Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
you need to update your stats. the neo-cons are now responsible for getting 4,000 Americans killed, 200,000 Iraqis killed, displacing 4.5M Iraqis (read: refugees), and creating the perfect training ground for Al-Qaeda. nice work. and maybe you should add an Iran page in case McCain is elected. thanks for providing a great site!
Good illustration of the Saudi educational system continuing to teach hate:
http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/CRF_SaudiReport_2006.pdf
Legacy Media Now Calls US Destruction of Iraq "..one of the greatest blunders in American military history," blames it for rise of Trump, and asks if US has "learned the lessons."
YES, we have and it is this: Not to believe a WORD from mass media/military industrial complex. Not one word. This is the only "lesson." The destruction of Iraq was called "Nation Building."
The accusations against Iraq were 100% false and the administration knew it.
The accusations against Ukraine/US seem to be true.
At least Bush and Co had decency to level their "bioWEAPONSlabs" accusation BEFORE the attack and gave the accused a chance to allow inspections and not 2-3 months into the war.
Patrick says
The accusations against Iraq were 100% false and the administration knew it.
The accusations against Ukraine/US seem to be true.
???
I'm not following or tracking the news these days. What's going on with the accusations?
“During the lead up to the War on Iraq, I was working in DC and knew a woman who was married to a guy at the state department. Long before the vote in Congress, she told me that it was already decided and that the war was definitely happening. So, that vote was just for the sheep to make it look like we were still living under representative government. The truth is that America has been owned by the central bankers since 1913 and the Federal Reserve Act--the bankers run the govt and the rest is just an illusion. ...
“Here's ex-Secretary of Labor, Robert Reisch, under the Clinton Administration admitting the truth:
https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=SecretCabal&C=8.0
“Robert Reich understands the current power structure of the U.S. because he was a Rhodes Scholar. He is a member of the CFR, and he was Secretary of Labor during the Clinton Administration. Robert Reich's January 7, 1999, article in USA Today states:
"The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress have become irrelevant . . . in case you hadn't noticed, America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Board. . . Congress is out of the loop. Every so often, some senators or house members politely ask Greenspan to visit and talk about the economy . . . Then he goes back down to the Fed and runs the country. . . . America's foreign policy is being run by the IMF (Int'l Monetary Fund) . . . and when the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress."
I do remember Iraq attacked and took over Kuwait. That was the reasoning for the overthrow of Sadam. They would not pull out.
I do remember Iraq attacked and took over Kuwait. That was the reasoning for the overthrow of Sadam. They would not pull out.
If Glaspie just said "if you do this, it will be war with the United States", it wouldn't have happened.
richwicks says
If Glaspie just said "if you do this, it will be war with the United States", it wouldn't have happened.
Maybe, but that's no excuse for the invasion.
Saddam could also simply have looked up the allied structures and treaties and figured out that Kuwait was a US partner/ally they would/should protect.
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. No funding, no training, no knowledge of it.
Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, just the ordinary weapons that we sold to them.
Iraqi “terrorists” who attack American soldiers are defending their country against an invading army. You would do the same.
Sunnis killing Shiites and Kurds is not why we invaded, and we’ve proven we’re no good at stopping that killing.
19 Saudis and 1 Egyptian attacked America, so America turns around and attacks … Iraq?
What was the point of invading Iraq? The victims of the Madrid and London bombings were no safer because of the invasion of Iraq. If we invaded Iraq to bring “democracy”, why don’t we invade Saudia Arabia, a country with no democracy, no freedom of speech, and no freedom of religion?
Could it have something to do with the great friendship between the Bush family and the Saudi royal family?
More than 2,000 American soldiers have died because Bush decided to invade Iraq. Bush caused 2,000 American soldiers to die, and at least 30,000 Iraqis.
We continue to send weapons and billions of dollars to Saudi Arabia, the source of Islamic terrorism and the source of the Bush family fortune.
You pay a lot more for gas now, and oil companies, Bush, and the Saudis are a lot richer than before the war.
And Osama is still free.