0
0

September 12, 2037


 invite response                
2007 Apr 3, 5:37am   23,661 views  333 comments

by e   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,915445,00.html

Unleashing their pent-up demands and taking advantage of fairly easy mortgage money, millions of people are shopping for houses. In Santa Rosa, Calif., a 90-minute commute north of San Francisco, buyers in June began camping out in sleeping bags on a Thursday night to be first in line Saturday morning when 27 houses in a new subdevelopment went on sale. In the Kendall neighborhood of southwestern Dade County, the last open area reasonably close to Miami, prospective buyers on weekends parade caravan-like in cars and campers through flag-festooned developments.

Sound familiar? Yet another story from 2005? Nope... the publication date of this article was September 12, 1977 - nearly 30 years ago.

Let's look at some other snippets from this time capsule:

Rachelle Resnick, 27, a San Francisco school-bus driver, counts herself fortunate to have bought—with much help from her father—a two-bedroom house that she candidly describes as "a little nothing." It cost $48,500, and she will have to spend $5,000 or so to repair termite damage. But had she waited, it almost surely would have gone higher. The house sold in June 1976 for $28,000, and has since been resold four times by four separate speculators, none of whom lived in it.

Such speculation is common in California and is beginning to appear in other states. Indeed, California is a housing Oz unto itself; its population is still growing faster than that of any other large state except Texas; the recession bit especially deep in California, creating a huge backlog of demand, and strict environmental requirements severely limit the land available for housing. Prices are starting to level off, but the level is in the stratosphere. In platinum-plated Beverly Hills, one cynical real estate broker exclaims: "Oh, I have such a dog on the market right now! Come to my Sunday open house and see what I'm offering for $185,000. I can tell you, for $185,000 you get a piece of nothing." Tom Lorch, a high school principal who is looking for a house in San Francisco, adds, "When we talk about houses, it's money, money, money—not how we're going to live, which seems wrong. And these absurd numbers, $100,000. It's some kind of fantasy world."

Does anyone know what happened to the housing market in California after 1977? Or was the impact of Prop 13 too influential in the resulting statistics?

And finally, the social impact:

Like all inflations, housing inflation has serious social effects. Some wives feel forced to go to work, not because they want to have careers or earn their own spending money, but because buying that dream house nowadays usually requires two incomes. Six out often first-time buyers are families in which both husband and wife hold jobs. Couples who want to have children sometimes face the brutal choice of a house or a child—and, more often than in past years, select the house. In the early postwar period, sociologists and merchants suggested that Americans spent too little on shelter, too much on less basic needs. If so, the market has more than corrected that tendency. In order to buy a house, couples are scrimping drastically on other spending—for cars, food and even furniture; not a few fancy new houses are almost bare inside. Young people have always asked parents for help in scraping up the down payment on a home; mortgage bankers call the payoff from papa a "gift letter." Now the pool of cash required to spend the first night in a new house—frequently $20,000 to $30,000—has made this sacrifice of independence a matter of necessity rather than choice.

So... this was in 9/1977. Now, it's hard enough predicting what 9/2007 will be like - but what do you think September 12, 2037 will be like?

Already, both parents are working, realtors are spinning the Bay Area as a place so great that you don't need to take vacations - what's next? Will child labor make a come back? ("Monta Vista High School and Fireworks Factory #88"?) How much more special can it get here?

(Bonus points for including Peak Oil in your prediction...)

#housing

« First        Comments 132 - 171 of 333       Last »     Search these comments

132   DaBoss   2007 Apr 4, 4:57am  

"Can someone tell me why it is so adverse to changes (e.g. redevelopment, demolition, etc)? I thought liberals are supposed to be open-minded. "

OH Lord.. have you even been there??? There is more development there than any time before. Take a long look next to the ball park... you will more homes being built.

133   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 4:59am  

Before Winblow$ we had Mac OS and Geoworks… Far far better!

How so? Windows enjoyed a huge market share. Its phenomenal market penetration allowed the rapid development of the silly valley.

134   DaBoss   2007 Apr 4, 5:02am  

"See, creative destruction."

Actually see Toshiba Samsung ( Asian Tigers) due to highly educated and cheap labor froce back in 1985-90. Bills Gates had nothing to do with it.

Bill Gates runs the biggest Monoply in the world.

135   Randy H   2007 Apr 4, 5:05am  

theotherside

You can keep repeating that half-math over and over all you wish. I still await your systematic, quantitative disproof or criticism of my publicly published model. You promised that over 6 months ago now. Thus my "vitriol". At this point you're just Trolling. I've taken the time to disprove your calculations in past threads, in excruciating detail. In the end you were shown to be relying upon hidden, unrealistic assumptions about continued perpetual out-of-band housing price growth.

By your own assumptions 23 threads ago, housing will constitute 99.9% of all world GDP by 2050. Wow.

Here's the gauntlet. I'll take you seriously as soon as you:

a) Reveal your identity or at least enough to establish credibility. You know who I am. Even anonymous people like FAB and DinOR have revealed enough to establish credible identity. Short of that you could be some investment banker's desperate adolescent teenage daughter going through some attention spasm for all I know.

b) Give & take. When I respond to your detailed calculations with similarly detailed responses don't just repeat yourself again half a dozen threads later. You know, we had another Troll who kept showing the same Marina property which sold for like $250K over asking for nearly a year as evidence there was no bubble.

c) When you agree to take up a challenge, do it. What's wrong with my model? Half a year ago you chuffed it aside as obviously flawed, and easily debunked. Forgive my incredulity, but *show me or STFU*.

136   DaBoss   2007 Apr 4, 5:05am  

"How so? Windows enjoyed a huge market share. Its phenomenal market penetration allowed the rapid development of the silly valley."

If you dont know about these things Im not going to rewite the history of MSFT monoplitic practice over the past decades. Do you expect that! LOL Silly Boy! You must be really young!!!

137   DaBoss   2007 Apr 4, 5:06am  

"Err… perhaps because not enough people moved in to oppose new projects yet?"

OK you wasted enough of my time... I see your an idiot!!!!

138   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:10am  

Perhaps SFWoman can shred some light on the subject.

139   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:13am  

Randy H,

TIME OUT! TIME OUT!

O.K, let's settle this once and for all! "theotherside" can be become "The Minister of Finance" over at Second Life and live happily ever after! (in fantasyland). :)

140   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:14am  

Randy, you are wasting time. Can't we have some sushi? :)

141   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:17am  

If you dont know about these things Im not going to rewite the history of MSFT monoplitic practice over the past decades. Do you expect that!

Still. It is hard to image what would have happened without DOS and Windows. Technically superior products are useless if they do not sell.

You must be really young!!!

I wish.

142   Brent   2007 Apr 4, 5:17am  

Peter P-

skibum is correct, my confusion lies in the long term expectation for inflation beating performance in RE. It takes skilled intervention to manage any asset portfolio to outperform inflation, an area I fully admit my own woeful incompetence. But RE seems to exist outside this realm, at least in many otherwise well educated minds. As I see it that's the only rational basis for a huge chunk of the mortgage industry and the "climbing the RE ladder" mentality.

143   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:22am  

As I see it that’s the only rational basis for a huge chunk of the mortgage industry and the “climbing the RE ladder” mentality.

Also, until recently, homes are long-term assets. People were able to visualize the absolute appreciation of their homes. They can see huge gains in home equity with apparently no work.

144   Allah   2007 Apr 4, 5:23am  

Although we’ve kidded about picking up everything from Harley’s to jet skis on ebay I don’t believe this will lessen the demand for “new goods” much at all. These are “tainted goods”. Bought with “free money” and neglected almost as much as the shoddy homes that originally “facilitated” their purchase.

The people (real financial heros) that have been buying up consumer goods with the "free money" are the people who mostly make up the people buying the "new goods"; Thus driving the economy. Now that the "free money" is no longer there and many of these people are going to try to resell those "Equity Distressed Assets" (EDA's as I call them) to help them through their financial bind. Just the fact that they are no longer buying new stuff because of their situation is already lessening demand for the "new goods"; In addition to that, many people who are not in financial distress (aka. renters), may want to get some of those EDA's for half of what they would cost brand new (Depending on like you say, what shape they are in); Further reducing the demand for "new goods".

Speaking of Harley's, according to Roubini, many hogs have been purchased with subprime loans that are also going bad, I would imagine the same would be true for jetski's and such; You don't have to be a homedebtor to be a FB.

Refering to Patricks link, I wouldn't buy the piano. :lol:

145   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:25am  

Who was it that once described a home as "a high maint. long term depreciating asset off-set only by it's utility function"? :)

146   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:32am  

But… Peter P will be dabbling in owning a chain of sushi bars and astrid will manage an interplanetary seed exchange.

I like that future! :)

147   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:32am  

allah,

Spot on! In addition to the normal depreciation inflicted by the simple act of driving it off the showroom floor we need to calculate FB's burn rate to foreclosure, decline in median for your ZIP, absorbing "the glut" in the market for Harleys and then factor in neglect on top of normal wear and tear!

Meaning I can (generously) "give" you a two months reprieve on your mortgage OR 5K (whichever is the lesser). :)

148   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:37am  

Space_Acer,

We love ya' like a brother but in truth... we just don't get that emotional about software here. Well, I don't intend to speak for others so if you like getting emotional about it? Don't let ME stop you.

149   Michael Holliday   2007 Apr 4, 5:37am  

Space_Acer Says:

Had we not had a “Computer Revolution” back in the 1980s in SV (Silicon Valley) I doubt we would even be talking about this. We would still be sitting in a orchard field which is a low margin business and seen land prices been flat since 1950s. There would be no demand for land here … there was no reason…
_____

How about the weather? Good weather would have boosted prices a bit.

How about the Great Pumpking patches off Santa Teresa Blvd., where the Great Pumpkin would appear to Charlie Brown every year?

What about all the great punkin pie you could 'uv made? & the Porkypines and Hamsters roaming around the foothills & stuff & junk & what not?

150   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:41am  

It is fine to be emotional about software. It is also fine to call me an idiot. I am not emotional about it. :)

151   Randy H   2007 Apr 4, 5:42am  

:)

Just frustrates me, because folks like tOs drop late into every 3rd thread and spit out the same crap over and over. But it's well formed enough so that, if taken in isolation, it sure sounds credible to any new readers.

Maybe we need one of those "click on the name and see all their previous comments" functions here. Want to see tOs' cut & paste calculations, then looky here!

Ah well. Send 'er off to cartoon real estate land. I hear there's a huge bubble in progress there.

152   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:47am  

www.bonds.is (OT)

(Check out THAT yield!)

153   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:47am  

There are bigger fish to fry.

Can we grill the fish instead? I heard it is more heart-healthy.

154   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 5:48am  

(Check out THAT yield!)

WTF!? A slippery slope yield curve?

155   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:49am  

"click on the name and see all their previous comments"

Now THAT would be a waste of perfectly good technology!

156   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 5:50am  

Peter P,

I should have added:

NIA :)

157   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 6:03am  

newsfreak,

If you were to click on the Central Bank Policy Rates link you'd see that from JAN '05 to today their (Icelandic) short term rate has gone from 8.25% to 14.25%. Most folks would consider that downright slick.

158   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 6:09am  

I work in retail at the moment,
and I luvvvv capitalism,
that place where the consumer and the product intersect
and there is a sale,
a happy face.

I agree with you.

159   FormerAptBroker   2007 Apr 4, 6:11am  

Peter P Says:

> SF is a self-proclaimed liberal city. Can someone tell
> me why it is so adverse to changes (e.g. redevelopment,
> demolition, etc)? I thought liberals are supposed to
> be open-minded.

Liberals only like some kind of change for example they would support the demolition of a big single family home to build a homeless shelter (with bonus points if a white family lived in the home and the shelter was financed with a tax on homes in the city over 5,000 sf and double bonus points if all the homeless people were gay minority drug addicts with AIDS).

Liberals would not support the demolition of a drug and gang infested housing project by a for profit developer who agreed to house the same number of people in a nice new development that would be built without a penny of public money (if the city would give developers density bonuses they could house double the number of people we have in public housing today for free that would be financed by the rent and sale of market rate units on the sites).

160   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 6:12am  

FAB, you are very insightful.

161   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 6:13am  

the market is more difficult to understand when it comes to labor and wages.

This is because of asymmetric information. We can empower ourselves by knowing more.

162   FormerAptBroker   2007 Apr 4, 6:16am  

DinOR Says:

> Who was it that once described a home as
> “a high maint. long term depreciating asset off-
> set only by it’s utility function”?

Last time I remember us talking about “high maint. long term depreciating assets” was when SFWoman was explaining what a “Bowling Trophy Wife” was…

163   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 6:17am  

We should all live on fenceposts like birds.

I can fly!

164   DinOR   2007 Apr 4, 6:24am  

"SFWoman was explaining what a "Bowling Trophy" Wife was..." LOL!

Now that you mention it, the outcomes of both seem inevitable!

I guess the big difference is the BTW doesn't come complete with a mortgage int. deduction. :(

165   Allah   2007 Apr 4, 6:31am  

DinOR,

How about those Harley EDA's?

They don't look in too bad condition either; Just have to wait for the prices to drop some more.

166   Allah   2007 Apr 4, 6:32am  

Ooops! The Link

167   DaBoss   2007 Apr 4, 6:35am  

Holiday Asked...
"How about the weather? Good weather would have boosted prices a bit."

For a peach! sure it would. We had great weather in the central valley for decades, prices were still down. I sure didnt see any inflation above med prices 2-3x med income.

168   PAR   2007 Apr 4, 6:35am  

SocketSite has a forum. Low volume so far but could be interesting place to monitor exchanges among prospective BA buyers & sellers.

http:/s.socketsite.com/index.php

169   Allah   2007 Apr 4, 6:36am  

Motorcycles get 50 miles/ gal.

Perhaps we should be Wild Housing Hogs.

Bicycles get even more. :)

170   GammaRaze   2007 Apr 4, 6:42am  

OFFTOPIC: I posted a comment a while ago and now I look and it says "Awaiting moderation". Why? I sporadically comment here and have always been nice. Never insulting. Never trolling. You can look at all my previous comments.

I don't understand.

171   Peter P   2007 Apr 4, 6:52am  

SG, did your post contain two or more links? Did it contain one of the banned words like "sociali$m" (I believe it is "ciali$" that we wanted to block)?

« First        Comments 132 - 171 of 333       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions