0
0

Counterparty risk and bubble hedging


 invite response                
2007 Dec 20, 3:59am   19,717 views  94 comments

by HARM   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

While the sheer volume of bubble/hedge fund/MBS-CDO implosion stories appearing in the news daily nowadays, it can be difficult to pick out the "pearls" among the pebbles, or the truly extraordinary items from the mundane "yet another Wall Street multi-billion-dollar write-down". (Btw, amazing to see bubble implosion lead headlines every day on Bloomberg, MSNBC & CNNMoney, etc. compared to just 2-3 years ago, isn't it? Any long-timers remember Face Reality, Fake P, MarinaPrime, CuriousCat, DAiryQueen, etc. brushing off our concerns as Chicken Little, doomster hand-wringing?).

This one recently caught my eye, and stayed in the back of my mind (via Tanta with Calculated Risk):

“It’s a zero-sum game. If you put trades on that worked so well that you bankrupt your counterparty, you will not collect on those trades.”

--Jim Keegan, a senior vice president and portfolio manager at American Century Investments

I've often read MSM quotes from Wall Street outfit bigwigs (Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Chase, Citibank, etc.) to the effect that, "Even if all these MBSs/CDOs, derivatives, swap agreements & $Trillions in other financial Dark Matter go 'boom!', we're ok, dude. 'Cuz we, like, hedge 'n stuff."

Apparently, (if I'm reading Jim Keegan correctly), if your "insurance company" goes belly-up, then you "may" have a problem collecting on that insurance policy. So, I guess it comes down to a case of gambling --even on the bearish/short side-- is *still* gambling?

Am I interpreting this correctly?

Discuss, enjoy...
HARM

#bubbles

« First        Comments 12 - 51 of 94       Last »     Search these comments

12   DinOR   2007 Dec 20, 6:06am  

"The risk is spreading alright" LOL!

Good one Bear. Kind of like "the containment is spreading" but w/ a fresh new twist. I like it!

13   Peter P   2007 Dec 20, 6:10am  

“The risk is spreading alright” LOL!

Yet another reason for a bailout!

14   DinOR   2007 Dec 20, 6:13am  

Oh just to clarify (and please feel free to correct me) when WB was quoted in interviews about his concern for the growth in the use of derivatives I think most of us just kind of assumed he was talking about.... options, futures, options on futures and so on.

Does anyone here recall thinking to themselves back in '02 this pertained to credit default swaps etc? I know I sure didn't.

15   Richmond   2007 Dec 20, 6:17am  

What was it that Warren called "derivatives"? Oh yeah, I believe it was-"weapons of financial mass destruction".

16   skibum   2007 Dec 20, 6:23am  

DQ numbers for the Bay Area November are out.

http://dqnews.com/RRBay1207.shtm

17   DinOR   2007 Dec 20, 6:26am  

Richmond,

Yeah, I believe he DID say that. :) I'll see what I can't dig up. Even though WB sold his long held SoCal beach home around the peak, he insisted it was more about fundamentals and portfolio management than out of fear of a housing bubble. I don't ever recall a direct comment connecting the HB w/ WOFMD's?

18   OO   2007 Dec 20, 6:31am  

DQ: Bay Area home sales stuck at two-decade low; price picture mixed

Deep Freeze coming
http://www.dqnews.com/RRBay1207.shtm

19   OO   2007 Dec 20, 6:31am  

oops, skibum beat me to it

20   OO   2007 Dec 20, 6:36am  

Question: I am looking at foreclosure.com, there's a new tab called sheriff sale, what does it mean? Thanks.

21   Richmond   2007 Dec 20, 6:55am  

Isn't that where the Sheriff executes the forelosure sale in the front yard?
I don't think they do that in CA. Real estate pros say it takes their business.
I could be wrong, but that rings a bell.

22   justme   2007 Dec 20, 7:02am  

Man, I want to get myself one of them sheriff deals.

23   Peter P   2007 Dec 20, 7:03am  

Question: I am looking at foreclosure.com, there’s a new tab called sheriff sale, what does it mean? Thanks.

Perhaps it means that the persons or occupants had already been hauled out by the sheriff.

24   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 7:14am  

Perhaps it means that the persons or occupants had already been hauled out by the sheriff.

I sure hope not, because half the fun of buying a foreclosure is being there in person to see the look on the previous fliptard occupants' faces' as they get hauled off. :twisted:

25   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 7:16am  

“The risk is spreading alright”

Like my middle-aged a$$ after another round of holiday binging.

26   Peter P   2007 Dec 20, 8:24am  

In this example the Gov is the Lion, the RE-bailout is the Zebra, and we be the grass.

At least we are "renewable." ;)

27   DennisN   2007 Dec 20, 8:35am  

Yes, Peter, but we also are the "poopees".

28   EBGuy   2007 Dec 20, 8:37am  

DQ: Bay Area home sales stuck at two-decade low; price picture mixed
Median price is up 1.5% year over year. Come on folks, remember, a rising median rasises all boats -- or something like that.
Paging Prince Prospero, you're wanted in the green room.

29   ColoradoBear   2007 Dec 20, 8:46am  

I don't know exactly what Warren Buffett had in mind as derivatives but if anything fits it's the whole CDO, CDS CLO markets. It's hard to tell what's in them, there's no standard method for valuing them, and there's no standard of accounting for that value. And yet, the numbers are counted as if they were cash on hand. Until the contract is ultimately settled both parties can book a profit. Money from thin air!

Warren Buffett on Derivatives:
http://www.fintools.com/docs/Warren%20Buffet%20on%20Derivatives.pdf

Buffett's observations in the final paragraph are quite prescient in light of the current situation.

30   StuckInBA   2007 Dec 20, 8:53am  

What's wrong with DQ ? Deep freeze and stuff. But fortunately, the indicators are moving in different directions.

Different than where they want to be. But all in their different ways pointing to the same direction.

31   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 9:06am  

Latest nominee for bleeding-heart media "victim" sob story of the year!:

http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=73045

Just loved the whole "2nd generation illegal immigrant", "homeless renter" tent city thing --very Hooverville-ish. Got the MSM "American Dream/victim" boilerplate down pat. They even managed to fit in a quick stat on foreclosures without even once mentioning the possible reasons WHY these people were being foreclosed on!

Bravo, Reuters!

32   Peter P   2007 Dec 20, 9:08am  

What is a 2nd generation illegal? Did their parents go outside of the country for childbirth just so that the kids can remain illegal?

33   StuckInBA   2007 Dec 20, 9:11am  

DinOR :

I definitely was not aware of what CDO and related alphabet soup when I read about WB's comment about derivatives. Even now I am trying to wrap my mind around the figures being thrown. For example Mish's post about 681 Trillion being the size of derivatives. This is magnitudes bigger than the size of the global economy. Someday I might understand how the hell this can happen.

34   StuckInBA   2007 Dec 20, 9:22am  

Another thing I noticed today on CR was also talked in the blogsphere long time ago. Now banks are afraid that the stigma of losing the home will no longer be there. Financially, it will be a smart move for many people to simply walk away. And it will become kind of fashionable as well.

It was long time ago that I remember someone (TxChick) saying "Broke is the new black".

35   Malcolm   2007 Dec 20, 9:28am  

Bush just signed into law a bailout bill aimed at removing taxes from debt forgiveness relating to foreclosure or refinancing. Let the flood gates open, now there is no incentive for hanging on to a house or any penalty for walking away from it.

36   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 9:40am  

What is a 2nd generation illegal? Did their parents go outside of the country for childbirth just so that the kids can remain illegal?

:lol: I was mainly referring to her parent's (likely) status, but yeah, point taken.

37   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 9:43am  

Q for all you Aussies, Kiwis, Canadians, Brits & other nationalities out there: Do children of illegal immigrants get automatic residency/citizenship in your country too?

38   Peter P   2007 Dec 20, 9:49am  

Q for all you Aussies, Kiwis, Canadians, Brits & other nationalities out there: Do children of illegal immigrants get automatic residency/citizenship in your country too?

Brits: No. Mother must be settled at the time of birth.

39   Malcolm   2007 Dec 20, 9:51am  

Ha ha, and the latest boomer folly, it turns out that those fine art TV auctions were selling fake paintings. Hope none of you guys paid $3,000 for one of those fake $90,000 Salvador Dalis. God what is it with these people?

Ok, I know the boomers used to ditch economics class because it was teaching evil concepts or you just wanted to smoke pot. In either case, if something is worth $90,000 in a normal market you are not going to just pick it up for $3,000 on a nationally telivised auction. It is just a reocurring theme with these people, it is charged on a credit card, so it is like the money doesn't demand the same care.

40   Malcolm   2007 Dec 20, 9:53am  

Aparantly this fraud was 6 billion dollars a year. Who cares though? It is just debt.

41   EBGuy   2007 Dec 20, 9:54am  

Malcolm, I couldn't believe that Bush actually signed "Don't 1099, Bro" into law, so I had to check the AP feed myself. Maybe I shoud consider a temporary change in career to "short sale specialist". I have to admit it becomes a no brainer for the seller -- at least before it was challenging: jingle mail (ruined credit but no tax consequences) or short sale (keep credit but pay IRS for debt forgiveness). Oh well, I'm sure there's enough people with seconds to make life interesting. Actually this is an area where a savy "short sale specialist" could come in handy: how to divide the debt foregiveness so that the first and second lien holders find it acceptable (get the second to accept pennies on the dollar as they get zip if foreclosed).

And it will become kind of fashionable as well.
Especially if you were being "held hostage" by the bank with an ARM reset and can now rent for 1/3 the price. What's not to like...

42   EBGuy   2007 Dec 20, 9:59am  

Malcolm, I couldn’t believe that Bush actually signed “Don’t 1099, Bro” into law, so I had to check the AP feed myself. Maybe I shoud consider a temporary change in career to “short sale specia1ist”. I have to admit it becomes a no brainer for the seller — at least before it was challenging: jingle mail (ruined credit but no tax consequences) or short sale (keep credit but pay IRS for debt forgiveness). Oh well, I’m sure there’s enough people with seconds to make life interesting. Actually this is an area where a savy “short sale specia1ist” could come in handy: how to divide the debt foregiveness so that the first and second lien holders find it acceptable (get the second to accept pennies on the dollar as they get zip if foreclosed).

And it will become kind of fashionable as well.
Especia1ly if you were being “held hostage” by the bank with an ARM reset and can now rent an equivalent house (on the same block) for 1/3 the price. You come off looking like a genius...

43   Malcolm   2007 Dec 20, 10:08am  

While I have a different strategy, I totally agree that now there is nothing to stop a mass exodus of sellers. On principle I don't believe a non recourse loan should ever carry a tax liability for debt forgiveness but without understanding specifics it seems like this law lets everyone, including the cash out people, walk away. Taking cash out and not paying it back should always be viewed as debt forgiveness, there is absolutely no reason to not tax that income. Evidently in this country we tax the shit out of hard work but larsony is now a tax shelter.

44   OO   2007 Dec 20, 10:13am  

Canada is the only other country than US that recognizes citizenship by birth.

EU plugged the hole years ago, with Ireland being the last. I think Ireland closed the loophole a couple of years ago because I read something about illegal immigrants rushing to Ireland to give birth before the deadline to acquire an EU passport for their kids.

Oz plugged the hole in the 90s. At least one parent has to be a PR in order for the kid to be born as an Aussie.

Canada and us are the only fools standing.

45   anonymous   2007 Dec 20, 12:11pm  

At least one parent has to be a Puerto Rican in order for the kid to be born as an Aussie?

Weird.

46   Malcolm   2007 Dec 20, 12:14pm  

IMO they should be citizens. The term natural born citizen only has the criteria of birth in this country. Also, since the constitution is being cited, one of the rights afforded is that no person shall answer for the crimes of another. I haven't seen anyone assert a point based in law or even morally cohesive as to why someone born in a country is not automatically a citizen.

47   B.A.C.A.H.   2007 Dec 20, 12:47pm  

stuckinBA:

about those bloggers having more incite than bankers, investors, economists...

The much deeper problem is nothing new, it's just showing up in what seems like a new place to you (and really, it's not that new of a place. Remember the real estate bubble that popped in 1990? Tech bubble? Enron? Arthur Burns-authored inflation? Different bubbles, same kinds of elite bankers, investors, economists...)

all those elite business schools either dumbed them down or trained them very well in malfeasance, probably it was a little bit of both.

There's someone who posts on here that graduated from Haas who shares a lot of insight, and it's clear from what he shares that he learned that stuff in the school of the Real World. Not Haas.

48   B.A.C.A.H.   2007 Dec 20, 12:58pm  

OO:

I'm really getting sick and tired of being punished for being a citizen by beeing obliged for jury duty in a county where one in four is not a citizen.

I have said so during the jury selection when the defendant was a Mexican, in order to get excused.

49   Brand165   2007 Dec 20, 1:01pm  

Malcolm says: The term natural born citizen only has the criteria of birth in this country. Also, since the constitution is being cited, one of the rights afforded is that no person shall answer for the crimes of another. I haven’t seen anyone assert a point based in law or even morally cohesive as to why someone born in a country is not automatically a citizen.

What about the reverse? An illegal immigrant can effectively have their crime forgiven by birthing a child on U.S. soil. The child is a citizen, and since they are too young to care for themselves, their parent(s) get to stay. Such a low standard for citizenship encourages people to break the law. And they aren't doing it just for the kid's benefit---they are breaking the law for their own benefit, too.

50   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 1:06pm  

Also, since the constitution is being cited, one of the rights afforded is that no person shall answer for the crimes of another. I haven’t seen anyone assert a point based in law or even morally cohesive as to why someone born in a country is not automatically a citizen.

I'll go along with this argument, provided that:
Said parents don't automatically qualify for legal residency just for "dropping anchor" on U.S. soil. If this means child must be raised by adoptive U.S. parents, or *gasp* parents must return to country of origin and apply for legal residency to be reunited with their children, then so be it. Otherwise, automatic residency-by-proxy (the "anchor baby") becomes just another legal loophole to be exploited.

51   HARM   2007 Dec 20, 1:08pm  

And what Brand said ;-).

« First        Comments 12 - 51 of 94       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste