0
0

Equity gains more than wiped out by equity loans


 invite response                
2008 Apr 2, 1:20am   28,684 views  317 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

dodo

From a reader:

Americans now own less than 50% of their home for the first time in many years. What I did not hear in the press is that this percentage was reported AFTER home values had increased astronomically. That is, as home prices shot upward, many Americans chased those zooming home prices by adding debt, not by rejoicing that they now owned a larger fraction of their home. To me, the story is not that Americans now own less than 50% of their home, but that this is true after home prices have skyrocketed in recent years, outstripped by debt rising even more rapidly. Consider the implications to baby boomers who hoped to retire soon, but who have already extracted a large fraction of the true equity in their homes and spent it.

This is pretty amazing. After the biggest runup in prices ever, owners managed to blow all of that equity, and then some. And now they've got rapidly declining prices on top of that.

Patrick

« First        Comments 121 - 160 of 317       Last »     Search these comments

121   sa   2008 Apr 3, 4:37am  

When we look back and see how much of our resources have been devoted to “vacation homes” it’ll turn our stomachs.

No kidding. I live in a small university town of 15000 people. When i came here like 8 years back, houses i saw were very old. Now, many of them have given way for expensive condos. Mostly as 2nd home or who knows 10th home for speculators. The median income for the town is around 28K and median price is around 280K. One of my friend started a restraunt here last year and he couldn't get a bid from any of the developers in town to get his interiors done. They were making so much money, they didn't even want to look at 150k work.

122   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 4:47am  

Another concept for people to wrap their heads around.

There's a big difference between being able to qualify for a mortgage, and actually being able to afford it.

123   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 4:50am  

Here's an interesting note from NRO on the fact that the liberals can't complain about the Fed since they are the ones who wanted one.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDNmMWFlMTZmNDdiYzRkZTk5NjY2ZTY0YWExYjNkMjY=

124   DinOR   2008 Apr 3, 4:52am  

sa,

Good point. With all that's been wasted on homes that barely see two weeks a year of actual use I'd forgotten about all the misallocated labor? All just to feed someones' vanity.

O.K I just came up with the definition of a vacation home!

"If you can't pee off the back porch without getting complaints, it ain't a vacation home, alright?" (It's a trophy home)

Enough already!

125   sa   2008 Apr 3, 5:46am  

two weeks sounds just about right. 6-8 football games.

126   Duke   2008 Apr 3, 6:16am  

The fact the market continues to rise on bad news just amazes me.

Here is my prediction:

In 6 weeks time (May 21) the Dow will drop below 11,500.
By years end it will drop Below 10,000.

127   sa   2008 Apr 3, 6:30am  

FED has been coming comes up with something, everytime DOW is around 12K. I don't know why they are so aggressive with equity prices.

128   northernvirginiarenter   2008 Apr 3, 6:35am  

Just today:

Google laying off 300.

ATA Airlines Bankrupt and shut, more airlines to follow.

CIT Group, one of the largest private student lenders, announces it is stopping student lending as of today.

Mortgage Rates creeping up, at 5.88% 30 FRM today.

Story in Reuters about homes being worth less than their copper pipes.

Fed players indicated a Bear collapse would have led to total finanical system meltdown.

Employment report expectations dismal, anticipated increase to 5% unemployed.

And yet, the stock market is climbing. Some might argue ugly has already been priced in; as transparency and unknowns become knowns confidence flows back in. I don't think so.

I completely agree Duke, we will be well below 10,000 Dow by end calendar year. Unless of course christmas season 2008 saves us all! The next holiday should be one for the books. Figure another 20% minimum median national RE price decline, another 15% off the stock market, maybe another 10% USD currency drop thrown in.

Public is already "reeling" from the whammy of equity and housing decline to date, along with soaring prices. Imagine what folks will be feeling when we finally hit those bottom numbers. Yikes.

We are witnessing nothing less than the most drastic standing of living decline in US history.

129   StuckInBA   2008 Apr 3, 6:42am  

I don’t know why they are so aggressive with equity prices.

To avoid cascading margin calls. All types of portfolios have been used as collateral. So a rapid decline in the value of the collateral can start a vicious circle pretty soon. For the same reason, Bernanke is appealing Congress to do something to stop the decline in house prices.

This is the problem with asset bubbles and their destruction.

130   sa   2008 Apr 3, 7:06am  

SIBA,

When things were blowing up in housing, fed came out and said things were contained. What i am trying to understand was, it didn't appear that fed was panicking when housing was deflating. They have been very agressive when the results started to show up in equities. If they understood the problem correctly, it should have been other way around.

131   OO   2008 Apr 3, 8:35am  

US is the world's 4th largest exporter of rice, after Thailand, Vietnam, India. However, recently Vietnam has put a ban on rice export due to shortage of supply internally, and India is having a serious crop failure.

The US ranks only 4th in rice export not because of supply constraints but because of competition from the other exporters. Most of the American rice is grown in California. If we don't have wacky weather leading to crop failure like India and Vietnam, this could be a very profitable year for American rice farmers because they can essentially charge whatever they want.

Just after the 30% rice hike about a week ago, there will be another co-ordinated 30% price hike on rice in China next month.

132   OO   2008 Apr 3, 8:37am  

Maybe we should stop thinking about buying a home, and pay more attention to Williamson Act land that is not being utilized for agriculture. Perhaps I can hire a few Latinos to grow rice for me :-)

133   OO   2008 Apr 3, 8:40am  

NVR,

Dow may not end up much lower because the massive printing action is about to start.

You ain't seen nothing yet when it comes to inflation. So far we are able to export our USD overseas, particularly to developing countries in Asia that are exchanging their work and raw materials for work, and eventually, food. When that link breaks, all the USD will come home to roost, plus the helicopter action of the Congress, not BB alone. So far it is only the beginning of monetary reflation, not at full scale yet. When we get to fiscal stimulus, that will be one hell of a reflationary effort.

134   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 8:42am  

I keep telling you, all we need do is band together with Canada, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia and form "OFEC" - the organization of food exporting countries.

135   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 8:53am  

Maybe we should stop thinking about buying a home, and pay more attention to Williamson Act land that is not being utilized for agriculture.

Good idea. I doubt grains are easy to grow in small scales though.

Perhaps I can hire a few Latinos to grow rice for me

Guest worker program is essential!

You ain’t seen nothing yet when it comes to inflation.

I am still not sure if the correction in gold price has completed. :(

136   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 8:54am  

I keep telling you, all we need do is band together with Canada, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia and form “OFEC” - the organization of food exporting countries.

I love that idea.

But how can the OFEC export food to non-OFEC countries without oil?

137   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 8:56am  

Rice is still going strong:

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=CBOT_RR.K08&v=d6

Again, futures investing is very risky.

138   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 9:25am  

easy, load those empty tankers with food for the trip home.

Yes! We will offer them a Food-for-Oil program. :)

139   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 9:27am  

OFEC could simply dictate some fractional parity between a barrel of oil and a bushel of wheat. Any tin-pot dictator we don't like....let them eat oil.

140   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 9:40am  

let them eat oil

LOL!

Oil is the new cake! :lol:

141   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 9:51am  

Working out a fractional parity between oil and wheat could take several forms AND it would de-couple any fiat currency effects.

For example, say a barrel of oil is X gallons and Y pounds. A bushel of wheat is W gallons and Z pounds. We could set fractional parity as A (X/W) or as B (Y/Z). And if anyone complains, we could point out that crude oil REALLY MEANS crude oil, as opposed to the finished product of wheat. Crude oil is pulled out of the ground for free after extraction costs. Wheat on the other hand requires BLUE GOLD (R), lots of farm labor, and processing along with the intellectual property value of the wheat strains.

142   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 10:02am  

Working out a fractional parity between oil and wheat could take several forms AND it would de-couple any fiat currency effects.

Free Market can work that out in fractions of a second.

143   DennisN   2008 Apr 3, 10:04am  

What "free market"? Last time I checked we didn't have such a thing.

Too bad. :(

144   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 10:06am  

Well, we can at least worship it. ;)

145   Brand165   2008 Apr 3, 10:24am  

I'll bet you all my gold that we can go without oil a lot longer than they can go without wheat, rice and corn. Fix the price... OFEC is a brilliant idea!

146   OO   2008 Apr 3, 10:28am  

Hey guys, let's not get ahead of ourselves yet.

Food cannot not easily monopolized until...we can come up with some kind of biological weapon that can wipe out other people's crops but not ours.

147   StuckInBA   2008 Apr 3, 10:43am  

sa :
What i am trying to understand was, it didn’t appear that fed was panicking when housing was deflating. They have been very agressive when the results started to show up in equities. If they understood the problem correctly, it should have been other way around.

Because the Fed doesn't care about the home prices at all. Say, if the home prices go to zero, but bank's collateral is protected by Govt. would Mr. Bernanke care about loanowners ? Fat chance. They are "banking" on the Congress to do exactly that for them. Which the congress is trying hard to do.

The Fed cannot go out and buy all the houses. But they can accept all the MBS sh1t they can, and they did exactly that.

The Fed is banker's personal bitch. It doesn't care about savers, not does it care about debtors. It only cares about banks. All types of banks - now it seems.

148   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 10:48am  

OO, other less-fortunate places do not have the same fertile land. They can surely try growing rice in a desert.

I think we will hit Peak Food though. LOL.

149   Brand165   2008 Apr 3, 11:15am  

If other places were on par with U.S. agriculture techniques, we wouldn't be exporting as much as we are today.

150   Busted   2008 Apr 3, 1:00pm  

NPR's Fresh Air program today is highly recommended to all interested in what caused this financial mess (for one, McCain's top economic advisor, Phil Graham's legislature that deregulated derivatives). Great interview on our "shadow financial system"

"Our Confusing Economy, Explained":

Perplexed by the U.S. economy? You're not alone. Law professor Michael Greenberger joins Fresh Air to explain the sub-prime mortgage crisis, credit defaults, the shaky future of other types of loans and what we can expect from the U.S. financial markets.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89338743

151   Randy H   2008 Apr 3, 1:04pm  

Hey, I am just trying to figure out if I need to bring my swim trunks to the housewarming party. We are invited… right?

Of course. I was already thinking of that. But I'll need to subscribe a couple of the tougher of this lot to act as bouncers in case any of the Zillow-psychos show up to rumble.

There are a lot of pools (as opposed to hot tubs) where we're looking now, though. So you know it's not Mill Valley so much anymore.

152   Busted   2008 Apr 3, 1:25pm  

from the Fresh Air interview: student loans, auto loans, credit cards, private equity firms "have all essentially followed the same template (as the subprime lending ways). it's as if a bunch of las vegas bookies started taking bets and never bothered to write them down or record them."

I have to say I agree with Duke's prediction of 11,500 by May 21st.

153   OO   2008 Apr 3, 1:26pm  

Randy, I am sure you already know this, but I am still gonna repeat anyway.

Propertyshark has quite a bit of time lag on recording and doesn't always record HELOC or second loans. However, county records do. You can search by names to see if someone is taking out a second loan or a HELOC on the current home. You can just use online recorder search to get an initial result. Then if you are nosy enough about the report, you can always pay up.

Sometimes the seller has "hidden" financial skeletons in the closet that may not be fully revealed by propertyshark. And a HELOC lender can prevent the house from going into a short sale in which the HELOC lender will be left with zilch.

154   Jimbo   2008 Apr 3, 2:28pm  

Hmm… more like Deliverance.

You mean like this trio?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/05/18/DIRTBIKE.TMP

There is definitely a part of the hills where you can go too far back and you end up back in the Wild Wild West.

155   EBGuy   2008 Apr 3, 2:38pm  

The Fed cannot go out and buy all the houses. But they can accept all the MBS sh1t they can, and they did exactly that.
I was wondering what Stuck was all fired up about, and then I realized it's Thursday. Time for the latest H.4.1 report from Uncle Ben and company. No helicopters (they actually sold about $40 billion in Treasuries) but what's this? Securities Lent to Dealers, Term Facility -- let the great Treasury swap meet begin. The $64 billion question: how good are the ratings on that high quality MBS collateral? Oh, and $6 billion went out the "regular" discount window and another $5 billion went to non-depositories. All and all another fine week; less than $600 billion of Treauries are now left.

156   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 2:38pm  

There is definitely a part of the hills where you can go too far back and you end up back in the Wild Wild West.

Wrong turn! It was a tragedy.

Perhaps one should not go above 500 ft MSL in the Bay Area.

157   OO   2008 Apr 3, 4:02pm  

What is the projected burn rate for $600M? $100M a month?

158   Peter P   2008 Apr 3, 4:13pm  

I thought it was $600B.

$600M is like a sushi dinner to the Fed.

159   SP   2008 Apr 3, 5:14pm  

Duke Says:
The fact the market continues to rise on bad news just amazes me. Here is my prediction:
In 6 weeks time (May 21) the Dow will drop below 11,500. By years end it will drop Below 10,000.

DOW 10K? That sounds like really bad news, which should make the market go up, no? :-)

160   Duke   2008 Apr 3, 10:49pm  

Back in grad school we had a professor who used to call investing, "following the bouncing lines"
According to him, you can look at events like the great depression and count on them to repeat themselves. As many here have come to call it, I think we are in the 'dead-cat' bounce.
Many are arguing that the Fed has effectively put a floor under the market. And since the market was pricing in a posssible meltdown and now they only have to price in only a recession.
Umm. No.
The Fed is blunting the worst of a rapid over shoot.
Congress is going to make the decline bi-modal with the stimulus.
But the truth is the fundamentlas stink.
There is a real destruction of the perceived wealth of credit and debt obligations. Mix in some leverging and you have a recipe for contraction. It is true that, to the extent we can, we will export some of this. But a correctly working market represents the strength of the underlying assets. Much as Thailand had no financial reserves for any market down-turn, neither do our banks and 'shadow banking' institutions. And the Fed is not large enough to cover the shortfall. In fact, only a co-ordinated effort of Central Banks can cue what ails the US.
So as for the market as the information stands today: if it growls like a bear, fishes like a bear, and eats honey like a bear. Its a bear.

« First        Comments 121 - 160 of 317       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions