0
0

Ben Jones & Patrick: Psychics or Super-Geniuses?


 invite response                
2007 Mar 6, 9:13am   19,460 views  179 comments

by HARM   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Patrick's alter ego? Ben Jones - mathematical genius?

As the rolling bubble crash gathers steam, and even formerly hostile MSM sources now reluctantly admit the bubble --and its bursting-- is undeniably real, one question remains: how did people like Patrick Killelea and Ben Jones correctly predict all this so accurately beforehand?

Nearly two years ago, Ben and Patrick founded their now-famous blogs, dedicated to the national housing bubble. They boldly predicted its demise as "inevitable" long, long before most industry experts would even admit the bubble even existed. Now events are unfolding almost like clockwork, almost exactly as predicted:

  • Exhaustion and unaffordability leads first to falling sales & rising inventories, but very sticky prices (at first).
  • Inability to continue flipping and/or serially refinancing forces flippers and over-leveraged FBs to try to exit, spiking inventories and gradually un-sticking prices in successive waves of option-ARM resets.
  • Failure to indefinitely to hide default/foreclosure/repurchase losses off the balance sheets forces many sub-prime operators and MSB issuers out of business, drying up liquidity.
  • The MEW-ATM shutdown spills over into the general economy and either triggers a general recession, or at the very least, localized recessions in extreme-bubble regions.
  • The crash slowly grinds away over years, eroding homedebtor equity via a combination of inflation and nominal price drops, until the price-rent/price-income equilibrium is finally restored.
  • Finally, the rolling crash becomes obvious even to the most clueless FB and the cheerleading MSM. Newsweek issues it's "Housing: Worst Investment Ever!" cover story, close to the exact market bottom.
  • My questions: how could such seemingly average Joes ever predict such events when the brightest, most highly paid industry experts could not? I mean, David Lereah went from "no bubble" to "correction's over" in like 30 seconds flat! If the danger signs were so obvious, then why didn't we hear about them beforehand from the NAR... the Fed... Wall Street? It's not as if these frequently quoted (and rarely challenged) "industry experts" could possibly have known about this mess beforehand, but just kept it to themselves for some reason. Like, that's just conspiratorial, tinfoil-hat wing-nuttery, right?

    So, if the only way to perceive an asset/credit bubble is after-the-fact (as Sir Alan Greenspan has asserted), then how could Ben and Patrick possibly have known about it that far back? Are they psychic? Are these guys prescient modern-day Nostradamus-es? Or, are they financial super-wizards --real-life Hari Seldons-- who can accurately predict the future with mathematical precision, but posing as regular guys? If the housing bubble was so impossible to predict, even with access to the very best market data and cutting-edge computing power (as the experts insist it was), then how could two ordinary working-class stiffs manage to pull off such a feat by themselves?

    Should we be concerned that Patrick and Ben are some form of genetically mutated super-geniuses hiding in plain sight?? How else could they possibly have foreseen the unforeseeable?

    Spooky, isn't it? :roll:

    Discuss, enjoy...
    HARM

    #housing

    « First        Comments 169 - 179 of 179        Search these comments

    169   Bruce   2007 Mar 7, 10:08am  

    I see FDIC just issued cease and desist against Fremont.

    http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/index.html

    170   OO   2007 Mar 7, 10:12am  

    NV,

    I belong to one of those you are talking about (from HK initially and came here around the time you mentioned). But the new wave of Chinese coming here from mainland China are quite different, they have never seen capitalism growing up. Also, those who came here later never saw the bad times so their frame of reference became very skewed.

    Not all Chinese are shrewd and smart. Chinese culture (and Japanese too) is largely centered on herd mentality and conformity. If everyone is buying in Saratoga, you have to buy one there. If everyone is investing in real estate, you will look like an outcast if you don't.

    That's why I kept my mouth shut in the last few years among my Chinese friends when they became so excited over the housing market. They tend to put personal pride into business judgement, if you question the business decision, it will be taken as a challenge to his intelligence and pride.

    Many of my Chinese friends and acquaintances did participate in bidding wars in the last few years. They still do.

    171   OO   2007 Mar 7, 10:16am  

    NV,

    you are also mixing up being shrewd with being cheap. All Chinese are cheap, but only very few of us are actually shrewd.

    If you see a popular Chinese restaurant with lots of Chinese patrons, I can guarantee that it is not because of the food, it's because of the price. Chinese grocery markets here usually offer the rock-bottom price taking the quality along with it.

    Being shrewd means getting the best bang for the buck. Jews are much better than Chinese in that respect. Chinese are just good at parting with the least buck.

    172   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:32am  

    OO,

    I have asked you before and ask you again. Are you sure you are talking about Chinese people ? I can say the same thing about Indians, Indian grocery markets etc ;-)

    The herd mentality part although comes from being immigrant. Indians in India do not have any "extra" herd mentality than other societies. Conformity and cost consciousness are trademark of my generation. The freshly minted rich youngsters from Banglore are spendthrifts and VERY VERY different.

    Even though I feel Indian buyers haven't come around to accept that RE prices can decline big time, it seems that no one is afraid to be priced out forever. Just my gut feeling. They just feel smarter to buy at a lower price than last year.

    173   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:48am  

    The TOL CEO must be desperate to try this ridiculous spin. Cancellations can go to zero but what's the big deal if sales also go to zero ? Cancellations are important only to identify change of sentiment from positive to negative. If sales don't pick up, who cares how cancellations are doing ? People cannot cancel orders they have never placed.

    Maybe DELL can learn something from them. "Not as many people are placing orders, but that's not important. What is important is not as many people are canceling their orders. WOOOOOHOOO."

    174   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:52am  

    I see FDIC just issued cease and desist against Fremont.

    Tomorrow I will cray half a tear for FMT bottom feeders. Hmm. Maybe not.

    175   StuckInBA   2007 Mar 7, 10:52am  

    s/cray/cry

    176   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 10:57am  

    You mean, like these townhomes “starting in the $1,500,000″ range?

    To be fair, most of their offerings are a little cheaper than that. :) And that IS Shallow Alto they're building in, there.

    177   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 11:04am  

    I'm just saying that most of what they build is cheaper than 1.5 million, not that housing isn't retarded right now.

    178   sfbubblebuyer   2007 Mar 7, 11:27am  

    At least you didn't offer to refi my home with an option ARM, PAR. :)

    179   HARM   2007 Mar 8, 3:09am  

    AG,

    Welcome to the blog! Come breathe the free air of Truth.

    Maine politicians complain of “brain drain” and can’t figure out why so many young people leave.

    Once again, I think that Upton Sinclair quote applies:

    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it."

    All politicians are afraid of saying ANYTHING negative about loanownership --regardless of what they really think-- because:

    (a) It's the "Amerikan Dreamâ„¢", and you... do... love Amerika, don't you...?
    (b) Nearly 70% of their constituents are loanowners vs. JBRs.
    (c) The percentage of loanowners who regularly vote is also significantly higher than JBRs.
    (d) They are getting an a$$load of lobbyist money and campaign contributions from NAR/NAHB/MBAA and like organizations.

    State and local politicians are even MORE beholden to the REIC, because state/local budgets get a disproportionate share of their tax revenue from property owners.

    It's all about knowing which side your bread is buttered on...

    « First        Comments 169 - 179 of 179        Search these comments

    Please register to comment:

    api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste