« First « Previous Comments 71 - 109 of 109 Search these comments
sybrib, Troy,
I live in a good part of east san jose too , wake up to chriping of birds and absolutely no problem BUT i use the good facilities available within 15 miles from me.My hospital is Good Sam, Don't have to goto eastridge mall , just drive little bit more to hit santana row. Agreed there is no WholeFoods nearby but i go shop at one in campbell/cupertino whenever i have to otherwise costco and the Trader's Joe work well for me and way cheaper.
I guess the only fly in the soup is schools here and I'm pretty sure there is money to be made by setting up a network of affordable private schools better than public one- Basically decouple zipcodes and education.
cloud13,
how connected are you to the community? It varies neighborhood by neighborhood, block by block, but some of the schools around here can be academic power houses for kids with the right ethic. You just really have to know your section.
One of my kids graduated from one of the K-12's here, the 2009 class had lots of kids going to the UC's, at least two that I know of went to Stanford, a handful to the Ivies; my kid got accepted to all the UC's except Berkeley and some of the lower tier ones my kid did not apply to. People I know who live in The Fortress may sneer when they learn where my kids went to K-12, but my partner and I have extra cash now to help pay for grad school when the time comes, because we did not flush it down the toilet for the privilege of going to K-12 with the highest API scores.
Another experience that will come in handy later in life is spending the K-12 experience with a broader slice of American culture instead of a Ghetto of grade grubbers.
When horribly overpriced meets horribly overpaid, you have an equilibrium
what happens when the pay goes down? like its been said before, nobody's getting rich off stock options anymore and the Apple and Google people have already made their money.
Thanks sybrib, that is good to know.
And on a side not , i got good options and was expected to make about 250K after toiling for 5 years but guess what i made close to 50K with my options and need to pay taxes on top of it. Even if a company goes to finish line, only a handful of VP's and Directors make money ......So the ability of this area to create rich people have diminished completely. There won't be too many buyers to pay the crapertino price.
Cloud,
Know your schools! Don't take it for granted that your kids have the opportunity to excel just because I said so, it depends on the precise elementary, middle and high school, as the East Side is highly variable.
But don't get obsessed with the API. That is an average or median or whatever, but it is not a good predictor of how an individual student will do, nor should it be.
Here’s the building.
http://used.realestate.yahoo.co.jp/bin/cdetail?rps=6&pf=13&md=key&key=%C6%EE%CB%E3%C9%DB&code=1125000101U1005
I clicked on the link and google translated it for me. Under the description of the "Current State" it says, "Has good shit." What does this mean, marble bathrooms? Or maybe a lazy listing agent? or one who wishes to get away from the "light, bright, gorgeous location" twaddle? [JK!]
not subscribing to pay TV
So, are nerds the only ones who know about OTA DTV broadcasts? I finally convinced a guy I know to hook up an antenna to his TV (just an indoor Radio Shack model, mind you); he canceled his Comcast the next day. Penny saved as they say...
there are a ton of live tv streaming online these days if you don't care about picture quality.
Under the description of the “Current State†it says, “Has good shit.â€
I see that too. That's funny! Normally 上物 means "quality merchandise" but in RE parlance it means there's a building on the lot.
But I don’t know where fortress prices are going. 15% down from here is possible I guess, but I wouldn’t count on it.
What is your metric to determine housing price? Please clarity it first. 15% of what? Median price? Price per sqft? Comps?
As you mentioned Palo Alto, I picked zipcode 94306.
Price per sqft dropped from $904 to $785 between 2008 summer and 2010 summer.
My favorite is of course, comparing the current sale/listing price with 2004-2008 sale prices.
Here one nice 3BR/2BA in Palo Alto: 3948 La Donna Ave
2006 purchase price: $1221K
Currently listed: $1190K
That's only 31K less, right?
But it is already 50+ days market with 2 price reductions. I don't think it will even sell above $1100K, it it sells at all. $1221K was 2006 price. I am pretty 2008 price for similar comps were much higher than $1.2M.
So I do see 10-15% drop (some area even more) already in some of these fortress areas.
Call me crazy, but I think prices in the fortress will actually drop back to 1998 prices, slowly, over the next decade. Very much like the Japan experience.
Things are still so crazy compared to rents that I know two families that dumped their houses in the area and are renting now, just to save the extra, oh, $3000 per month or so. They just can’t pass up that much money, while living in the same area and same quality house.
Patrick. When you say 1998. The rents should also fall back to that level. Isn't it?
No amount of real data is going to convince these guys. The myth of the Fortress is like a religion to them.
Call me crazy, but I think prices in the fortress will actually drop back to 1998 prices, slowly, over the next decade. Very much like the Japan experience.
Things are still so crazy compared to rents that I know two families that dumped their houses in the area and are renting now, just to save the extra, oh, $3000 per month or so. They just can’t pass up that much money, while living in the same area and same quality house.
Patrick. When you say 1998. The rents should also fall back to that level. Isn’t it?
I think rent in some parts are down to 98 levels inflation corrected. I think corporate housing is below 08 levels in absolute terms. When I moved to CA in 97 my company paid for a few months of corporate housing. I was shocked at how much it cost. It was like 2500/mo for a one bed room small furnished apt. A 2bd was like 3k according to my neighbors.
Call me crazy, but I think prices in the fortress will actually drop back to 1998 prices, slowly, over the next decade. Very much like the Japan experience.
Things are still so crazy compared to rents that I know two families that dumped their houses in the area and are renting now, just to save the extra, oh, $3000 per month or so. They just can’t pass up that much money, while living in the same area and same quality house.Patrick. When you say 1998. The rents should also fall back to that level. Isn’t it?
I think rent in some parts are down to 98 levels inflation corrected. I think corporate housing is below 08 levels in absolute terms. When I moved to CA in 97 my company paid for a few months of corporate housing. I was shocked
Good point. I just did the math on my rent in 1998. $675 1 BR unit. It now rents now $950. That comes to 3% YOY increase. Does this seem in line with inflation?
What is your metric to determine housing price? Please clarity it first. 15% of what?
uh, Selling Price?
Let's take this random house on the market:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3001-Bryant-St-Palo-Alto-CA-94306/19504084_zpid/
Here's the 10 year history:
In the current interest rate environment it wouldn't surprise me to see this house get beat down to the 2003 level.
Should 3% interest rates become available, we should see an upswing in the value. If bad things happen and interest rates hit 8%, we're probably in a wage-price spiral and $1M will soon be the bid on EPA homes, just like the 1970s-80s inflation added a 0 onto home prices.
There were plenty of people that got rich before the bubble, IBM, HP, the old Apple, Cisco, Yahoo, etc etc. hence the price premium compared to the rest of the country. The bubble portion of the price must drop just like every other part of the country.
Its rather a myth that public companies were given out stock options before 2000. I have known lots of Apple folks all the way back to early 80s and they are not rich by any measure. Many are still struggling today and cant afford not having a job today. Stock options were more common with small pre-public companies, where a handfull went public, 1 out of 5. However since SO need to be expensed and many SV got stung with 'Back Dating Scandal" such practice has been replaced with "restrictive options".
Google itself had to reprice its many "restrictive stock options" since many were underwater... worthless.
Here’s the 10 year history:
It would be nice to have 20-25 years... we been in a bubble well over 10 years now.
I think rent in some parts are down to 98 levels inflation corrected. I think corporate housing is below 08 levels in absolute terms. When I moved to CA in 97 my company paid for a few months of corporate housing. I was shocked at how much it cost. It was like 2500/mo for a one bed room small furnished apt. A 2bd was like 3k according to my neighbors
Lots of money floating around from private funding-VCs. So companies were burning cash like toliet paper. Rents did decline by 30% after 2000-2001 and so did corporate housing costs.
Demand was cut severly.
There were plenty of people that got rich before the bubble, IBM, HP, the old Apple, Cisco, Yahoo, etc etc. hence the price premium compared to the rest of the country. The bubble portion of the price must drop just like every other part of the country.
Its rather a myth that public companies were given out stock options before 2000. I have known lots of Apple folks all the way back to early 80s and they are not rich by any measure. Many are still struggling today and cant afford not having a job today. Stock options were more common with small pre-public companies, where a handfull went public, 1 out of 5. However since SO need to be expensed and many SV got stung with ‘Back Dating Scandal†such practice has been replaced with “restrictive optionsâ€.
Google itself had to reprice its many “restrictive stock options†since many were underwater… worthless.
Restricted stock options? I've only heard of restricted stock units (RSUs) basically stock grants that gets vested. Much less potential for gains but you are sure to make SOME money unless stock price drops to 0.
uh, Selling Price?
Let’s take this random house on the market:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3001-Bryant-St-Palo-Alto-CA-94306/19504084_zpid/
Here’s the 10 year history:
Great! Your chart itself demonstrates that prices are down quite a bit. For that specific home, 2009 value was around $1.15M. Now it is above $1M. What is your rational that it trend will not continue?
I think corporate housing is below 08 levels in absolute terms.
Oops I meant 98 levels
Much less potential for gains but you are sure to make SOME money unless stock price drops to 0.
Yes, you can make some money but they are adjusted based on some conditional performance.
def:
Restricted stock, also known as letter stock or restricted securities, refers to stock of a company that is not fully transferable until certain conditions have been met. Upon satisfaction of those conditions, the stock becomes transferable by the person holding the award.
At what point do you finally realize it is not possible to know the future? By the way, did you all know the Titanic is unsinkable?...oh wait a minute....
lets just keep that train of thought going and ask: why won't rent in Fremont go down? Just because a scenario sounds too terrible to YOU doesn't mean it won't happen. 50% of $1.5mil is still $750k, much more then a tract home in Fremont is going to cost ie $200-300k.
Nothing would surprise me at this point. There may be unprecedented government intervention, propping prices up forever or there may be half-assed intervention, or they run out of bullets and everything goes to shit. Lets keep in mind if mark to market wasn't suspended, every single bank who holds a mortgage business would be insolvent right now.
And why would these rich investers want to buy homes that would drop, as you say "as much as 20%" if they can safely make money in a bank account? Who's going to manage and maintain these individual homes? that sounds pretty damn expensive and labor intensive to me.
lets just keep that train of thought going and ask: why won’t rent in Fremont go down?
Two years back you could not find this kind of rental below $3000 in Monta Vista neighborhood. Yes, rental price has gone down already.
it won't require an all out collapse to cause 50% decline. It just means price going back to pre-bubble levels just like its neighbors. Not very hard to believe since the world operated fine before the bubble.
it won’t require an all out collapse to cause 50% decline. It just means price going back to pre-bubble levels just like its neighbors. Not very hard to believe since the world operated fine before the bubble.
That would burst all the "get rich quick" myths regarding the Bay Area many have been led to believe.
Quick poll: Anyone who invested in re during the past 2 years are glad they did it? If so, why?
A quick back of the envelope REO ratio calculation for Lafayette; there is approximately 1 house in some state of foreclosure (NOD, NOTS, bank-owned) for every 2 homes for sale (56 to 115). That amount of distress should help keep the sellers honest...
Looks to me that even the best got hit pretty hard... avg decline near $1M in HB.
The figures in the reports imply that higher-value properties were in faster decline, as can be seen in Atherton's numbers. In 2008, the total assessed reduction in values was almost $121 million on 131 properties in the wealthy town. In 2009, only 59 properties were reassessed, but the reduction was even larger at $125 million. Hillsborough, the other small and wealthy enclave in the county, tells the same story: 2008 saw 164 properties reassessed downward by $106 million, but in 2009, 124 properties were dropped by $148 million...
From Another parcel tax may be coming for Lafayette School District
Lafayette residents voted in 2007 to increase the district's current parcel tax from $132 to $313, with 3 percent annual increases.
Residents of the Acalanes Union High School District pay $301 yearly for two parcel taxes, both approved within the past year.
By my estimate, these folks are still 'underpaying' on their parcel taxes (though the 3% annual increase is impressive).
Price to income is the key.
Interest rates are ~half what they were 10 years ago . . . that really helps the "affordability" part.
lending standards have tightened up. Interest rates won't stay low forever.
As to whether it will drop to 1995 levels? I don’t know because I don’t have income/price levels back to those levels. I do know that back in 1997 when I came to the area, the economy was roaring, people were getting bonuses left and right, interns were getting free cars, furnish apts, and a fat salary. I don’t think “house price to income†ratio dropping down to 1998 would be so hard to imagine, in fact it is inevitable.
All thanks to investor money from VCs from 1998-2000. To the tune of $150B made many folks feel rich. But then by mid 2000 to 2001 it pretty much dried up and so went the salaries and bonus. There was too much money chasing too few good ideas.
You will find details on PWCmoneytree.com Left hand side.. Historical Trend Data.
I disagree, I think we will in fact see 1997 or back to 1993 type prices in all of these areas. Might take until 2014 or so, but when the trickle down goes up to those 6 figure incomes types and knocks them down. Now of course there are PRIME properties, one off's I am not talking about those those are the exception not the rule. I do in fact expect to major declines as I have said before why. But what they heck we all have our own thoughts, and frankly none of us has a crystal ball (I don't anyway) But I feel strongly at least.
Wow - talk about delusional. What the hell was wrong with these people?
The tiger moms will take flamethrowers and burn down homes until the demand makes the prices go back up again.
« First « Previous Comments 71 - 109 of 109 Search these comments
testing it