« First « Previous Comments 227 - 230 of 230 Search these comments
DS
Crime and political opportunism have and will continue to spawn bona fide "conspiracies". No one contends that. A well planned bank robbery is a conspiracy, by definition. A well planned military action is as well, depending upon whether you're the bomber or the bombee. But all that junk about the WTC is so complex, involving so many people and so much clandestine, cross-boarder cooperation, that it's just practically implausible.
Planning stuff is hard.
Planning stuff and keeping it secret is very hard.
Planning stuff and keeping it secret amongst lots of people is extremely hard.
Planning stuff and keeping it secret amongst lots of people despite obvious moral, ethical and often spiritual personal conflicts for many involved is impossible.
But the X Files was a cool series.
It's difficult to maintain the "911 conspiracy" when theorists require the usage of CIA "voice morphing" to explain the cell phone calls. With that said my pilot friend says that only an advanced test pilot could have flown into the WTC at that speed and embankment. I listen to UK radio and the acceptance of a conspiracy is near universal.
Might as well add in a very plausible explanation I've heard regarding the classification of Pentagon-related photos & video. What I've heard from some former defence intelligence (retired) guys is that it's very likely that videos and some photos of the Pentagon attack capture the facility's automatic air defence measures in action. And, that those measures proved faulty, inadequate, or simply ineffective. This evidence would be immediately classified as a threat to national security just as fast as someone discovering maps of secret steam tunnels into NORAD. The DoD doesn't really want functional videos of "how to destroy the pentagon" posted on every anti american website, after all.
these are all post hoc explanations (about file footage, etc). and the explanations certainly haven't come from the defence establishment themselves. there are plenty of photos of the pentagon out there -- that explanation sounds particularly unlikely to me -- they could even edit out or blur superficial details they wanted to hide... i really can't see that footage realistically becoming a primer to so-called 'terrorists' at any time in the future -- besides which , you can see the pentagon up close just driving past to DC... plus all the photos taken of the actual fire and damage. what protections are there, anyhow? thickened and reinforced walls, which is the work that was being done at the time -- and the late-scrambling fighter planes are meant to be the protection...
i take your point that it's hard to plan something like 9/11 -- it seems implausible -- and yet... there are Black Ops teams in the CIA, and we don't know what they get up to. Clearly they are expert in using explosives, also. plus a willing Mossad with divided loyalties getting involved to precipitate a middle-eastern crisis. There seem to be a lot of threats of people losing their jobs and gags being applied too... a metallurgist working for the labs that did some of the steel analyses lost his job for writing a letter saying he didn't see how it was possible... the firefighters were gagged...
it's reached the point where Zoo! magazine just published 3 or 4 pages reiterating all the 9/11 conspiracy points in their last issue, by a coincidence...
a friend of mine who lived in the states for a while said that most of the people they met there thought the X-files was a documentary... ;)
« First « Previous Comments 227 - 230 of 230 Search these comments
Some notorious quotes --like events-- represent pivotal moments that should never be forgotten. They should be preserved for posterity and passed along to future generations to serve as a warning. Some of the crap the REIC (Real Estate Industrial Complex) has been spewing for the last 5 years meets this lowly standard of putrescence.
Whenever these shills try to reverse course, change their tunes or revise history in the face of (now undeniable) evidence that their empire is crumbling, these quotes should be trotted out and rubbed in their lying, ugly faces at every opportunity.
Here are some of my infamous favorites:
Source: L.A. Times (August 28, 2005)
“Equity Is Altering Spending Habits and View of Debtâ€
Source: Federal Reserve Board (February 23, 2004)
Remarks by Chairman Alan Greenspan: Understanding household debt obligations
(just as Greenspan was preparing to start RAISING rates from 1%)
Source: N.Y. Times (March 25, 2005)
Trading Places: Real Estate Instead of Dot-Coms
Source: CNN Money/Fortune (February 13, 2006)
A tale of two markets
Source: N.Y. Times (October 16, 2005)
Chasing Ground
Bob Toll (President of Toll Brothers):
Source: N.Y. Times (March 25, 2005)
Trading Places: Real Estate Instead of Dot-Coms:
Source: Planet Jackson Hole (September 6, 2006)
Un-Real Estate
Source: Contra Costa Times (September 13, 2006)
Housing bubble may spare East Bay
Source: WILX.com (January 10, 2007)
Housing Market Recovery?
Source: newspress.com (January 24, 2007)
Low bids take glow off property auction
Source: Monterey County Herald (June 29, 2006)
Reaching The Dream Without Moving In California
Source: brisbanetimes.com (September 3, 2008)
Sky's no limit for property prices
Please post some of your own favorite "pearls of wisdom" you feel are especially worthy of remembrance.
HARM
#housing