corporate debt might be more responsible for the freefall of the US Dollar than anything else.
Don't forget, the Fed incluences world economics, but the exchange rate of the dollar is a complicated thing, influenced by the world.
If you are talking about the intrinsic worth of a US Dollar, what it will buy, as opposed to its exchange rate, I still don't think the Fed can take much of the blame.
If not for the carousel of financial instruments for cash for crap from China, bombs and bail outs, would not the whole position of the US economy be completely reversed? And the Treasury Dept sets the rates that matter in this arena. And they were influenced by rates in Japan as much as by the Fed, I'm sure.
You can't blame the ceaseless trade deficit entirely on the fed. And the deficit, and debt financing of America by Asia, are factors not under the sway of the Fed. Just my opinion.
I didn't know sdcia.com existed until I visited this board. Can these people possibly be for real? Someone here coined a phrase "irrational lust for depreciating assets" or similar -- perfect.
tsusiat,
Yeah I can kind of go along with that but; when in the last 5 years + was the "cost of money" a deal killer? I mean seriously, as individuals or corporations? If you can think of examples where an aquisition or expansion plans were shelved b/c the board decided not to move forward b/c int. rates would mean the investment would have to make sense I'm open. Be it an SUV or a whatever?
What I should have said is that a lot of things may have "died on the vine" for various reasons but it wasn't b/c of the cost of money. Especially so soon after pets.com! Fast, loose and easy money for everyone with a ONE page business plan!
DinOR,
If all those hedge fund managers are SO smart why do they keep calling me for ideas? Me?
I surely didn't mean to imply that they really are as smart as they think they are. Since installing site monitoring on my cap2.0 blog I have discovered 6 or 7 hedge funds that are regularly downloading my "research".
After I finished laughing I got the bright idea to create a contra-hedge-hedge-fund. Seed these "geniuses" with my own research then take bets against what I've told them to be true.
Since installing site monitoring on my cap2.0 blog I have discovered 6 or 7 hedge funds that are regularly downloading my “researchâ€.
Randy, rename the site to "Center for Capitalism Research" and you will get even more hits. :)
Randy H,
LOL! Lord, that is too much. Well, these guys are relentless if nothing else. As if we were in need of more folly check out www.sdcia.com. In the boards there's this guy losing his shirt in Tucson. These guys are almost in pure "damage control" mode and if you needed evidence of "equity locusts" look no further!
>>If all those hedge fund managers are SO smart why do they keep calling me for ideas? Me?
Dinor,
I'm getting into that racket and I wouldn't mind talking to you. I always want to hear what everyone is thinking.
Michael Anderson,
I think SQT or Randy H can get you my e-mail, so no problem. Can't speak for Bend but I think we reached 106 degrees on Monday (much cooler now).
–Maintain a strong payments system
No argument here –creditors/lenders of all kinds have enjoyed limitless cash-flow under the Fed. Debtors on the other hand…
That's not what I think they meant (although I agree with the connotation). The payments system is the Automated Clearinghouse System (ACH origination and inter-bank check clearing). That, actually, is one of the reasons that you don't have to take your check to another bank for cashing and deposit into your bank. This is also the basis for much of the online banking in the US since ACH originations go over the US clearinghouse overseen by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Bottom line is they owe $600k against the house and have $200k in credit card debt.
OMFG :shock:
It was appraised in 2001 for $1million, but since the property needs some repairs
There may be a silver lining here. If it was appraised at that much way back in 2001 (the very earliest phase of the HB), then it must be valued at WAY more than that now. Appreciation for the Sacramento area since 2001 is something like 150-200% on average, right? Even assuming the place needs a ton of big repairs (new roof, plumbing, electrical), I can't imagine that would amount to more than $100-200K in buyer credits. This, plus the $600K mortgage(s) plus $200K CC should still leave them with a couple of million dollars free & clear (assuming they sell fast).
But it might not be enough to cover the debt and put money down on a new place.
Commision to sell + closing costs for the new place may amount to more than 70K - 80K.
Can they try to sub-divide and sell part of the land away? 1/2 acre of prime raw land should worth something.
That full-acre lot is where most of the "house" value is, not the structure itself. You may be (pleasantly) surprised at what it appraises for today, especially if local zoning allows it to be sub-divided into multiple SFH lots.
Even if it's not worth $3 million, you must impress upon them that the high-interest CC debt alone will eat them alive if they don't act quickly. And the longer they wait in a falling market, the worse their prospects will be (as in BK).
>>The land isn’t divided up in a way that would make that possible.
Well, how much would the land be worth if the house was knocked down?
SQT,
Oh, thank you for the e-mail exchange! Just another plus for Patrick regulars.
I am curious though as to why folks in that age group never seem to be able to confide in their children (or anyone for that matter) until it's too late or certainly in the 11th hour?
I've always been SO candid with my daughters about money matters. During the 90's (when they took karate lessons and everything under the sun) Mrs. DinOR and I took care to explain that things may not always be like this. We further explained that neither of their parents are anticipating any kind of an inheritance so we're pretty much it. (There really isn't a DinOR family fortune). When it came time for college the expectations (particularly after a long and difficult bear market) were pretty realistic.
It certainly didn't seem to suprise you all that much but I can't help but feel that there was much consolation in being that right either. I'm sure they'll be fine but it looks like their "expectations" will have to come around as well?
DinOR says:
Myself and others have been most vocal regarding “dis-enrollment†for 401K participants! Meaning you’re new on board, we automatically enroll you into the plan and if you really, really want out you have to jump through hoops.
it's compulsory for nearly all workers here - including a mandatory employer's contribution of 8% of earnings. plus a voluntary employee's contribution. all with tax advantages, of course.
Are we having fun yet?
Here's my situation. Moved to a rental in June. Sold my house in October. Investor owner of the house we're in let us know they were selling (I don't blame them--smart). Finding another rental was horrible--three kids, big dog, cat. Tons of houses for sale, hardly anything for rent.
Finally found something. Now trying to move my stuff with little kids on summer break. Have to pick up a few appliances. Have to change mail, bank accounts, brokerage accounts, garbage, cable, phone, electric water, etc.
Good lord.
Moving into a nice 4-bedroom place. I talked with the neighbor there. I asked about the owner of the place I'm going into. He says they are waiting for the top of the market to sell. I only hope they wait until the one-year lease is over before they decide to sell. If they break the lease, sure, I get to pocket a little money, but then it's back to trying to find another rental in the same school district again.
"Why don't you just buy?" everyone asks.
DS,
Good on ya mate! Perhaps there is a thing or two we can learn from the Aussies! It's so crazy it just might work! With our Pension Benefit Gaurantee Corp. about 28 bil. under funded (steel and airline bailouts) maybe they can assert pressure in the right places? That or keep the canned "roo" meat coming.
SQT,
Well that is an alarming situation. Can keeping up appearances be THAT important to Dad? I've got to be honest, after surviving a 3 yr. bear market I'm a little beyond caring about what other people think.
At least the cat is out of the bag. Your Dad hates the exposure, no doubt, but at least he doesn't have to hide things anymore. Hard to sleep with secrets.
Cultivate lobsters in the swimming pool.
We do not have a swimming pool. Only two tubs. I do not want to bathe with clawed creatures.
>>One thing we like to do that is less wasteful is shop twice a week. We don’t do it as much right now, but it helps because only 3-4 days are planned at a time.
That's interesting. Seems counter-intuitive. I'd think that by buying large amounts in bulk, you'd save. I presume your take is that if you shop twice a week, nothing has a chance to go bad?
RE: downsizing to a small condo
How much stuff do they have? We are only 29 and we are already unable to go below a 2/2 apartment and 500 cubic ft of storage.
Tons! They have a fully furnished 5 bedroom home with a very large pool table and two pinball machines.
They will be selling a lot of stuff!
It is not going to be easy.
>>I am not a big fan if bulk food, often Sam’s Club and Costco may save money, but then there is twice as much cardboard and packaging.
Now wait a minute. Wouldn't the volume of the food increase faster than the surface area of the packaging?
Anyway, I suppose you could have the best of both worlds. Keep the bulk purchases to non-perishables, then pick up perishables twice a week.
« First « Previous Comments 64 - 103 of 277 Next » Last » Search these comments
Randy H Said:
HARM Replied:
Federal Reserve System from Wikipedia
Roles and responsibilities
The main tasks of the Federal Reserve are to:
–Supervise and regulate banks
Not doing so well on that score lately from my POV.
–Implement monetary policy by open market operations, setting the discount rate, and setting the reserve ratio
Yes, they’ve done a “mah-velous†job of flooding capital markets with unlimited liquidity, blowing asset bubbles and destroying the value of the USD –kudos to them!
–Maintain a strong payments system
No argument here –creditors/lenders of all kinds have enjoyed limitless cash-flow under the Fed. Debtors on the other hand…
–Control the amount of currency that is made and destroyed on a day to day basis (in conjunction with the Mint and Bureau of Engraving and Printing)
Kind of depends on what you mean by “controlâ€, doesn’t it? If you mean “set the money-creation spigot permanently to ‘ON’ and flood asset/capital markets until you have one speculative bubble after anotherâ€, then they’ve done a bang-up job!
In short, I believe the Fed has failed miserably at serving the public’s interests (assuming that it ever really had anything to do with this –I doubt it) and has only succeeded in making the business cycle even more volatile/extreme than it already was. Let’s not forget that the 1930s Great Depression, 1970s Stagflation and several severe recessions occurred on the Fed’s watch (founded in 1913), as has the consistent destruction of the purchasing power of the USD, in the interests of fake nominal “growth†through inflation.
The Treasury handles the production of paper money and coinage just fine. What exactly do we (the public) need a Federal Reserve System for?
Discuss, enjoy...
HARM