« First « Previous Comments 142 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
I'll buy a house the day it's cheaper than renting. For me, it's not even close yet. It's just so damn cheap to rent by comparison with owning in Menlo Park, and anyway, prices are still falling.
But I do admit it has turned around in a lot of cheaper places. You can actually buy houses in Antioch and parts of Oakland and rent them out for a tidy profit, if you can handle collecting the rent from people who are probably on the edge financially. And maybe armed.
True, I had not thought about it, but rents (and therefore property prices) would be lower without Section 8 type subsidies.
But you can't let families with young kids be homeless. We should take care of our fellow citizens at least that much. What's a better way to do it?
True, I had not thought about it, but rents (and therefore property prices) would be lower without Section 8 type subsidies.
But you can’t let families with young kids be homeless. We should take care of our fellow citizens at least that much. What’s a better way to do it?
No, of course not! People who can ill afford to have children should be subsidized by those who work for a living. 'Magically' squeezing out children should give you a free spot on the public trough. If welfare recipients want to have dozens of children (by god knows how many baby~daddys) they should be encouraged to do so because we 'can't let families with young kids be homeless'. 'We should take care of our fellow citizens at least by that much.' *rolly~eyes emoticon*
Peter P bought a house.
Almost as stunning as when surfer-x capitulated. Do you know the city where Peter P settled?
« First « Previous Comments 142 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
Judge Smales: "You'll get nothing and like it!"
Banks Lose to Deadbeat Homeowners as Loans Sold in Bonds Vanish
Some highlights:
"Lost-note Affidavits". Add that to "Bandos" as a nominee for best new bubble buzzword of the year.
HARM
#housing