0
0

Has the U.S. housing bubble delayed or prevented other bubbles from collapsing?


               
2006 Aug 30, 10:05am   14,012 views  113 comments

by HARM   follow (0)  

global housing bubble

Given this is a very Bay Area and California-centric blog, we often tend to forget that the RE bubble is arguably international in scale. The Economist pointed this out in an excellent piece last year. One of the most perplexing mysteries to many of us fundamentals-driven contrarians, is why haven't the housing bubbles in other countries --which started before the U.S. bubble-- already collapsed?

The Australian, UK and Irish bubbles had a good 2-3 year head start on the U.S. by some measures, while the Netherlands hasn't had a significant price correction in some 15 years. By all accounts, they should have seen sizeable price corrections well before now, and yet we are only recently seeing reports that indicate these booms are finally past their peaks. Could it be that the U.S. housing bubble itself delayed or prevented these other bubbles from collapsing as quickly as they otherwise might have? Could it be that all the Fed/GSE generated USDs and specuvestor credit sloshing around the globe might have propped up the overseas housing bubbles for longer than they would have survived without us?

For that matter, does a rapidly deteriorating housing & credit market here portend doom for these overseas markets? If an SDCIA "investor" here sneezes, does the rest of the world catch a cold?

Discuss, enjoy...
HARM

#housing

Comments 1 - 16 of 113       Last »     Search these comments

1   Randy H   @   2006 Aug 30, 10:40am  

There are over $400 Trillion in derivatives.

That is the total derivatives market, not the MBS and CDO derivatives. Many derivatives are stable and not worrisome. Many have liquid commodities or equities as underlyings.

2   Glen   @   2006 Aug 30, 10:56am  

Randy,

Any idea what percentage of the global derivatives trade is tied in some way to RE values? I have no idea, but I suspect it is probably still a huge number.

What will happen when a major counterparty fails? Anybody's guess. I doubt it will be the end of civilization as we know it, but it should create some great buying opportunities for savvy investors with sufficient liquidity. I predict that Warren Buffett will end up owning a big chunk of MBSs purchased at a significant discount to face value. Buffett wound up with some valuable utility assets after the Enron fiasco.

3   Peter P   @   2006 Aug 30, 11:00am  

That is the total derivatives market, not the MBS and CDO derivatives. Many derivatives are stable and not worrisome. Many have liquid commodities or equities as underlyings.

But will they all become part of the chain reaction? Cascading Cross Default?

4   Glen   @   2006 Aug 30, 11:25am  

If/when there is a derivatives implosion, it would be hard to steer clear of it. Ironically, unleveraged real estate may turn out to be a pretty good store of value.

5   Glen   @   2006 Aug 30, 11:36am  

But will they all become part of the chain reaction? Cascading Cross Default?

If so, it could get scary. Is it just me, or does it occur to others that our federal government has recklessly guaranteed just about everything in our economy? Public and private pensions (PBGC), bank deposits (FDIC), mortgages ("implied" Fannie/Freddie guarantee), student loans (Guaranteed student loans), retirement (Social Security), medical care for the poor and elderly (Medicare), etc., etc...

Given the rapidly deteriorating federal finances, I suspect that the US gov't will need to repudiate at least some of this debt either explicitly (very politically unpopular and could worsen crisis) or implicitly (via inflation). My bet is on inflation.

6   astrid   @   2006 Aug 30, 11:53am  

There's no guarantee that RE would retain their nominal value (nevermind real value) outside of a hyperinflation scenario. High inflation would just push up the cost of things like food and gas, and seriously squeeze FBs stuck with ARMs. The high interest rates would also squeeze buyers out of the market.

Cash and commodities are probably the best place to be for the moment.

Not investment advice.

7   Randy H   @   2006 Aug 30, 12:53pm  

But will they all become part of the chain reaction? Cascading Cross Default?

Somewhat unlikely. At most I'd expect to see a lot of counterparty defaults resulting in increased settlements for virtual delivery of the underlyings, which would ultimately be settled in cash.

It could have the effect of chasing speculation out of the more esoteric derivatives for a long time to come.

More worrisome to me would be a cascade of failures of prime brokers triggered by hedge funds collapsing. If enough HFs fail, then unwinding their derivatives trades could crash those markets and leave prime brokers up a river and on the hook for settlements. But prime brokers have pretty deep pockets and a lot of Fed influence.

8   Zephyr   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:31pm  

UK, AUS, USA - three very different RE markets, with different buying patterns, different financing structures, and different economies. The comparison is at best a distraction from the important considerations for evaluating our market.

In RE, Demography is Destiny...
How many people, at what ages, with what income distribution...

Everthing else is either temporary or a subtlety...

...and overpowered by demography.

9   HARM   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:37pm  

UK, AUS, USA - three very different RE markets, with different buying patterns, different financing structures, and different economies.

And yet, all three experiencing historically unprecedented run-ups in RE prices vs. rents and incomes over the last decade, while simultaneously experiencing flat (UK, AUS) to moderate (US) population growth. And while the international credit markets (derivatives, CDOs/MBSs, Forex, credit swaps, etc.) become more interrelated and interdependent by the day.

Pure coincidence? Spurious pirates-vs.-global-warming correlation? I think not.

10   Peter P   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:40pm  

And yet, all three experiencing historically unprecedented run-ups in RE prices vs. rents and incomes over the last decade, while simultaneously experiencing flat (UK, AUS) to moderate (US) population growth.

Must be synchronicity.

11   Peter P   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:53pm  

Could that be the Police? Great album

Huh?

12   Peter P   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:55pm  

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/rfs/200598266.html

It is quite close to 101. Is the area okay?

13   HARM   @   2006 Aug 30, 1:58pm  

@Steve The Owner,

"Buyer protection" only for 6 month period. A huge improvement over no contingencies + feed the squirrels (typical 2005 terms), but hardly risk free in a slowly declining market that could keep falling for 5-10 years. Also does not say if they will buy it back for PRICE YOU PAID.

14   Zephyr   @   2006 Aug 30, 2:13pm  

Coincidence or common cause?

What was the common cause that was also not also present in places with lesser price increases?

It is not principally credit, since the whole world experienced that (And the entire US experienced that) but many places saw no big price increases - even with the same credit conditions. Also, in the past we have had interest rates and prices sometimes move together and sometimes go in opposite directions. A long term study of interest rate movement and home price changes will show that the correlation is very very weak.

So what is it then? Population growth? Job growth and GDP growth varies by country and state. Is the variation in GDP growth correlated with the boom in prices? What is the proper time line to use as a base for analysis? Using only a few years one will reach dramatically different conclusions depending on which few years are used. For my investment analysis I use the last 40 years for careful analysis, and sometimes include the last 80 years for the more general observations. Looking forward I use a time horizon of 20 years.

Most people seem to look at the last downturn of the 1990s and draw their conclusions by comparison to that - often without understanding the boom that receded that bust. How many full cycles does one need to study to understand cycles? How many individual people does one need to study to be an expert on all people? Clearly more than one or two in both cases.

15   Peter P   @   2006 Aug 30, 2:14pm  

It is not principally credit, since the whole world experienced that (And the entire US experienced that) but many places saw no big price increases - even with the same credit conditions.

Credit is just an enabler or a trigger. Just like stars in the zodiac.

16   Zephyr   @   2006 Aug 30, 2:44pm  

US births have been running running at about 4 million per year for a while now... Plus immigration...

Interestingly the number of children in school this year is a new all-time record high. More students than during the baby boom! (has been for a few years now).

In a few years these students will be young adults in the job market, and seeking apartments to rent.

Comments 1 - 16 of 113       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste