0
0

The other side of renting


 invite response                
2010 Aug 8, 10:50am   20,424 views  86 comments

by danix   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

So, you've read all Patrick's articles, and you know it's not (yet) time to buy.
The smart thing to do is to rent, right? Yes, but can you find a rental?

We moved here (Walnut Creek) in 2006 and I thought prices were insane, so we rented.
Our landlord, who worked in real estate, owned several houses.
Fast forward a year and change, and he filed bankruptcy, meaning we were going to have to move.
It worked out well for us (we lived for around 18 months rent-free due to the bankruptcy and delays in the eventual foreclosure.
But, we had to move, and it's hard to find a place to rent when you've got 3 kids and a dog.

We lucked out, found a place and got a month to month lease since we're planning on buying very soon, whenever we find the right place (most likely at a foreclosure auction). A few things struck me as weird about our landlord so I did some digging. Turns out he owns several properties, at least two are in default and headed to auction. The house we're renting is not, yet, but odds are pretty good it's coming.

Along with the instability of landlords, a big problem in the listings I've seen is the "its only a rental" mentality. People install crap cabinets or appliances they would never live with themselves, but to them "it's only a rental" so somehow we're supposed to accept sub-standard quality when we're paying good rent.

I guess I'm just venting. If I had a stable landlord, I have no objection to continuing to rent while it makes sense. But, the way things are going, I might buy something well priced to live in for the short term, even if it's not perfect, then maybe rent it out later myself. It wouldn't be the kind of house we really want, but hey, it's only a rental, right? :)

#housing

« First        Comments 81 - 86 of 86        Search these comments

81   B.A.C.A.H.   2010 Aug 22, 10:11am  

Oh.

Weird, I thought your profile was Brentwood. Sorry for the mistake.

82   Cvoc13   2010 Aug 22, 10:26am  

It did, thank you helped me realize I had not updated it... No need to apologize, I don't want to be that GUY that is slamming anyone, I want to have a spirited well thought out dialog, I really feel for many reasons, that our Ca. BA in-particular is OVER PRICED and headed MUCH LOWER I want to talk about it, I live eat and breath economics (as a laymen) but I get off on the thought pattern it makes us think like.

83   B.A.C.A.H.   2010 Aug 22, 10:45am  

cvoc,

Some inlaws of mine relocated to a townhome settlement there, the breadwinner works as a staff at UCB. I really like their location because it is easy bicycle distance to the BART. Of course they overpaid for it in 2008 but that is a different story.

They drive to the BART but since it is such a short distance could easily handle peak oil gasoline prices.

If you ever wanna get together at the Starbucks in "The Shops" where sometimes I go during seemingly endless weekend afternoon visits sitting around the living room listening to inlaws "catch up" about others who I don't know who/what they are talking about, gimmee a yell.

84   grywlfbg   2010 Aug 22, 4:49pm  

Wow, this topic has been all over the place.

At the end of the day, the pro-housing arguments are predicated on the recession ending and the economy (jobs, wages, etc) continuing to recover. IMO this is not a sure thing. We could quite likely see a return to negative GDP this year. People are still getting behind on their mortgages, banks are still failing (118 so far this year), unemployment claims are edging back up - all signs that the last few quarters of growth was pure govt papering. Now that the support is being withdrawn the downturn is resuming. And I believe the Dems are going to get trounced this Fall so the possibility of more stimulus is diminishing by the day.

Instead of pendulums and dams, my analogy would be a boulder and a hill. The govt stopped the boulder halfway down the hill but the potential energy is still there. If there is sufficient strength in the economy it could be moved back up the hill but I don't see from where that energy would come. Most likely the govt support will continue wither and the boulder to continue it's move down the hill.

So that's the reason I'm not buying yet.

85   Cvoc13   2010 Aug 23, 1:24pm  

I like the analogy of the Bolder being on the hill, rather apt... Nicely done. With tomorrows data (existing housing sales likely to be down 16% consensus is 12.9-13.2 Bloomberg) I think its going to come in worse then that, 25% is my personal GUESS with revised GDP at .5 consensus is 1.4 I think jobless claims on friday.

I am thinking 535,000 and that will bring the stock market way way down, on any giving day this week if not all week.

But bottom line this weeks data is going to confirm what many of us have been saying all of last few months of 09 and all of 2010 and we have a lot more to go through. While none of us want that to be the case, when you stop and think about it, almost has to be. Unemployment headed higher, foreclosures, banks, etc... we are in a deep deep de-leveraging hole, that should take about 5-7 years total, and we are in year 2 of 7 and very few of these bulls will be super surprised to see where housing pricing in the BA for example so much lower, and destine to stay that way.

86   thomas.wong1986   2010 Aug 23, 2:45pm  

sybrib - we can hope. But as i recall also, the founder the Pet Rock, who came from Los Gatos did very well. Couple of guys from Santa Cruz made the first Wine Coolers, bright idea.

Pet Rock.. well he made a cool million on that ...

« First        Comments 81 - 86 of 86        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste