patrick.net

Here's a "work-out" program even people here could love:

Have the lenders/MBS note-holders agree to re-write the underwater loans setting the PRINCIPAL owed at 35¢ on the dollar. That is, if the mortgage is for $800,000, a typical price for your average 900sft L.A. shitbox, it's now instantly downsized to $280,000. Wages/rents & prices are now suddenly aligned, they're still paying on the loan, and nobody got evicted --win, win, right? Oh, and that new price gets recorded as a "new sale" in the MLS, so it becomes the neighborhood comp.

I'll buy THAT for a dollar!

Actually... by 1099'n the borrower for the to-the-penny amount forgiven it would offset his MID pretty much for the life of the loan.

Now... we're not taking away your MID! No, no. You're still getting it (you're just not getting any b-e-n-e-f-i-t out of it) It would further work out in that we'll have created (2) seperate classes of homeowners. Those that acted responsibly and are allowed full application of their MID and those that uh... aren't getting those great tax benefits!

I like it.

Nice addendum, DinOR! Makes a fine "work-out" plan even better (and karmically just to boot). Only downside is some FBs will scream "Don't 1099 me, bro!" But, hey, no government "gift" is 100% free, right?

Now all we need is a Lobbyist to draft it up for us in legalese and send --along with a campaign 'contribution' check with lots of zeros-- to Sacramento.

I think HelloKitty got it nailed. The whole Mr. Freeze scam is there to make underwater homedebtors keep making payments even though rationally they should just cut their losses and walk.

It's perfectly legal. Just ask anyone that's had to "income tax average". Sure, you'll get some huge write-off's this... year and with any luck they'll... mostly offset what you ALREADY owed! Notice I said m-o-s-t-l-y. Had they paid everything they owed on the day it was owed, there wouldn't be all those penalties and interest etc.

At that point it's between the Fed's and the state to tally up who gets what where Mr. FB's now non-existent MID is concerned.

Its hilarious to imagine that Countrywide would ever do anything to 'help' people unless it helped them more. Especially NOW when they have one foot in the grave.

Anyway there are standards for workouts and they are open to lawsuits and investor approval for any 'breaks' they give borrowers.

I hope there are class action attorneys reading and tracking all the 'happy giving away free money' statements these lenders are making. So when the losses mount they can use these as more leverage in court and say "look judge here is a record of countrywide giving away my investors money FREE! Clear breach of fidciary duty and contract!!"

justme,

I'll agree. For the most part the avg. FB is so ridiculously under water it isn't funny. As others have noted, when the RE mkt. was rock n' roll no one was too very interested in helping out recently divorced gals clinging to a home in a "hot" neighborhood.

But the HomeOwned have been making payments using their credit cards anyway, even at frozen rates they're all about to lose their $7 an hour jobs at Target, so if they were smart they'd sell-sell-sell and get the hell out.

Income and outgo must be at least on nodding terms.

They can cut their payments down to 1/3 maybe 1/4 by renting.

Where I am living now I can do better making $40 a day (hope I can snag that gig) at the local laundromat than I could ever do making well, I was up around $80k gross, in Silly-con valley.

I must say that the housing crash was A LOT more fun to watch before I realized the government would bail out banks and wall street with my funds, buy junk loan with my funds, and on top of that devalue the dollar massively as fast as they can.

Right now they’re in a pitched battle for their very survival so their actions (I believe) are more guided by a day-to-day decision making level.

DinOR,

Agreed. CFC's agreement to this lame-brain scheme just demonstrates the dire straits they are in. I think we should start a pool on (a) whether CFC will end up bankrupt/out of business, and (b) if so, when.

I'll start with yes, August 08 (after the 08 wave of ARM resets hits full stride).

Yeah, what HelloKitty said. Keep 'em making payments no matter what, talk 'em into just one more payment, just one more, and you're that much ahead before they walk away.

In 2004 I had a cell phone. It was $50 a month and I hardly used the thing. I never carried it, and in fact used the pay phone more than I used it. So, I called 'em up and wanted to end the plan - well, I was past the end of the plan and could just stop making payments at any time, but those bastards kept me paying 2 extra months before I caught on. I've not owned a cell phone since. I'll keep one for the 911 service if needed, and I have pay phones, borrow someone's phone, and ham radio if I want to talk to someone and I'm not at the house. I've kind of pledged to not give the cell phone co's another thin dime.

This is the same kind of thing the mortgage companies are doing - they KNOW you'll walk away because they know at least as much about your finances as you do, and they know you'll HAVE to walk away. In fact they know the sooner you stop paying 'em and keep the money in your pocket and go live in a Super-8 the better off you are. So from where they stand right now, if they can keep the sucker payments going for another month or another 6 months, it's just that much better for them than your just walking away.

@skibum,

Even Jane Wells of CNBC (very serious journalist) is expressing extreme doubt on CFC. I've been there and you're mind isn't racing. You're numb. You'll latch on to any "throw away phrase" you can get your hands on just so people will STFU.

Right now the mort. industry "thinks" they know what pain is. They have no idea.

I remember working in loss mitigation this one time a guy pissed me off by breaking so many payment arrangements. He would waffle between 90/120 days late (foreclosure dept would take over after 120 days late. But it never went to foreclosure because he would always send 2 payments and get back to 60 days late, then no money for 2 months and repeat.

So this one time he missed the deadline again and I had another 120 day delinq in my portfolio. So I mailed him back his 2 payments uncashed and sent his loan to the foreclosure department(yes the can do that sometimes! he was pulling my numbers down every month!) but they kicked it out of foreclosure when he called my supervisor and complained about me being a robot with no heart. (which is true of course, but the real reason they didnt foreclose was he sent money)

The bank only wants to foreclose if they absolutely have to, I was being selfing of course. He refused all the usual advice to catch up (sell your crap, get second job, take on roomate, borrow from some other chump, etc) and that pissed me off. There is no excuse to be 2 months late chronically, really if you want to keep the home sell your car and drive a junker to catch up your mortgage. Damn FB's.

HK,

Totally funny story. Yer' thinkin' this guy had learnt ta' milk the system just a little? I know my younger brother was 1 month behind for a whole year once. He'd recently become a single parent and without the extra income and 2 kids it was tough, but he got caught up.

What is different about this crash and its a MONUMENTAL difference is the dollar amounts involved now are staggering on every single home. Back in 96 a typical distressed borrower paid about 200k in late 80's and the home was worth 150k in the mid 90's foreclosure boom. 50k underwater (usually much less, that is the 'worst case') seemed like financial armageddon and 'ruined forever' to these people.

And anyone undwater 200k back then was a doctor or famous movie star who paid 600+ for thier home. We forclosed on a lot of them. A 600k to 1m home was exclusively for the wealthy back then. Today its for janitors, office workers, programmers, EVERYONE. There is simply NO WAY to ever recover from being 200k+ underwater - the old days of 20k upside being considered a disaster seem so silly and quaint now. But it was very very real, just 10 years ago people were upside 20k and getting mad at the bank, tearing out the counters and selling the toilets and walking away. for 20k. Being under 200-300k (which is probably average) will devastate the banks when they go to write off these losses after the foreclosures.

HelloKitty we *know* you're a robot, in fact you're a synthetic cute character invented under the name Sanrio, Sanrio because it's a word inoffensive and generally cute under all the major languages.

I love HelloKitty stuff!

Now, I like the neologism "selfing" but you should use it as in, you're "being selfish" or you "are selfing". I like that. Selfing. And I would advise the horrible, smelly, white-trash, deadbeat, El Camino-drivin', t'baccy-chawin' LOSER to just bail and I mean right away. Leave the banksters and RealtWhores hanging, or, hangin'.

There's no excuse to be 2 months late for a year, get out NOW and save your skins, rent a trailer or no-tell-hotel room and starve the oligarchy out.

If Carhartts and stray-cat stew are the path to freedom, then that path we should follow!

Yep Kitty I'm old enough to remember when $20k underwater was considered horrible, HORRIBLE.

Now $200k under is the new Little Black Dress.

I've managed to get $100k under and not even been owned by a house, just a small biz. And it may be $200k by the time they're done with the imaginary numbers on paper pertaining to me.

FB's certainly were casual about MEW'ing out 100-200k? Now they're walking away from it. See? Real... casual-like.

Perhaps folks in the mid-90's were exaggerating a bit, but it's definitely a set back. In my case to be "down" 200k my place would have to given away by the bank for free. So if they're giving it away, well then why not me?

This is illegal under some antitrust laws namely the Robinson Patman Act. It is illegal for a business to give preferential treatment to certain customers in a similar class; meaning that the opportunity for the lower rates is not available to everyone in the group no matter how the group is defined. This is so outrageous I hope it leads to some sort of revolt. I literally am shaking I'm so angry.

I want a recall NOW!

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.

Thanks for:

- MEW
- FBs
- Alan Greenspan
- Hank Paulson
- Ben Bernanke
- David Learah/Lawrence Yun
- Hedge Funds
- America's debt addiction
- Realtors
- Shady mortgage brokers
- Goldman/Merrill/Lehman/Bear Stearns/Citi/WAMU/WF/CFC
- Angelo Mozilo
- Casey Serin

Harm says

Have the lenders/MBS note-holders agree to re-write the underwater loans setting the PRINCIPAL owed at 35¢ on the dollar. That is, if the mortgage is for $800,000, a typical price for your average 900sft L.A. shitbox, it’s now instantly downsized to $280,000.

If that counts as a "sale," would it give a new lower Prop 13 basis?

Happy Thanksgiving Skibum and all.

@skibum,

You forgot the "no" before "thanks" ;-)

Happy Turkey Day everyone!

As inept and beholden to special interests as Schwarzenegger, he would have to do something really amazingly idiotic, like let the lights get turned off for the whole state, before he would get recalled.

It will be amusing to see where he is going to raise $10B, which is going to be the budget shortfall next year. Maybe he will try and raise some more bonds, after promising last time to cut up the credit card. That is my guess.

Driving home late tonight, I heard an ad on the local AM radio for some chap who will "help you eeeliminate debt". Any idea what this scam is?

I have heard it before on KCBS radio while driving. I am pretty sure it is some sort of slick scam, just curious what the angle is.

SP those "eeeeliminate debt" ads have been on the radio in the Bay Area for years. Because the Bay Area is so Special.

It's sure to be a scam.

I'm sure it's the standard debt-consolidation con, you send 'em money and ostensibly they're paying off your creditors, in reality they take your money'n'run. After the Statute Of Limitation (only 4 years in California) you're free and clear.

I myself have what I view as massive money problems and even I'm not dumb enough to fall for their ploy.

hmm, gummint 'intervention' at last... I'm not opposed to the intent of the intervention, in fact in my utopia there would be a hell of a lot more intervention in housing and a lot sooner. There used to be a time, so I'm told, when mortgage interest rates were fixed low by govt fiat (although you had to go cap in hand to the bank and they were very prudent), before they were deregulated and starting offering ARMs...

I've just added a post at the top of my blog on some suggestions for lowering housing prices, it's hopelessly naive and good for a laugh... although the Labor Party here is now looking at doing cost-controlled development on ex-gummint and Defence land, one of my suggestions...

TOB,

Good call. Securitization appears to be a general method for getting paid now, before the shit hits the fan at a later time.

In this particular case, where does this sudden interest in infrastructure projects come from? Was it the Minnesota bridge that fell down, or is there something systemic going on that the general public has not caught on to yet. My guess is that there is,

Related: It always bothered me that there were private contractors out in force driving piles into the bottom of the bay (for the new SF Bay Bridge) before the ink was even dry on any contract to build the new bridge. This project was really railroaded, if you ask me, I bet someone on this blog has some insights on what happened there...

Thank you gov!
Cost of money is higher than
the revenue on loans the banks
are bringing in...LOL
Arnold will be able to claim he destroyed
all of the CA banking single handedly...

ex-sunnyvale-renter Says:
I’m sure it’s the standard debt-consolidation con

That's what I first thought, but the ad actually says "we don't consolidate debt, we eeeeliminate it"... which is why I am very curious wtf their angle is.

BTW, one of their 'testimonials' says he will be able to pay off his 15-year mortgage in two years.

ex-sunnyvale-renter Says:
I’m sure it’s the standard debt-consolidation con

That’s what I first thought, but the ad actually says “we don’t consolidate debt, we eeeeliminate it”… which is why I am very curious what their angle is.

I apologize for going OT, particularly as this thread has remained so very much on.

I've seen two or three stories in the past several hours regarding the lending freeze in China. One of the likely outcomes is repatriation of dollars to the US. As there are some here involved in FX, I thought I should send a heads-up.

Back on topic, the HARM workout protocol with DinOR's refinement is just absolutely admirable. The irony is that lenders would quite possibly come out of your plan better off than they will on their present trajectory. Nice work, guys!

Malcolm-

www.teaparty07.com

I wonder if Marina Prime has a comment on this:

http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2007/11/when_good_comps_go_bad_in_the_marina.html

It looks like even people in the Marina will need a payment freeze...

"anon" strikes me as a great Marina Prime candidate. Avoiding a permanent nickname is his style; after all, what's to do when your predictions keep crashing into the bay?

Or "fluj". Definitely the RE cheerleader type...

SP Says:

> Driving home late tonight, I heard an ad on the local
> AM radio for some chap who will “help you eeeliminate
> debt”. Any idea what this scam is?

The ad I hear a lot on AM radio in the Bay Area is not a scam per se, but is just a program that gives simple tips that many stupid Americans don’t know like “you should pay down your 18% credit card debt before the 8% HELOC” and “you can pay off a home mortgage years early by just making one extra payment a year”. It is kind of like an ad promising people an easy way to lose weight and eliminate fat forever that recommends "eating less and exercising more"…

HelloKitty Says:

> What is different about this crash and its a
> MONUMENTAL difference is the dollar amounts
> involved now are staggering on every single
> home. Back in 96 a typical distressed borrower
> paid about 200k in late 80’s and the home was
> worth 150k in the mid 90’s foreclosure boom.

In Southern Cal many homes that sold for ~$150K in the mid 80’s went to $300K in 1990, then back to $150K in 1995 (dropping $30K a year).

Here in the Bay Area many homes that sold for $300K in the mid 90’s went to $1.3mm in 2005. I think that we will have a lot more people running for the doors to rent if we get year over year drops of $100K+.

P.S. Like HK I was also working with bad (commercial) loans in the mid 90’s and would try to make a deal with guys that I liked who tried to work with me and played hardball (and tried to financially ruin) anyone who was an idiot and played games with me…

SP - by "eeeeeeliminate it" they mean they take your money while you wait out the California 4-year statute of limitations. Sure, if you have assets they can be seized/garnished, but you can always do a BK and maybe get out.

It's all very complicated and I feel like a young Lincoln "reading law" in the law library when I go into town, but that's the basic outline of how I think these outfits work.